<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>I think this looks OK.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/02/2017 14:05, Rafik Dammak
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAH5sTh=6Mbd57UZgoRjREsahPnc5L1idFAEy4zbOuWxHd_=p2w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">Hi Avri,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">thanks for the suggestion,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">so we have now:</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">- we cannot accept CSG proposal.<br>
          - we can start the nomination process, for NCSG and CSG in
          parallel starting (Wednesday?)<br>
          <br>
          Our counter-proposal is:<br>
          <br>
            * NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
            * there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to
          succeed.<br>
            * as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
            * 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round
          between top two</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px"> <font
              color="#ff0000"> * a joint interview of the top 2 </font></span><span
            style="font-size:12.8px"><font color="#ff0000">before second
              round with the whole house.</font></span><br>
            * 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round of
          leader<br>
              against NOTA<br>
            * 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat open
          until we get<br>
              our act together.<br>
            *  then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA  talk
          until we<br>
              get our act together.<br>
          <br>
          we need to agree quickly on procedure for NCSG and document
          that.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">can we get consensus this by Tuesday
          12:00pm UTC and respond ot CSG?</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">  </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Rafik<br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">2017-02-24</div>
          <div class="gmail_quote"> 21:42 GMT+09:00 avri doria <span
              dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span>:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
              <br>
              some minor typo corrections<br>
              <br>
              Our counter-proposal is:<br>
              <br>
                * NCA is not to removed from any part of the process<br>
                * there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8 to
              succeed.<br>
                * as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
                * 1st round if one gets 8 then done, if not second round
              between top two </blockquote>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                * 2nd round if one get 8 then done, if not do 3rd round
              of leader<br>
                  against NOTA<br>
                * 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the seat
              open until we get<br>
                  our act together.<br>
                *  then CSG PCs, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and NCA 
              talk until we<br>
                  get our act together.<br>
              <span class="gmail-"><br>
                On 24-Feb-17 00:31, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
                > Hi,<br>
                ><br>
                > Thanks Avri, Matt, Ed for comments and suggestions<br>
                ><br>
                > I guess we say:<br>
                > - we cannot accept CSG proposal.<br>
                > - However, we can start the nomination process, for
                NCSG and CSG in<br>
                > parallel starting next week Monday<br>
                > - Our counter-proposal is:<br>
                ><br>
              </span>>   * NCA is not to removed from any part of the
              process<br>
              >   * there must be a vote along the previous lines - 8
              to succeed.<br>
              >   * as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
              >   * 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second round
              between top two<br>
              >   * 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd round
              of leader against<br>
              >     NOTA<br>
              >   * 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave the
              seat open until we<br>
              >     get our act together.<br>
              >   *  then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members and
              NCA  talk until we<br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     get our act together.<br>
                ><br>
                > if we have a consensus by Sunday, we should share
                our response with CSG.<br>
                ><br>
                > Best,<br>
                ><br>
                > Rafik<br>
                ><br>
              </span>> 2017-02-24 9:29 GMT+09:00 avri doria <<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:avri@apc.org">avri@apc.org</a>>>:<br>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail-h5">><br>
                  >     Hi,<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     I think we could respond that we do not
                  accept their proposal<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - NCA is not to removed from any part of the
                  process<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - we insist that there be a vote along the
                  previous lines - 8 to<br>
                  >     succeed.<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - as many nominees as come forward in a week.<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - 1st round if one get 8 done, if not second
                  round between top two<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - 2nd round if one get 8 done, if not do 3rd
                  round of leader<br>
                  >     against NOTA<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - 3rd round if person does not get 8, leave
                  seat open until we get our<br>
                  >     act together.<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     - then CSG PC, NCSG PC, NCPH council members
                  and NCA  talk until<br>
                  >     we get<br>
                  >     our act together.<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     avri<br>
                  ><br>
                  >     On 23-Feb-17 05:49, matthew shears wrote:<br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     > Perhaps as a first step go back to CSG
                  and say we are considering/or<br>
                  >     > not their doc and will be proposing
                  something or an alternative<br>
                  >     > version - and put some deadline on it
                  for us - maybe end of next<br>
                  >     week?<br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     > And, try to get agreement on a
                  nomination period - say next<br>
                  >     week?  or<br>
                  >     > two weeks from Monday?   Probably would
                  be useful to have the<br>
                  >     CSG and<br>
                  >     > NCSG nomination periods run in
                  parallel.  Agree with CSG whether<br>
                  >     > should be nomination and/or self
                  nomination.<br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     > In the interim start work on the
                  process?<br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     > Matthew<br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     ><br>
                  >     > On 23/02/2017 08:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
                  >     >> Hi all,<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >> we really need to develop our
