<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">ditto.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">SP</font></font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2017-03-10 10:24, avri doria wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:41ba191b-fffe-c1e0-16e3-05b430c08ccf@apc.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
No problem with delay.
But i thought we had decided on multiple candidates not winnowing down
to one.
avri
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Rafik, all,
I've spoken with CSG Chairs and they want to move the nomination
deadline at least until they've had their face-to-face meetings,
and I think we could use some extra time, too.
So there's no reason to rush. I tentatively suggested Tuesday
night, which would give us time to debate it in our Constituency
day session.
We should also discuss whether we should submit multiple
candidates or decide amongst ourselves first on one
candidate to nominate.
Tapani
On Mar 10 16:43, Rafik Dammak (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>) wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi All,
the deadline was suggested for nomination is today. we have till now 2
names: Markus Kummer and Mathew Shears.
if we are ok with this, I will send the names to CSG today. I think most of
you are already in Copenhagen, so please share your thought by 16:00 local
Time.
we didn't respond yet to Greg questions, and I guess the best way is to
suggest a meeting with and discussing the process based on the proposal we
have.
Best,
Rafik
2017-03-07 19:52 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"><rafik.dammak@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi everyone,
As we agreed before, we have to get candidates nominated for the board
seat election by this Friday.
We don't have a procedure written yet but we need to act here: nominating
and documenting the process.
I am thinking we should encourage people to nominate but not
self-nomination. And because time constraint to make the nomination by PC
members and keeping NCSG members informed about the process.
Any volunteer to help me to document the process.
It is not optimal but I sensed from the discussion that we got to be
proactive.
Best,
Rafik
On Mar 1, 2017 9:58 PM, "Rafik Dammak" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"><rafik.dammak@gmail.com></a> wrote:
Hi Ed,
Thanks for the message, yes this something we have to agree and act
quickly on it.
I think that was/should be nomination by others and within PC, but looking
to hear from others too. We got till 10th March to get nominees.
Best,
Rafik
2017-03-01 21:54 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net"><egmorris1@toast.net></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thanks Rafik.
One question; Are nominations within our group to be self nominations,
nominations by others, both, and opened to the general membership or just
members of the PC?
I'm sorry to ask what may be basic questions but I haven't been involved
in the Board selection process before and would just like to fully
understand the process.
Kind Regards,
Ed
------------------------------
*From*: "Rafik Dammak" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"><rafik.dammak@gmail.com></a>
*Sent*: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:49 PM
*To*: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:avri@acm.org">"avri@acm.org"</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:avri@acm.org"><avri@acm.org></a>
*Cc*: "ncsg-pc" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is"><ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is></a>
*Subject*: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat
Selection Process
Hi everyone,
since there was no objection, I will send our response to CSG and also
our suggestion for nomination period to run from 1st March to 10th March .
Best,
Rafik
2017-02-27 23:05 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"><rafik.dammak@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Avri,
thanks for the suggestion,
so we have now:
- we cannot accept CSG proposal.
- we can start the nomination process, for NCSG and CSG in parallel
starting (Wednesday?)
Our counter-proposal is:
* NCA is not to removed from any part of the process
* there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.
* as many nominees as come forward in a week.
* 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round between top
two
* a joint interview of the top 2 before second round with the whole
house.
* 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round of leader
against NOTA
* 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we get
our act together.
* then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we
get our act together.
we need to agree quickly on procedure for NCSG and document that.
can we get consensus this by Tuesday 12:00pm UTC and respond ot CSG?
Best,
Rafik
2017-02-24
21:42 GMT+09:00 avri doria <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:avri@acm.org"><avri@acm.org></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
some minor typo corrections
Our counter-proposal is:
* NCA is not to removed from any part of the process
* there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.
* as many nominees as come forward in a week.
* 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round between top
two
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""> * 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round of leader
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> against NOTA
* 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we get
our act together.
* then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we
get our act together.
On 24-Feb-17 00:31, Rafik Dammak wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Thanks Avri, Matt, Ed for comments and suggestions
I guess we say:
- we cannot accept CSG proposal.
- However, we can start the nomination process, for NCSG and CSG in
parallel starting next week Monday
- Our counter-proposal is:
* NCA is not to removed from any part of the process
* there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.
* as many nominees as come forward in a week.
