<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">We should discuss our
          views on this in the Friday call.</font></font></p>
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie Perrin</font></font><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
      <br>
      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      <table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
        cellspacing="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Subject:
            </th>
            <td>Re: [council] Fwd: CCWG-Accountability WG proposal for a
              Limited Scope of the ATRT3 Review - reminder</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Date: </th>
            <td>Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:13:44 +0000</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">From: </th>
            <td>Phil Corwin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com"><psc@vlaw-dc.com></a></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">To: </th>
            <td>James M. Bladel <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com"><jbladel@godaddy.com></a>, GNSO
              Council List <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org"><council@gnso.icann.org></a></td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <br>
      <br>
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
        medium)">
      <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
p.gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph, li.gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph, div.gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph
        {mso-style-name:gmail-m_-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">FYI,
            the BC supports the reduced scope of this upcoming review.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Philip
                S. Corwin, Founding Principal</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Virtualaw
                LLC</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">1155
                F Street, NW</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Suite
                1050</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Washington,
                DC 20004</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-559-8597/Direct</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-559-8750/Fax</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-255-6172/Cell</span></b><b><span
                style="color:navy"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Twitter:
                @VlawDC</span></b><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">"Luck
                  is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey</span></i></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
            1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
                <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org">council-bounces@gnso.icann.org</a>
                [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org">mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org</a>]
                <b>On Behalf Of </b>James M. Bladel<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Friday, January 27, 2017 10:57 PM<br>
                <b>To:</b> GNSO Council List<br>
                <b>Subject:</b> [council] Fwd: CCWG-Accountability WG
                proposal for a Limited Scope of the ATRT3 Review -
                reminder<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div id="compose">
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Councilors -<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Please see the message from CCWG Staff,
              below.  Most of the SO-AC chairs (myself included) took
              this note as informational, and missed the call to action.<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">In a nutshell, the CCWG co-chairs note
              that the upcoming ATRT3 review team will overlap
              significantly with the recently completed (Workstream 1)
              and ongoing work (Workstream 2) of CCWG-ACCT.  Like the
              approach to WHOIS2, they are proposing a reduced scope for
              this next review to avoid collision/duplication of work.<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I'd welcome any comments or thoughts
              you might have on this, and we can add it as a discussion
              item for our draft agenda for our Council call in
              February.<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Thank you, <br>
                <br>
                J.<br>
                -------------<br>
                James Bladel<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">_____________________________<br>
            From: Bernard Turcotte <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com">turcotte.bernard@gmail.com</a>><br>
            Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 14:41<br>
            Subject: CCWG-Accountability WG proposal for a Limited Scope
            of the ATRT3 Review - reminder<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <o:p></o:p></p>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">​​SO and AC Chairs,<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">​This is a reminder that the
                CCWG-Accountability has not received any replies to its
                December 2nd proposal (original message below) regarding
                the scope of the upcoming ATRT3 review which will be
                publishing its call for volunteers by the end of
                January.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">As stated in the proposal​ there are
                a number of significant overlaps between the work of the
                CCWG-Accountability and a standard ATRT review which
                would cause an important duplication of work between
                these two processes.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">The CCWG-Accountability simply wishes
                to ensure that the SO's and AC's are aware that if there
                is no request from the SO's and AC's to modify the scope
                of the ATRT3 review prior to its launch that it will
                proceed as a standard review.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">​The Co​-Chairs of the
                CCWG-Accountability remain available to the SO's and
                AC's for further discussions or answer any questions.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Bernard Turcotte<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">ICANN Staff Support to the
                CCWG-Accountability for <o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">The Co-Chairs of the ​<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">CCWG-Accountability.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:07 AM,
                  Mathieu Weill <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>
                  wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:11.3pt;line-height:105%">
                      Dear SO & AC Chairs, <span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:11.3pt;line-height:105%">
                      The CCWG-Accountability (CCWG) at its face to face
                      meeting at the ICANN 56 in Helsinki considered the
                      implications of the collision of topics, and
                      therefore efforts, between ATRT3 and Work Stream 2
                      (WS2) (please see Annex 1 for a detailed
                      consideration of this issue).<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:11.3pt;line-height:105%">
                      In its discussion of this issue the CCWG
                      considered the following points:<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p
                      class="gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:35.3pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%">
                      <span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;line-height:105%">        </span>Collision
                      of topics between WS2 and ATRT3 - There is
                      potential for significant overlap between WS2
                      topics and the scope of ATRT3 as 6 of the 9 WS2
