<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><span></span></div><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div>Hi Ayden,</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Thanks for helping to put this together. I appreciate the synthesis of comments and perspectives that have also been posted elsewhere by members of the NCSG. In particular, I'd like to thank Milton and Kathy for their hard work on this important matter.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">As rapporteur for the CEP I will ensure that suggestions contained herein that may apply to the CEP will be known by members of my group. However, as the CEP is mentioned in the document I don't believe it is appropriate for me to weigh in on consideration of these issues as a member of the PC. I hate being pedantic but I'm in the process of criticising possible conflicts elsewhere in the CCWG and don't want to be put in the position of being accused of the same. Rapporteurs should be as neutral as possible on contentious issues that may be considered in their group's discussions.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">So although I need to abstain in terms of personal PC support for this comment, I do want to commend those responsible for such professional and well considered output. It reflects well upon all of us in the NCSG.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Kind Regards,</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Ed Morris</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 22 Jan 2017, at 19:21, Ayden Férdeline <<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com">icann@ferdeline.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Greetings all,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Please find attached a proposed public comment on the Updated Supplementary Procedures for Independent Review Process (IRP). This response has already been shared on the general NCSG discussion list. Kindly consider reviewing this document and, if necessary, propose any amendments to the PC as a whole and the authors who are cc'd into this message. The deadline for submission is in three days time; 25 January at 23:59 UTC. Thank you!<br></div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,<br></div><div><br></div><div class="protonmail_signature_block "><div class="protonmail_signature_block-user "><div>Ayden Férdeline<br></div><div><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline" title="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline">linkedin.com/in/ferdeline</a><br></div></div><div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br></div></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><IndependentReviewProcess-NCSGPublicComment.docx></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><IndependentReviewProcess-NCSGPublicComment (1).pdf></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>NCSG-PC mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>