* 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second round between top two
* 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd round of leader against
NOTA
* 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we
get our act together.
* then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we
get our act together.
if we have a consensus by Sunday, we should share our response with
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">CSG.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Best,
Rafik
2017-02-24 9:29 GMT+09:00 avri doria <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a> <mailto:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a>>>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Hi,
I think we could respond that we do not accept their proposal
- NCA is not to removed from any part of the process
- we insist that there be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to
succeed.
- as many nominees as come forward in a week.
- 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second round between top two
- 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd round of leader
against NOTA
- 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave seat open until we
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">get our
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> act together.
- then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until
we get
our act together.
avri
On 23-Feb-17 05:49, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Perhaps as a first step go back to CSG and say we are
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">considering/or
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> > not their doc and will be proposing something or an alternative
> version - and put some deadline on it for us - maybe end of next
week?
>
> And, try to get agreement on a nomination period - say next
week? or
> two weeks from Monday? Probably would be useful to have the
CSG and
> NCSG nomination periods run in parallel. Agree with CSG whether
> should be nomination and/or self nomination.
>
> In the interim start work on the process?
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 23/02/2017 08:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we really need to develop our response or proposal to CSG
quickly. at
>> least covering the topic of nomination.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-02-22 11:27 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com></a>
>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">:
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""> >>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> thanks for the response, looking for other comments on this
topic.
>> I think we can start with nomination whole we work on the
process
>> and adjust the whole timeline.
>> how we shall proceed for nominations, we have 2 candidates
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">for
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> now. shall we initiate a process to find other candidates?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">we
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> don't have so much time for a long nomination period.
>>
>> I understand that we are having the deadline as a mean to
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">press
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> us but we should stand and be clear about the aspects
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">which are
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> non-negotiable with regard to the process.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-02-21 19:13 GMT+09:00 matthew shears <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org"><mailto:mshears@cdt.org></a>
>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mailto:mshears@cdt.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org"><mailto:mshears@cdt.org></a>>>:
>>
>> Thanks Rafik
>>
>> Not sure much was agreed except that we need to deal
with it
>> and we are running out of time.
>>
>> First we had the timeline from Greg before the meeting,
which
>> was not really discussed further. Then we had some
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">general
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> discussion about the need to do something on the Board
>> selection process. People voiced their views on
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">different
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> aspects of the process and there was concern over the
>> timeline, but we did not really decide anything (others
>> please jump in as I may have missed some important
>> aspects). Markus announced he wanted to continue in
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> role; I announced I was going to run. Then the CSG
proposal
>> for a process was circulated on Thurs AM. There seemed
to be
>> general agreement that the CSG proposal was not ideal.
>>
>> I think the key immediate thing is us agreeing a
process and
>> timeline for nominations and getting that announced,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">so at
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >> least the initial stages of the process are underway.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> On 20/02/2017 10:56, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We got this note from Greg to resume the discussion on
board
>>> seat election.
>>> First thing, is it possible to get a summary of what
or not
>>> agreed on iceland on that regard from those who
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">attended
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> intersessional?
>>>
>>> We also need to outline what are our non-negotiable
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">points
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> such as having vote, NCA participation and so on.
>>>
>>> I think tgat the CSG proposal from last week is far
from our
>>> expectations.
>>> There is also proposal to have a call. We can have it
by end
>>> of this week but we do need to be ready.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Greg Shatan" <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a> <mailto:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>>>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> Date: Feb 20, 2017 2:13 PM
>>> Subject: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat
Selection Process
>>> To: <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>>>
>>> Cc:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> We probably need a different mailing list to
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">finish
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> working on the Board Seat selection process, and a
small
>>> group to do it, but I'll start here, since I think
this
>>> is the only active mailing list with both sides
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">of the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> NCPH on it.
>>>
>>> We basically have no time to work this out, and
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">we've
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> already started the process without knowing what
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">it is
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> exactly, since we have now received nominations.
>>>
>>> In addition to the adaptation of the CPH
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">procedures
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> previously circulated, I'm also attaching the
following
>>> for consideration:
>>>
>>> 1. Some bullet-points from an exchange between
CSG and
>>> NCSG representatives outlining a potential draft
process.
>>> 2. The latest version of the ICANN Staff Memo
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">with a
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> revised draft timeline and some relevant excerpts
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">from
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> Bylaws and GNSO Procedures.
