<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div>Hi Ed,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the message, yes this something we have to agree and act quickly on it.</div><div>I think that was/should be nomination by others and within PC, but looking to hear from others too. We got till 10th March to get nominees. </div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-03-01 21:54 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span style="font-family:'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',Sans-Serif;font-size:14px"><div>Thanks Rafik. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>One question; Are nominations within our group to be self nominations, nominations by others, both, and opened to the general membership or just members of the PC?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I'm sorry to ask what may be basic questions but I haven't been involved in the Board selection process before and would just like to fully understand the process.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kind Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ed </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
<div><span style="font-family:tahoma,arial,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><b>From</b>: "Rafik Dammak" <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent</b>: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:49 PM<span class=""><br>
<b>To</b>: "<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc</b>: "ncsg-pc" <<a href="mailto:ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is">ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
</span><b>Subject</b>: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat Selection Process</span><div><div class="h5">
<div> </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">Hi everyone,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">since there was no objection, I will send our response to CSG and also our suggestion for nomination period to run from 1st March to 10th March .</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Rafik<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-02-27 23:05 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>></span>:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">Hi Avri,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">thanks for the suggestion,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">so we have now:</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><span>- we cannot accept CSG proposal.</span><br>
- we can start the nomination process, for NCSG and CSG in parallel starting (Wednesday?)<br>
<br>
<span>Our counter-proposal is:<br>
<br>
* NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
* there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.<br>
* as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
* 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round between top two</span></div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px"> <font color="#ff0000"> * a joint interview of the top 2 </font></span><span style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">before second round with the whole house.</font></span><br>
<span> * 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round of leader<br>
against NOTA<br>
* 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we get<br>
our act together.<br>
* then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we<br>
get our act together.</span><br>
<br>
we need to agree quickly on procedure for NCSG and document that.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">can we get consensus this by Tuesday 12:00pm UTC and respond ot CSG?</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"> </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Rafik
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-02-24</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"> 21:42 GMT+09:00 avri doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>></span>:
<div>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444h5">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
some minor typo corrections<br>
<br>
Our counter-proposal is:<br>
<br>
* NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
* there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.<br>
* as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
* 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round between top two </blockquote>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> * 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round of leader<br>
against NOTA<br>
* 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we get<br>
our act together.<br>
* then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we<br>
get our act together.<br>
<br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">On 24-Feb-17 00:31, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Thanks Avri, Matt, Ed for comments and suggestions<br>
><br>
> I guess we say:<br>
> - we cannot accept CSG proposal.<br>
> - However, we can start the nomination process, for NCSG and CSG in<br>
> parallel starting next week Monday<br>
> - Our counter-proposal is:<br>
></span><br>
> * NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
> * there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to succeed.<br>
> * as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
> * 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second round between top two<br>
> * 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd round of leader against<br>
> NOTA<br>
> * 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open until we<br>
> get our act together.<br>
> * then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until we<br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> get our act together.<br>
><br>
> if we have a consensus by Sunday, we should share our response with CSG.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> Rafik<br>
></span><br>
> 2017-02-24 9:29 GMT+09:00 avri doria <<a href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a>>>:
<div>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-h5">><br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I think we could respond that we do not accept their proposal<br>
><br>
> - NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
><br>
> - we insist that there be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to<br>
> succeed.<br>
><br>
> - as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
><br>
> - 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second round between top two<br>
><br>
> - 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd round of leader<br>
> against NOTA<br>
><br>
> - 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave seat open until we get our<br>
> act together.<br>
><br>
> - then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA talk until<br>
> we get<br>
> our act together.<br>
><br>
> avri<br>
><br>
> On 23-Feb-17 05:49, matthew shears wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Perhaps as a first step go back to CSG and say we are considering/or<br>
> > not their doc and will be proposing something or an alternative<br>
> > version - and put some deadline on it for us - maybe end of next<br>
> week?<br>
> ><br>
> > And, try to get agreement on a nomination period - say next<br>
> week? or<br>
> > two weeks from Monday? Probably would be useful to have the<br>
> CSG and<br>
> > NCSG nomination periods run in parallel. Agree with CSG whether<br>
> > should be nomination and/or self nomination.<br>
> ><br>
