<div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>councilors will have to do an electronic vote soon about the amending policy for redcross.</div><div>while we discussed the process and acknowledge that is included in GNSO PDP manual, I am wondering to which extend the list is made, including the variation of names.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik </div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">James M. Bladel</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>></span><br>Date: 2017-04-26 7:04 GMT+09:00<br>Subject: [council] MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC (EMAIL) VOTE - Initiate Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross Names<br>To: GNSO Council List <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>><br><br><br>
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="m_-3226491744981469536WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Councilors –<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><br>
Attached and copied below, please find an amended version of the Motion to Initiate Policy Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross Names that was discussed during our last meeting.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recall that, during our last GNSO Council call on 20 April, the Council agreed to defer this Motion to an electronic vote, in order to allow for certain updates to be made to the text of the motion. Also note
that the Council agreed to proceed with an electronic vote outside a regularly scheduled Council meeting.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The updated language of the motion has been reviewed and approved by me as its proposer, and Michele and Rubens as its seconders. It includes some minor clarifications received as feedback from the ICRC representatives,
but does not include any items that materially changed the scope of the affected strings, or any other items that were not discussed previously in Copenhagen.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">This email will also serve as notice that, as Council Chair, I am hereby <b>formally providing all Councilors with the requisite minimum 7 days’ advance notice of the electronic vote, in accordance with Section
4.10.2.d. of the GNSO Operating Procedures </b>(<a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-01sep16-en.pdf)" target="_blank">https://gnso.<wbr>icann.org/en/council/op-<wbr>procedures-01sep16-en.pdf)</a>. The 4-day voting period will begin at <u>23:59 UTC on Tuesday 2 May
2017 and close at 23:59 UTC on Saturday 6 May 2017</u>.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(Please be reminded that the GNSO Operating Procedures require that electronic voting be an open vote, and its outcome be published and recorded, with accompanying voter statements, if any, as minutes for
purposes of formal record keeping.)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Thank you,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">J.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">------------------</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">James Bladel<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">GNSO Chair </span>
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">_______________________<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Initiation of Policy Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross and Red Crescent Names - Deferred to electronic vote</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Submitted by: James Bladel</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Seconded: Rubens Kuhl, Michele Neylon</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, in November 2013, the GNSO completed a Policy Development Process (PDP) which resulted in a number of consensus recommendations for protecting the identifiers of International Governmental Organizations
and International Non-Governmental Organizations, including the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Movement), at the top and second level in all generic top-level domains (gTLDs) (PDP Working Group Final Report: <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-10nov13-en.pdf" target="_blank">https://gnso.icann.<wbr>org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-<wbr>10nov13-en.pdf</a>,
with Minority Statements: <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-minority-positions-10nov13-en.pdf)" target="_blank">https://gnso.<wbr>icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-<wbr>final-minority-positions-<wbr>10nov13-en.pdf</a>);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, the GNSO Council approved all the PDP consensus recommendations on 20 November 2013 (<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20131120-2)" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/en/<wbr>council/resolutions#20131120-2</a><wbr>) and,
following a mandatory public comment period on the final PDP recommendations, sent its Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board on 23 January 2014 (<a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/council-board-igo-ingo-23jan14-en.pdf)" target="_blank">https://gnso.icann.org/en/<wbr>issues/council-board-igo-ingo-<wbr>23jan14-en.pdf</a>);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, on 30 April 2014 the Board adopted those of the GNSO’s PDP recommendations that were consistent with GAC advice on the topic, which in relation to the Movement were for the terms “Red Cross”, “Red
Crescent”, “Red Crystal”, and “Red Lion & Sun” (referred to as “Scope 1 Identifiers” by the PDP Working Group) to be reserved at the top and second levels, with an Exception Procedure to be designed for the affected organization (<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-30apr14-en.htm#2.a)" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/<wbr>groups/board/documents/<wbr>resolutions-30apr14-en.htm#2.a</a><wbr>);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, between June 2014 and January 2015 the Board and the GNSO Council engaged in discussions of the remaining inconsistencies between GAC advice and GNSO policy, which in relation to the Movement concerned
the names of 189 National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, and the names and acronyms of the International Committee of the Red Cross and International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (referred to as “Scope 2 Identifiers” by the
