<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Johannesburg as policy forum can be even more challenging with less available slots for internal meetings. </div><div class="gmail_extra">we can suggest from now having breakfast and/lunch working meeting with registries, registrars but also other group.</div><div class="gmail_extra">I see that CSG is having meeting with GAC in copehangen and we didn't have the joint meeting with ALAC since a while, so we can request meeting with them in Johanesburg.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-03-08 8:28 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" target="_blank">icann@ferdeline.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>What a pity. At least we have RrSG still. I suggest we meet with RySG in Johannesburg, so that we have adequate time to prepare. </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div class="m_-5883698319532077158protonmail_signature_block"><div class="m_-5883698319532077158protonmail_signature_block-user"><div>- Ayden <br></div></div><div class="m_-5883698319532077158protonmail_signature_block-proton m_-5883698319532077158protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br></div></div></font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" class="m_-5883698319532077158protonmail_quote"><div>-------- Original Message --------<br></div><div>Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Meeting RrSG and RySG in Copenhagen - topics?<br></div><div>Local Time: 7 March 2017 6:51 PM<br></div><div>UTC Time: 7 March 2017 18:51<br></div><div>From: <a href="mailto:ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info" target="_blank">ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info</a><br></div><div>To: <a href="mailto:ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dear all,<br></div><div> <br></div><div> It turns out meeting with RySG will not be possible after all - we<br></div><div> could not find a time that'd work. :-(<br></div><div> <br></div><div> We will still have the meeting with RrSG, however.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> RySG suggested we either do a teleconference after Copenhagen<br></div><div> or schedule a meeting in Johannesburg with more time to prepare.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> Tapani<br></div><div> <br></div><div> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:36:38PM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen (<a href="mailto:ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info" target="_blank">ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info</a>) wrote:<br></div><div> <br></div><div> > Dear all,<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > Apologies for running late with this, but looking at the discussion<br></div><div> > and considering we don't have all much time and this is (hopefully)<br></div><div> > beginning of a tradition, we really should be talking more with R*SGs,<br></div><div> > I propose short agendas (first item is same in both):<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > RrSG:<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > * Tell us about yourselves, your members, your internal structure,<br></div><div> > how do you do internal governance, how do you do outreach &c.<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > * Privacy concerns:<br></div><div> > - RDS, conflicts with law, thick WHOIS<br></div><div> > - PPSAI, way forward, how to accommodate GAC objections<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > * DNA, Healthy Domains, UDRP for Copyright proposals<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > RySG:<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > * Tell us about yourselves, your members, your internal structure,<br></div><div> > how do you do internal governance, how do you do outreach &c.<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > * The New gTLD program:<br></div><div> > - how has it impacted your group, brand owners becoming registries,<br></div><div> > registries and registrars commingling &c<br></div><div> > - the imposition of new rules on legacy gTLDs when contracts are<br></div><div> > renegotiated: why and how?<br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > <br></div><div> > -- <br></div><div> > Tapani Tarvainen<br></div><div> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br></div><div> NCSG-PC mailing list<br></div><div> <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br></div><div> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>