> > In the interim start work on the process?<br>
> ><br>
> > Matthew<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 23/02/2017 08:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
> >> Hi all,<br>
> >><br>
> >> we really need to develop our response or proposal to CSG<br>
> quickly. at<br>
> >> least covering the topic of nomination.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Best,<br>
> >><br>
> >> Rafik<br>
> >><br>
> >> 2017-02-22 11:27 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.co<wbr>m</a>></div>
</div>
> >> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><wbr>>>>:<br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> >><br>
> >> Hi Matt,<br>
> >><br>
> >> thanks for the response, looking for other comments on this<br>
> topic.<br>
> >> I think we can start with nomination whole we work on the<br>
> process<br>
> >> and adjust the whole timeline.<br>
> >> how we shall proceed for nominations, we have 2 candidates for<br>
> >> now. shall we initiate a process to find other candidates? we<br>
> >> don't have so much time for a long nomination period.<br>
> >><br>
> >> I understand that we are having the deadline as a mean to press<br>
> >> us but we should stand and be clear about the aspects which are<br>
> >> non-negotiable with regard to the process.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Best,<br>
> >><br>
> >> Rafik<br>
> >><br>
> >> 2017-02-21 19:13 GMT+09:00 matthew shears <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span><br>
> >> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>>>>:
<div>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-h5">> >><br>
> >> Thanks Rafik<br>
> >><br>
> >> Not sure much was agreed except that we need to deal<br>
> with it<br>
> >> and we are running out of time.<br>
> >><br>
> >> First we had the timeline from Greg before the meeting,<br>
> which<br>
> >> was not really discussed further. Then we had some general<br>
> >> discussion about the need to do something on the Board<br>
> >> selection process. People voiced their views on different<br>
> >> aspects of the process and there was concern over the<br>
> >> timeline, but we did not really decide anything (others<br>
> >> please jump in as I may have missed some important<br>
> >> aspects). Markus announced he wanted to continue in the<br>
> >> role; I announced I was going to run. Then the CSG<br>
> proposal<br>
> >> for a process was circulated on Thurs AM. There seemed<br>
> to be<br>
> >> general agreement that the CSG proposal was not ideal.<br>
> >><br>
> >> I think the key immediate thing is us agreeing a<br>
> process and<br>
> >> timeline for nominations and getting that announced, so at<br>
> >> least the initial stages of the process are underway.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Matthew<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> On 20/02/2017 10:56, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
> >>> Hi everyone,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We got this note from Greg to resume the discussion on<br>
> board<br>
> >>> seat election.<br>
> >>> First thing, is it possible to get a summary of what<br>
> or not<br>
> >>> agreed on iceland on that regard from those who attended<br>
> >>> intersessional?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We also need to outline what are our non-negotiable points<br>
> >>> such as having vote, NCA participation and so on.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I think tgat the CSG proposal from last week is far<br>
> from our<br>
> >>> expectations.<br>
> >>> There is also proposal to have a call. We can have it<br>
> by end<br>
> >>> of this week but we do need to be ready.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Best,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Rafik<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
> >>> From: "Greg Shatan" <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>></div>
</div>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.co<wbr>m</a>>>><br>
> >>> Date: Feb 20, 2017 2:13 PM<br>
> >>> Subject: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat<br>
> Selection Process<br>
> >>> To: <<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@icann<wbr>.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>></span>
<div>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-h5">> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>>>><br>
> >>> Cc:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> All,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We probably need a different mailing list to finish<br>
> >>> working on the Board Seat selection process, and a<br>
> small<br>
> >>> group to do it, but I'll start here, since I think<br>
> this<br>
> >>> is the only active mailing list with both sides of the<br>
> >>> NCPH on it.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We basically have no time to work this out, and we've<br>
> >>> already started the process without knowing what it is<br>
> >>> exactly, since we have now received nominations.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> In addition to the adaptation of the CPH procedures<br>
> >>> previously circulated, I'm also attaching the<br>
> following<br>
> >>> for consideration:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> 1. Some bullet-points from an exchange between<br>
> CSG and<br>
> >>> NCSG representatives outlining a potential draft<br>
> process.<br>
> >>> 2. The latest version of the ICANN Staff Memo with a<br>
> >>> revised draft timeline and some relevant excerpts from<br>
> >>> Bylaws and GNSO Procedures.<br>
> >>> 3. A further excerpt from the Bylaws, with Section<br>
> >>> 11.3(f), which covers the selection process for Seats<br>
> >>> 13-14 (to the extent that is covered in the<br>
> Bylaws), and<br>
> >>> Section 11.3(h), which is referred to in Section<br>
> 11.3(f).<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> A few thoughts and comments:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> A. We only have 10 1/2 weeks to both develop and go<br>
> >>> through a process that is contemplated to take 21<br>
> weeks<br>
> >>> (just to go through). Talk about building the<br>
> airplane<br>
> >>> in the air.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> B. At the Intersessional, we discussed possible<br>
> >>> adjustments to the timeline, but did not come to any<br>
> >>> decisions. It's not clear to me whether Staff is<br>
> >>> preparing a further revised draft. I'll ask.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> C. If any of our groups have not already done so, we<br>
> >>> should put out a call for any other nominations ASAP<br>
> >>> (though it would be nice to know the end of the<br>
> >>> nomination period).<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> D. Without making any judgments, the CPH process and<br>
> >>> the NCPH bullet-points are significantly different<br>
> when<br>
> >>> it comes to voting.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> E. We should figure out how to get this process<br>
> agreed<br>
> >>> as quickly as possible. Given the unusual<br>
> >>> circumstances, we don't need to use this process as<br>
> >>> precedent for any future process. We just need to get<br>
> >>> through this selection. One approach is for NCSG to<br>
> >>> respond to the draft sent at the end of the<br>
> >>> Intersessional. However, given the gap between<br>
> that and<br>
> >>> the bullet-points, it might just be better to<br>
> arrange a<br>
> >>> call/Adobe Connect session ASAP to move the ball<br>