                  response or proposal to CSG<br>
                  >     quickly. at<br>
                  >     >> least covering the topic of
                  nomination.<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >> Best,<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >> Rafik<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >> 2017-02-22 11:27 GMT+09:00 Rafik
                  Dammak <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><br>
                  >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><wbr>><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              >     >> <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><wbr>>>>:<br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     >><br>
                >     >>     Hi Matt,<br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>     thanks for the response, looking
                for other comments on this<br>
                >     topic.<br>
                >     >>     I think we can start with
                nomination whole we work on the<br>
                >     process<br>
                >     >>     and adjust the whole timeline.<br>
                >     >>     how we shall proceed for
                nominations, we have 2 candidates for<br>
                >     >>     now. shall we initiate a process
                to find other candidates? we<br>
                >     >>     don't have so much time for a long
                nomination period.<br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>     I understand that we are having
                the deadline as a mean to press<br>
                >     >>     us but we should stand and be
                clear about the aspects which are<br>
                >     >>     non-negotiable with regard to the
                process.<br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>     Best,<br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>     Rafik<br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>     2017-02-21 19:13 GMT+09:00 matthew
                shears <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>><br>
              </span>>     >>     <mailto:<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>>>>:<br>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail-h5">>     >><br>
                  >     >>         Thanks Rafik<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >>         Not sure much was agreed
                  except that we need to deal<br>
                  >     with it<br>
                  >     >>         and we are running out of
                  time.<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >>         First we had the timeline
                  from Greg before the meeting,<br>
                  >     which<br>
                  >     >>         was not really discussed
                  further.  Then we had some general<br>
                  >     >>         discussion about the need to
                  do something on the Board<br>
                  >     >>         selection process.  People
                  voiced their views on different<br>
                  >     >>         aspects of the process and
                  there was concern over the<br>
                  >     >>         timeline, but we did not
                  really decide anything (others<br>
                  >     >>         please jump in as I may have
                  missed some important<br>
                  >     >>         aspects).   Markus announced
                  he wanted to continue in the<br>
                  >     >>         role; I announced I was
                  going to run.  Then the CSG<br>
                  >     proposal<br>
                  >     >>         for a process was circulated
                  on Thurs AM.  There seemed<br>
                  >     to be<br>
                  >     >>         general agreement that the
                  CSG proposal was not ideal.<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >>         I think the key immediate
                  thing is us agreeing a<br>
                  >     process and<br>
                  >     >>         timeline for nominations and
                  getting that announced, so at<br>
                  >     >>         least the initial stages of
                  the process are underway.<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >>         Matthew<br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >><br>
                  >     >>         On 20/02/2017 10:56, Rafik
                  Dammak wrote:<br>
                  >     >>>         Hi everyone,<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         We got this note from
                  Greg to resume the discussion on<br>
                  >     board<br>
                  >     >>>         seat election.<br>
                  >     >>>         First thing, is it
                  possible to get a summary of what<br>
                  >     or not<br>
                  >     >>>         agreed on iceland on
                  that regard from those who attended<br>
                  >     >>>         intersessional?<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         We also need to outline
                  what are our non-negotiable points<br>
                  >     >>>         such as having vote, NCA
                  participation and so on.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         I think tgat the CSG
                  proposal from last week is far<br>
                  >     from our<br>
                  >     >>>         expectations.<br>
                  >     >>>         There is also proposal
                  to have a call. We can have it<br>
                  >     by end<br>
                  >     >>>         of this week but we do
                  need to be ready.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         Best,<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         Rafik<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>         ---------- Forwarded
                  message ----------<br>
                  >     >>>         From: "Greg Shatan" <<a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
                  >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <span class="gmail-">>     >>>       
                 <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>
                <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>>><br>
                >     >>>         Date: Feb 20, 2017 2:13 PM<br>
                >     >>>         Subject:
                [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat<br>
                >     Selection Process<br>
                >     >>>         To: <<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@<wbr>icann.org</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>><br>
              </span>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail-h5">>     >>>       
                   <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a><br>
                  >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>>><wbr>><br>
                  >     >>>         Cc:<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             All,<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             We probably need a
                  different mailing list to finish<br>
                  >     >>>             working on the Board
                  Seat selection process, and a<br>
                  >     small<br>
                  >     >>>             group to do it, but
                  I'll start here, since I think<br>
                  >     this<br>
                  >     >>>             is the only active
                  mailing list with both sides of the<br>
                  >     >>>             NCPH on it.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             We basically have no
                  time to work this out, and we've<br>
                  >     >>>             already started the
                  process without knowing what it is<br>