>>> 3. A further excerpt from the Bylaws, with
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Section
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> 11.3(f), which covers the selection process for
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Seats
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> 13-14 (to the extent that is covered in the
Bylaws), and
>>> Section 11.3(h), which is referred to in Section
11.3(f).
>>>
>>> A few thoughts and comments:
>>>
>>> A. We only have 10 1/2 weeks to both develop and
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">go
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> through a process that is contemplated to take 21
weeks
>>> (just to go through). Talk about building the
airplane
>>> in the air.
>>>
>>> B. At the Intersessional, we discussed possible
>>> adjustments to the timeline, but did not come to
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">any
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> decisions. It's not clear to me whether Staff is
>>> preparing a further revised draft. I'll ask.
>>>
>>> C. If any of our groups have not already done
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">so, we
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> should put out a call for any other nominations
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">ASAP
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> (though it would be nice to know the end of the
>>> nomination period).
>>>
>>> D. Without making any judgments, the CPH process
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">and
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> the NCPH bullet-points are significantly different
when
>>> it comes to voting.
>>>
>>> E. We should figure out how to get this process
agreed
>>> as quickly as possible. Given the unusual
>>> circumstances, we don't need to use this process
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">as
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> precedent for any future process. We just need
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">to get
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> through this selection. One approach is for NCSG
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">to
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> respond to the draft sent at the end of the
>>> Intersessional. However, given the gap between
that and
>>> the bullet-points, it might just be better to
arrange a
>>> call/Adobe Connect session ASAP to move the ball
forward.
>>>
>>> Thanks for reading,
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> P.S. It's not all that important how we got
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">here, but
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> nonetheless, it should be noted that the GNSO
Procedures
>>> were never updated from 2012, when the Bylaws
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">deadline
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> for naming the Director was changed from one
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">month to
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> two months (briefly) and then six months prior to
being
>>> seated. (The GNSO Procedures will need to be
updated in
>>> any event, since the Bylaws references are now
>>> obsolete.)) The draft bullet-points repeated this
error.
>>>
>>> B. Since we are doing this with very little time
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Greg Shatan
>>> *C: 917-816-6428
>>> S: gsshatan
>>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Greg Shatan* <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a>>>
>>> Date: Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:28 AM
>>> Subject: Discussion Draft of Interim Board
Selection Process
>>> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>>
>>>
>>>
>>> NCSG/NCUC/NPOC Intersessional Participants,
>>>
>>> The CSG prepared a "discussion draft" of a
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">proposed
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> interim Board Selection Process based closely on
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> Final Process adopted by the Contracted Parties
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">House.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> Clean and marked drafts are attached, showing
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">changes
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> from the CPH document.
>>>
>>> A Google Docs version can be found here, where any
>>> suggested changes can be added in "suggest" mode
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">(but
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> everyone has "edit"
>>> rights):
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">m4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">um4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">m4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">um4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing>>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>>
>>> We would hope to use this for the current 2017
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Board
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> Seat process and then revisit afterward before
making it
>>> a permanent rather than "interim" process.
>>>
>>> This has not been reviewed by the membership of
the IPC,
>>> BC and ISPCP, but we wanted to start the
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">discussion on
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> this basis, given the short amount of time we
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">have for
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>> this year.
>>>
>>> We look forward to your thoughts.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Greg (on behalf of BC/IPC/ISPCP Intersessional
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Teams)
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> >>>
>>> *Greg Shatan
>>> *C: 917-816-6428 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%28917%29%20816-6428"><tel:%28917%29%20816-6428></a>
>>> S: gsshatan
>>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%28646%29%20845-9428"><tel:%28646%29%20845-9428></a>
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"><mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com></a>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncph-intersessional2017 mailing list
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org"><mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org></a>>
>>>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"><https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman">https://mm.icann.org/mailman</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"><https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017></a>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is"><mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is></a>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is"><mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is></a>>
>>> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"><https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc></a>
>>> <<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"><https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc></a>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------
>> Matthew Shears
>> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
>> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
>> + 44 771 2472987 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"><tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987></a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:+44%207712%20472987"><tel:+44%207712%20472987></a>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is"><mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is></a>
>> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"><https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc></a>
> --
> ------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 771 2472987 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"><tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987></a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a>
_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>