> forward.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thanks for reading,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Greg<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> P.S. It's not all that important how we got here, but<br>
> >>> nonetheless, it should be noted that the GNSO<br>
> Procedures<br>
> >>> were never updated from 2012, when the Bylaws deadline<br>
> >>> for naming the Director was changed from one month to<br>
> >>> two months (briefly) and then six months prior to<br>
> being<br>
> >>> seated. (The GNSO Procedures will need to be<br>
> updated in<br>
> >>> any event, since the Bylaws references are now<br>
> >>> obsolete.)) The draft bullet-points repeated this<br>
> error.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> B. Since we are doing this with very little time<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *Greg Shatan<br>
> >>> *C: 917-816-6428<br>
> >>> S: gsshatan<br>
> >>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></div>
</div>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.co<wbr>m</a><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
> >>> From: *Greg Shatan* <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>></span><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>>>><br>
> >>> Date: Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:28 AM<br>
> >>> Subject: Discussion Draft of Interim Board<br>
> Selection Process<br>
> >>> To: <a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@icann.<wbr>org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>></span><br>
> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>
<div>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-h5">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> NCSG/NCUC/NPOC Intersessional Participants,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> The CSG prepared a "discussion draft" of a proposed<br>
> >>> interim Board Selection Process based closely on the<br>
> >>> Final Process adopted by the Contracted Parties House.<br>
> >>> Clean and marked drafts are attached, showing changes<br>
> >>> from the CPH document.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> A Google Docs version can be found here, where any<br>
> >>> suggested changes can be added in "suggest" mode (but<br>
> >>> everyone has "edit"<br>
> >>> rights):<br>
> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/docum<wbr>ent/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu<wbr>m4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=<wbr>sharing</a><br>
> <<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/docu<wbr>ment/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG<wbr>um4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp<wbr>=sharing</a>><br>
> >>><br>
> <<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/docum<wbr>ent/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGu<wbr>m4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=<wbr>sharing</a><br>
> <<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/docu<wbr>ment/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHG<wbr>um4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp<wbr>=sharing</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We would hope to use this for the current 2017 Board<br>
> >>> Seat process and then revisit afterward before<br>
> making it<br>
> >>> a permanent rather than "interim" process.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> This has not been reviewed by the membership of<br>
> the IPC,<br>
> >>> BC and ISPCP, but we wanted to start the discussion on<br>
> >>> this basis, given the short amount of time we have for<br>
> >>> this year.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> We look forward to your thoughts.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thanks!<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Greg (on behalf of BC/IPC/ISPCP Intersessional Teams)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *Greg Shatan<br>
> >>> *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428><br>
> >>> S: gsshatan<br>
> >>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428<br>
> <tel:%28646%29%20845-9428><br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></div>
</div>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.co<wbr>m</a><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.c<wbr>om</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> _____________________________<wbr>__________________<br>
> >>> Ncph-intersessional2017 mailing list<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional2017@icann<wbr>.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>></span><br>
> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional20<wbr>17@icann.org</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/ncph-intersessional201<wbr>7</a><br>
> <<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2<wbr>017</a>><br>
> >>> <<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2<wbr>017</a><br>
> <<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2<wbr>017</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> _____________________________<wbr>__________________<br>
> >>> NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>></span><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><wbr>><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> >>> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
> >>> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>>><br>
> >><br>
> >> --<br>
> >> ------------<br>
> >> Matthew Shears<br>
> >> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<br>
> >> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)</span><br>
> >> <a href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987" value="+447712472987">+ 44 771 2472987</a> <tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> <tel:+44%207712%20472987><br>
> >><br>
> >> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> >> NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
> >> <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
> >> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
> > --<br>
> > ------------<br>
> > Matthew Shears<br>
> > Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<br>
> > Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)</span><br>
> > <a href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987" value="+447712472987">+ 44 771 2472987</a> <tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> ><br>
> > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> > NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
><br>
></span><br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-">> ---<br>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.</span><br>
> <a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer">https://www.avast.com/antivir<wbr>us</a> <<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer">https://www.avast.com/antivir<wbr>us</a>><br>
><br>
> _____________________________<wbr>__________________<br>
> NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<span class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-im m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-HOEnZb">> <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
><br>
></span><br>
<br>
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-HOEnZb">
<div class="m_-276948684877499984m_-4052440773660215444m_2904200895758658371gmail-h5">---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer">https://www.avast.com/antiviru<wbr>s</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></span>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>