                  >     >>>             exactly, since we
                  have now received nominations.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             In addition to the
                  adaptation of the CPH procedures<br>
                  >     >>>             previously
                  circulated, I'm also attaching the<br>
                  >     following<br>
                  >     >>>             for consideration:<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             1.  Some
                  bullet-points from an exchange between<br>
                  >     CSG and<br>
                  >     >>>             NCSG representatives
                  outlining a potential draft<br>
                  >     process.<br>
                  >     >>>             2.  The latest
                  version of the ICANN Staff Memo with a<br>
                  >     >>>             revised draft
                  timeline and some relevant excerpts from<br>
                  >     >>>             Bylaws and GNSO
                  Procedures.<br>
                  >     >>>             3.  A further
                  excerpt from the Bylaws, with Section<br>
                  >     >>>             11.3(f), which
                  covers the selection process for Seats<br>
                  >     >>>             13-14 (to the extent
                  that is covered in the<br>
                  >     Bylaws), and<br>
                  >     >>>             Section 11.3(h),
                  which is referred to in Section<br>
                  >     11.3(f).<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             A few thoughts and
                  comments:<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             A.  We only have 10
                  1/2 weeks to both develop and go<br>
                  >     >>>             through a process
                  that is contemplated to take 21<br>
                  >     weeks<br>
                  >     >>>             (just to go
                  through).  Talk about building the<br>
                  >     airplane<br>
                  >     >>>             in the air.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             B.  At the
                  Intersessional, we discussed possible<br>
                  >     >>>             adjustments to the
                  timeline, but did not come to any<br>
                  >     >>>             decisions.  It's not
                  clear to me whether Staff is<br>
                  >     >>>             preparing a further
                  revised draft.  I'll ask.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             C.  If any of our
                  groups have not already done so, we<br>
                  >     >>>             should put out a
                  call for any other nominations ASAP<br>
                  >     >>>             (though it would be
                  nice to know the end of the<br>
                  >     >>>             nomination period).<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             D.  Without making
                  any judgments, the CPH process and<br>
                  >     >>>             the NCPH
                  bullet-points are significantly different<br>
                  >     when<br>
                  >     >>>             it comes to voting.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             E.  We should figure
                  out how to get this process<br>
                  >     agreed<br>
                  >     >>>             as quickly as
                  possible.  Given the unusual<br>
                  >     >>>             circumstances, we
                  don't need to use this process as<br>
                  >     >>>             precedent for any
                  future process.  We just need to get<br>
                  >     >>>             through this
                  selection.  One approach is for NCSG to<br>
                  >     >>>             respond to the draft
                  sent at the end of the<br>
                  >     >>>             Intersessional. 
                  However, given the gap between<br>
                  >     that and<br>
                  >     >>>             the bullet-points,
                  it might just be better to<br>
                  >     arrange a<br>
                  >     >>>             call/Adobe Connect
                  session ASAP to move the ball<br>
                  >     forward.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             Thanks for reading,<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             Greg<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             P.S.  It's not all
                  that important how we got here, but<br>
                  >     >>>             nonetheless, it
                  should be noted that the GNSO<br>
                  >     Procedures<br>
                  >     >>>             were never updated
                  from 2012, when the Bylaws deadline<br>
                  >     >>>             for naming the
                  Director was changed from one month to<br>
                  >     >>>             two months (briefly)
                  and then six months prior to<br>
                  >     being<br>
                  >     >>>             seated.  (The GNSO
                  Procedures will need to be<br>
                  >     updated in<br>
                  >     >>>             any event, since the
                  Bylaws references are now<br>
                  >     >>>             obsolete.))  The
                  draft bullet-points repeated this<br>
                  >     error.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             B.  Since we are
                  doing this with very little time<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             *Greg Shatan<br>
                  >     >>>             *C: 917-816-6428<br>
                  >     >>>             S: gsshatan<br>
                  >     >>>             Phone-to-Skype:
                  646-845-9428<br>
                  >     >>>             <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     <mailto:<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>>             ---------- Forwarded
                message ----------<br>
                >     >>>             From: *Greg Shatan*
                <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>><br>
              </span><span class="gmail-">>     >>>         
                   <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>>><br>
                >     >>>             Date: Thu, Feb 16,
                2017 at 5:28 AM<br>
                >     >>>             Subject: Discussion
                Draft of Interim Board<br>
                >     Selection Process<br>
                >     >>>             To: <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-intersessional2017@icann.<wbr>org</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>><br>
              </span>>     >>>             <mailto:<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a><br>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail-h5">>     <mailto:<a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             NCSG/NCUC/NPOC
                  Intersessional Participants,<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             The CSG prepared a
                  "discussion draft" of a proposed<br>
                  >     >>>             interim Board
                  Selection Process based closely on the<br>
                  >     >>>             Final Process
                  adopted by the Contracted Parties House.<br>
                  >     >>>             Clean and marked
                  drafts are attached, showing changes<br>
                  >     >>>             from the CPH
                  document.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             A Google Docs
                  version can be found here, where any<br>