                      topics are accountability and transparency issues
                      ATRT3 could also consider.<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p
                      class="gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:35.3pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%">
                      <span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;line-height:105%">        </span>Timing
                      of the two activities - WS2 began in July 2016
                      with an objective of completing its work by the
                      end of 2017. ATRT3, which is expected to take 12
                      months to complete, is currently scheduled to
                      begin in January 2017 but could potentially be
                      delayed until February 2018 under the new Bylaws
                      (which require ATRT every 5 years versus the AoC
                      requirement for every 3 years). It would seem
                      inefficient, at best, to have both of these
                      activities working on the same topics
                      independently, while drawing on the same pool of
                      community volunteers. At worst, ATRT3 and WS2
                      groups could issue recommendations that are
                      conflicting or duplicative.<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p
                      class="gmail-m-1649711386684943605msolistparagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:35.3pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%">
                      <span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;line-height:105%">        </span>Implementation
                      of recommendations – The Bylaws for WS2 give CCWG
                      recommendations greater weight when it comes to
                      board consideration, relative to recommendations
                      from an ATRT organized under the AoC.<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;line-height:105%">While
                      in Helsinki, the CCWG concluded its preferred
                      approach, as communicated in our 8-Aug-2016<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-et-al-to-icann-board-08aug16-en.pdf"
                        target="_blank">letter</a> to the Board of
                      ICANN:<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-left:36.7pt;line-height:105%">
                      Convene ATRT3 as soon as possible with the limited
                      scope of assessing implementation of ATRT2
                      recommendations. Allow WS2 to handle new
                      recommendations for accountability and
                      transparency. The fourth ATRT would convene before
                      2022 and would assess all accountability and
                      transparency topics and make recommendations<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">The
                      ICANN Board <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-sanchez-et-al-24oct16-en.pdf"
                        target="_blank">
                        replied</a> to the CCWG letter on 24-Oct-2016,
                      saying,<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in">It
                      is not up to the Board to dictate the scope of
                      this important community review. While we share
                      the concerns raised of avoiding duplication of
                      resources, it is essential that the broader ICANN
                      community have a voice in determining how the
                      ATRT3 should be scoped in alignment with the
                      Bylaws. The Board and the ICANN Organization stand
                      ready to support the community’s direction.<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">Accordingly,
                      the CCWG is now proposing to community leadership
                      the following approach:<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Requesting that
                      the SO/AC leadership select (following the new
                      Bylaws) a small group of review team members that
                      have either participated in or closely tracked
                      ATRT2.<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Requesting the
                      ICANN organization to do a "self-assessment"
                      reporting on a) the extent to which each
                      recommendation was followed and/or implemented; b)
                      the effectiveness in addressing the issues
                      identified by ATRT2; and c) the need for
                      additional implementation.
                      <span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Specifically
                      request that the Review Team exclude the issues
                      that are already covered by the
                      CCWG-Accountability WS2 (see Annex 1).<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Suggesting that
                      the work be conducted & completed more quickly
                      than normal, such as asking that the Final Report
                      be issued within six months<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:11.3pt;line-height:105%">
                      If the suggested approach above is agreeable to
                      SO/AC community, the next steps would be:<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>SO/AC leadership
                      to issue a public statement or a letter to ICANN
                      CEO and Board Chair that explains why limited
                      scope is appropriate and articulates that they
                      have broad support of the ICANN community<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Call for
                      Volunteers to note limited scope & unique
                      expertise sought<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-bottom:2.4pt;margin-left:36.5pt"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Reach out to
                      previous ATRT Review Team members and encourage
                      them to apply for the narrowly-scoped ATRT3 Review
                      Team<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-right:.35pt;margin-left:36.5pt">
                      <span
                        style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";border:none
                        windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">•</span><span
                        style="font-size:7.0pt;border:none windowtext
                        1.0pt;padding:0in">      </span>Propose a
                      Charter for the ATRT3 Review Team to adopt that
                      tracks the limited Scope<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Best
                      regards,<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Thomas
                      Rickert, Leon Sanchez & Mathieu Weill<span
                        lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"
                      style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">CCWG-Accountability
                      Co-chairs<span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Acct-Staff mailing list<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:Acct-Staff@icann.org">Acct-Staff@icann.org</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/acct-staff"
                    target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/acct-staff</a><o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center" align="center">
          <hr style="color:#A0A0A0" align="center" noshade="noshade"
            size="1" width="100%">
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">No
          virus found in this message.<br>
          Checked by AVG - <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature">www.avg.com</a><br>
          Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4749/13802 - Release
          Date: 01/20/17<br>
          Internal Virus Database is out of date.<o:p></o:p></p>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>