<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I am okay with that.<br><br><div>-----------------</div><div>Arsène Tungali,</div><div><a href="http://about.me/ArseneTungali">about.me/ArseneTungali</a></div><div>+243 993810967</div><div>GPG: 523644A0</div><div>Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo</div><div><br></div>Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)</div><div><br>On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">due to the time constraint and since we have 2 candidates, we can endorse both and send their applications to SSC. if there is no objection, I can submit them just before 23:59UTC.</div><div class="gmail_extra">looking to hear from other PC members.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" target="_blank">icann@ferdeline.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hi,</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I believe, to support their candidacies — we have not been delegated the responsibility as PC of selecting the liaison. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Best wishes,</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div id="m_1504467033972945662protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Ayden Férdeline
<br>Sent from ProtonMail Mobile</div>
<div>
<br>
<div>
<div>
<br>
</div>On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali <<a href="mailto:arsenebaguma@gmail.com" target="_blank">arsenebaguma@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="m_1504467033972945662protonmail_quote" type="cite">So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a formal poll or are we just posting on here? ----------------- Arsène Tungali, <a href="http://about.me/ArseneTungali" target="_blank">about.me/ArseneTungali</a> <a href="tel:+243%20993%20810%20967" value="+243993810967" target="_blank">+243 993810967</a> GPG: 523644A0 Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos) >
On Sep 8, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
<u></u>wrote: > > Re-sending with the attachment. > > Tapani > > ----- Forwarded message from Paul Rosenzweig
<u></u>----- > > Dear Tapani (and Farzaneh as incoming Chair) > > I am writing to request that you consider endorsing me to be the GNSO > Liaison to the GAC. My current SOI is here: > <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<wbr>display/gnsosoi/Paul+<wbr>Rosenzweig+SOI</a>
> > My completed application template follows: > > APPLICATION TEMPLATE > > Name Paul Rosenzweig > Affiliation The Heritage Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of the NCSG > > Please provide an overview
of your experience/expertise with GNSO policy > development processes: Since 2014, I have been an active > member of the CCWG-A in both WS1 and WS2 regarding accountability mechanisms > related to the ICANN transition. As such
I have participated in the full > gamut of related GNSO/NCSG policy issue that are of applicability to that > context. Given my legal background, I have particularly focused on legal > issues -- viz, ICANN's revised mission statement,
the new Independent Review > Process, and ongoing considerations of jurisdictional issues. I have been, > and remain, especially focused on areas where the influence of the GAC seems > to reflect governmental interests that are
inconsistent with GNSO policy. > > Please provide an overview of your Previous engagements in GNSO work in a > leadership capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity to serve in > the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership capacity.
This is the first instance in > which I have volunteered for such a position. > > Please describe your familiarity with GAC processes, including GAC > engagement in GNSO policy development: As part of my work > with the
CCWG-A I came to be intimately familiar with GAC processes for > engaging in GNSO policy development. I suspect that few in the GNSO have > paid quite as much attention as I have to the GAC's rules of operation, its > definition
of consensus, and the ways in which it is permitted to influence > ICANN policy. Indeed the changes to those processes were one of the > particular focuses of my interest in the CCWG-A and one of the reasons I was > skeptical
of the ultimate product of the CCWG and the resulting changes to > ICANN's methods for considering GAC advice. I remain of the view that GAC > engagement in GNSO policy development is essential but that it should be > accomplished
through established GAC-GNSO liaison procedures and not through > extra-procedural fiat. By way of example, > I have been vocal in my view that the GAC's intervention with the Board > regarding two letter second level top level
domains was procedurally > improper (and also disappointed that the GNSO liaison to the GAC had not > alerted the GNSO to this issue earlier. [And, though neutrality is a > hallmark of a good liaison, I should also make clear
that I find GAC claims > that second level two-letter domains should be restricted deeply > unpersuasive and antithetical to policies that animate the NCSG and the > GNSO]. > > Please provide any other information that demonstrates
your qualifications > for this position: It is perhaps of relevance that I have a > history of service in the US government and thus a reasonable understanding > of the role of governments. In the 2005-09 time period I twice served
as > the Acting Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at the Department > of Homeland Security, and thus experience in international diplomatic > contexts. I attach a full resume for your consideration. > > I would
be happy to answer any further questions you or other members of the > NCSG might have. > > Regards > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch Consulting, PLLC > 509 C St. NE > Washington, DC 20002 > <a href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com" target="_blank">paul.rosenzweig@<wbr>redbranchconsulting.com</a>
> O: <a href="tel:+1%20202-547-0660" value="+12025470660" target="_blank">+1 (202) 547-0660</a> > M: <a href="tel:+1%20202-329-9650" value="+12023299650" target="_blank">+1 (202) 329-9650</a> > VOIP: <a href="tel:+1%20202-738-1739" value="+12027381739" target="_blank">+1 (202) 738-1739</a> > <a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com" target="_blank">www.redbranchconsulting.com</a> > <a href="http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com" target="_blank">www.paulrosenzweigesq.com</a> > My PGP Key: > <a href="https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684" target="_blank">https://keys.mailvelope.com/<wbr>pks/lookup?op=get&search=<wbr>0x9A830097CA066684</a>
> > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- >
<u></u>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> > <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a> ______________________________<wbr>_________________ NCSG-PC mailing list <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
</blockquote>
</div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>