<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Tx you, Stephanie for cc'ing me.  I don't think this scope goes
      far enough -- and I don't see any questions asking about the
      protections for Registrants. We worked very hard in Whois Review
      Team One to ensure that the inquiry was balanced and that everyone
      knew that Whois investigations, disclosures and compilations could
      hurt those Noncommercial Registrants and others who use the DNS
      for free speech, free expression, fair use and fair dealing and
      other forms of treasured communication -- including speech
      critical to governments, corporations, even ICANN!</p>
    <p>Accordingly, I look at the list below and wonder (<font
        color="#ff0000">in red</font>) about whether it can be expanded
      to at least be balanced and not completely one-sided in its review
      (e.g., how much can we give those who complain (IP and LE)?   <b><i>Q</i></b><b><i>uick
          note that I have no idea how to take these suggestions to
          those who can process them -- do you? Can you?</i></b></p>
    <p>Best, Kathy<br>
    </p>
    <p>
      <meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
    </p>
    <p>
      <title></title>
      <meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice 4.1.1 (Win32)">
      <style type="text/css">
        <!--
                @page { margin: 0.79in }
                P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }
        -->
        </style>
      <ul>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Whether RDS efforts meet the
              “legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer
              trust and safeguarding registrant data.” </p>
          </li>
          <li><font color="#ff0000">Whether RDS effort protect the legitimate
              rights of registrants - individuals, noncommercial
              organizations, small businesses and others, in their right
              to communicate political, personal, research, hobby and
              educational ideas with the privacy granted under national
              laws and consistent with the best free expression traditions
              of the world. <br>
            </font></li>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">How RDS current & future
              recommendations might be improved and better coordinated<font
                color="#ff0000"> for the benefit of all stakeholders. <br>
              </font></p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Privacy and Proxy Services
              Accreditation Issues and Implementation </p>
          </li>
          <ul>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">How was the balance achieved in
                this long and painstaking Working Group? (with over
                10,000 comments)<br>
              </font></li>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">Has implementation under the
                direction of ICANN Staff and a much smaller team of
                volunteers fulfilled (or not) the goals of the PPSAI
                Working Group<br>
              </font></li>
          </ul>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Compliance enforcement
              actions, structure, and processes</p>
          </li>
          <ul>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">Where are the Due Process
                Protections for registrants?</font></li>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">Where is ICANN Compliance in
                ensuring that registrants know when their domain names
                are being investigated (e.g., ensuring that registrars
                contact registrants re: investigation in a timely manner
                and with information about how to respond, and if not
                ICANN handles this function)?</font></li>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">How does ICANN Compliance evaluate
                complaints for harassment and "bullshit factor" --
                someone reporting something in the Whois record that
                does not impact the reliability of the data or the
                reachability of the registrant (e.g., a student not
                having a cell phone due to financial constraints, but
                otherwise COMPLETELY reachable by email, regular mail,
                etc.)?</font></li>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">How can a registrant appeal a
                takedown of his/her/its domain name by ICANN Compliance
                -- and even investigate the details (registrants are
                going in circles trying to understand how their domain
                names disappeared).</font></li>
            <li><font color="#ff0000">What steps can Compliance take to
                throw out abuse by those filing complaints?  How can
                Compliance let the community know these anti-abuse steps
                are being taken? <br>
              </font></li>
          </ul>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Availability of transparent
              enforcement of contractual obligations data </p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">The value and timing of RDAP
              as a replacement protocol </p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">The effectiveness of any other
              steps ICANN Org has taken to implement WHOIS
              Recommendations </p>
          </li>
          <li><font color="#ff0000">How have changes in law, high level
              court decision, adoption of data protection laws
              worldwide, etc, changed the legal framework of Whois and RDS
              data since the original Whois Review Team Report and how
              does this impact ICANN's work going forward.</font></li>
          <li><font color="#ff0000"><br>
            </font></li>
        </ul>
      </ul>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/20/2017 6:15 PM, Stephanie Perrin
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:bf4737b5-efd1-9769-7e65-99cd0ea369e2@mail.utoronto.ca"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Please note this is
            our last kick at this can.  I really don't have much
            guidance; I don't quite understand exactly what we are going
            to study.....but I like the idea of 6 months.  Copying Kathy
            who co-chaired the last one, she is most likely to be able
            to figure out if this will work....<br>
          </font></font></p>
      <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie</font></font><br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
        <br>
        -------- Forwarded Message --------
        <table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0"
          cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Subject:
              </th>
              <td>[council] RDS Scope Guidance</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Date:
              </th>
              <td>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:31:56 +0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">From:
              </th>
              <td>James M. Bladel <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com"><jbladel@godaddy.com></a></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">To: </th>
              <td>GNSO Council List <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org"><council@gnso.icann.org></a></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <br>
        <br>
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=utf-8">
        <meta name="Title" content="">
        <meta name="Keywords" content="">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
          medium)">
        <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Calibri;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:Calibri;
        color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        mso-style-name:"";
        text-decoration:underline;
        color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:Calibri;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Councilors
              –<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Attached,
              please find a draft RDS Scope Guidance document, which
              consolidates the feedback received from all SOs and ACs on
              guidance/recommendations to limit the scope of the
              upcoming RDS (WHOIS) review.  Time is tight, so if you
              have any comments or edits, please respond by <b>2000 UTC
                this Friday 24 FEB.</b><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Once
              completed, the RDS Scope Guidance document will be
              distributed to RDS Review Team applicants, to confirm that
              they are still interested in serving on this review team. 
              There is also a proposal to extend the call for
              applications until 7 MAR.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thank you,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">J.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>