PDP Working Group);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, at ICANN57 in November 2016 the Board proposed that the GAC and the GNSO engage in a facilitated, good faith discussion to attempt to resolve the remaining inconsistencies between GAC public policy
advice and GNSO consensus policy recommendations regarding the “Scope 2 Identifiers” of the Movement;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, representatives from the GAC and the GNSO engaged in such a facilitated, good faith discussion at ICANN58 in March 2017 during which the following matters were noted:
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(1) The public policy considerations associated with protecting the Movement’s identifiers in the domain name system (DNS);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(2) The GAC’s rationale for seeking permanent protection for the terms most closely associated with the Movement and its respective components is grounded in the protections of the designations “Red Cross”,
“Red Crescent”, “Red Lion and Sun”, and “Red Crystal” under international treaty law and under multiple national laws;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(3) The list of names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies is a finite, limited list of specific names of the National Societies recognized within the Movement (<a href="http://www.ifrc.org/Docs/ExcelExport/NS_Directory.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ifrc.org/Docs/<wbr>ExcelExport/NS_Directory.pdf</a> )<wbr>;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(4) There are no other legitimate uses for these terms; and<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(5) The GAC had provided clarification following the completion of the GNSO PDP, via its March 2014 Singapore Communique, on the finite scope of the specific list of Movement names for which permanent protections
were being requested (<a href="https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/Final%20Communique%20-%20Singapore%202014.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1397225538000&api=v2)" target="_blank">https://gacweb.icann.org/<wbr>download/attachments/28278854/<wbr>Final%20Communique%20-%<wbr>20Singapore%202014.pdf?<wbr>version=1&modificationDate=<wbr>1397225538000&api=v2</a>);<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, following the GAC-GNSO discussion, the Board passed a resolution on 16 March 2017 requesting that the GNSO initiate its process for Amendments or Modifications of Approved Policies, as described in
Section 16 of the GNSO PDP Manual (<a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-01sep16-en.pdf)" target="_blank">https://gnso.icann.org/en/<wbr>council/annex-2-pdp-manual-<wbr>01sep16-en.pdf</a>), to consider amending the GNSO’s approved policy concerning the specific
names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies and the specific names International Committee of the Red Cross and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (collectively, Recommendation 5 in Section 3.1 of the PDP Working
Group Final Report): and<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agrees that the aforementioned set of exceptional circumstances provides a justifiable basis for the Council to take this extraordinary step to reconsider the policy recommendation
and that this is not to be viewed as the Council’s consent to reopen PDP recommendations in all cases where GNSO-developed policy is in discord with GAC advice:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">RESOLVED,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">1.The GNSO Council hereby initiates the process described in Section 16 of the GNSO PDP Manual; accordingly, the GNSO Council requests that the PDP Working Group be reconvened for the purpose of consultation
by the GNSO Council on the following proposed amendment to Recommendation 5 in Section 3.1 of the PDP Working Group Final Report:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(a) The full names of the 190 Red Cross National Societies and the full names of the International Committee of the Red Cross and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies are to be
placed into Specification 5 of the Base gTLD Registry Agreement, with an exception procedure to be created for cases where the relevant Red Cross Red Crescent Movement organization wishes to apply for their protected string at the second level;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(b) In placing the specified identifiers into Specification 5 of the Registry Agreement, this should apply to an exact match of the full name of the relevant National Society recognized within the International
Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (in English and the official languages of its state of origin), the full names of the International Committee of the Red Cross and of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (in the six official
United Nations languages) and a defined limited set of variations of these names; and<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(c) In considering the proposed amendment, account is to be duly taken of the matters noted during the GAC-GNSO facilitated discussion at ICANN58 as well as of the GAC’s public policy advice to reserve the
finite list of names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies, as recognized within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, in all gTLDs.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">2. In accordance with Section 16 of the PDP Manual, the GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to post the proposed amendment to Recommendation 5 for public comment, for a period of 30 days commencing from the date
of the first meeting of the reconvened PDP Working Group.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">3. In accordance with Section 16 of the PDP Manual, the GNSO Council intends to put the proposed amendment to a vote following consultation with the PDP Working Group and the conclusion of the requisite public
comment period. The GNSO Council notes that approval of the proposed amendment requires a Supermajority Vote of both Houses in favour of the amendment.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">4. The Council thanks all of those who participated in the talks at ICANN58 in Copenhagen, and in particular Bruce Tonkin for moderating the discussion.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
council mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/council</a><br>
<br></div><br></div>