                  >     >>>             suggested changes
                  can be added in "suggest" mode (but<br>
                  >     >>>             everyone has "edit"<br>
                  >     >>>             rights):<br>
                  >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/<wbr>document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_<wbr>RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/<wbr>edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
                  >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/<wbr>document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_<wbr>RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/<wbr>edit?usp=sharing</a>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >      <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/<wbr>document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_<wbr>RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/<wbr>edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
                  >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/<wbr>document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_<wbr>RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/<wbr>edit?usp=sharing</a>>><br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             We would hope to use
                  this for the current 2017 Board<br>
                  >     >>>             Seat process and
                  then revisit afterward before<br>
                  >     making it<br>
                  >     >>>             a permanent rather
                  than "interim" process.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             This has not been
                  reviewed by the membership of<br>
                  >     the IPC,<br>
                  >     >>>             BC and ISPCP, but we
                  wanted to start the discussion on<br>
                  >     >>>             this basis, given
                  the short amount of time we have for<br>
                  >     >>>             this year.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             We look forward to
                  your thoughts.<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             Thanks!<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             Greg (on behalf of
                  BC/IPC/ISPCP Intersessional Teams)<br>
                  >     >>><br>
                  >     >>>             *Greg Shatan<br>
                  >     >>>             *C: 917-816-6428
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%28917%29%20816-6428"><tel:%28917%29%20816-6428></a><br>
                  >     >>>             S: gsshatan<br>
                  >     >>>             Phone-to-Skype:
                  646-845-9428<br>
                  >     <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%28646%29%20845-9428"><tel:%28646%29%20845-9428></a><br>
                  >     >>>             <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     <mailto:<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.<wbr>com</a>>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>>           
                 ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                >     >>>           
                 Ncph-intersessional2017 mailing list<br>
                >     >>>             <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.<wbr>org</a><br>
                >     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>><br>
              </span>>     >>>             <mailto:<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     <mailto:<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017@icann.org">Ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017@icann.org</a>>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017</a>><br>
                >     >>>             <<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncph-<wbr>intersessional2017</a>>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>><br>
                >     >>>       
                 ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                >     >>>         NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
                >     >>>         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
              </span>>     <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
              <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><wbr>><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     >>>         <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
                >     >>>         <<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>>><br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >>         --<br>
                >     >>         ------------<br>
                >     >>         Matthew Shears<br>
                >     >>         Global Internet Policy and
                Human Rights<br>
                >     >>         Center for Democracy &
                Technology (CDT)<br>
              </span>>     >>         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"
                value="+447712472987">+ 44 771 2472987</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"><tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987></a><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>   
                 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:+44%207712%20472987"><tel:+44%207712%20472987></a><br>
                >     >><br>
                >     >> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                >     >> NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
                >     >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
                >     >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
                >     > --<br>
                >     > ------------<br>
                >     > Matthew Shears<br>
                >     > Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<br>
                >     > Center for Democracy & Technology
                (CDT)<br>
              </span>>     > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"
                value="+447712472987">+ 44 771 2472987</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987"><tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987></a><br>
              <span class="gmail-">>     ><br>
                >     > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                >     > NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
                >     > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
                >     > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
              </span><span class="gmail-">>     ---<br>
                >     This email has been checked for viruses by
                Avast antivirus software.<br>
              </span>>     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer"
                target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/<wbr>antivirus</a>
              <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer"
                target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/<wbr>antivirus</a>><br>
              ><br>
              >     ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
              >     NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
              <span class="gmail-im gmail-HOEnZb">>     <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
                >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
                >     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>><br>
                ><br>
                ><br>
                <br>
                <br>
              </span>
              <div class="gmail-HOEnZb">
                <div class="gmail-h5">---<br>
                  This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
                  antivirus software.<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/<wbr>antivirus</a><br>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987</pre>
  </body>
</html>