<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi Tapani.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">17:00UTC to 21:00 means 2:00JST to 6:00JST. it is unlikely that I will attend at such timing.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-01-13 5:03 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info" target="_blank">ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Amr and Rafik,<br>
<br>
We've got at least two people who can't make it before 1700.<br>
I can do any time from 1700 until 2100.<br>
<br>
Would 1700 be ok for you? Better than later?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Tapani<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:46:41PM +0200, Amr Elsadr (<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a>) wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I would also prefer the call to be at UTC 13:00 or 14:00, if possible.<br>
><br>
> On this from Tapani:<br>
><br>
> > On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <<a href="mailto:ncsg@TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO">ncsg@TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> [SNIP[<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > February Council meeting is on the 16th, preceding Tuesday (14th) is<br>
> > in the middle of the Intersessional. That means we'd pretty much have<br>
> > to have our call on the previous week, maybe Friday the 10th (no<br>
> > opinion on time as yet). Opinions welcome.<br>
><br>
> That should be OK. It’d still be past the deadline to submit motions, and the Council meeting agenda should be available by that date as well. Still…, leaves quite a bit of time for the agenda to change, or motions be amended.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
> Amr<br>
><br>
> > On Jan 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM">rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Hi Tapani.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks, is it possible to have the call at 13:00 or 14:00UTC?<br>
> > Btw for GNSO WGs calls, they are listed in this calendar <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gnso.icann.org/en/<wbr>group-activities/calendar</a> . CCWG subgroups can only use 3 slots (5:00,13:00, 19:00UTC) per day and can be avoided.<br>
> > For the February, a call in Friday will be ok.<br>
> > Best,<br>
> ><br>
> > Rafik<br>
> > On Jan 11, 2017 5:54 PM, "Tapani Tarvainen" <<a href="mailto:ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info">ncsg@tapani.tarvainen.info</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Dear all,<br>
> ><br>
> > Next Council meeting is on 19th, so our policy call should be on the<br>
> > 17th. For time I propose 2100 UTC; there are not many viable<br>
> > alternatives, but please let me know if you can't make that, in<br>
> > particular if there's some overlapping ICANN call; if too many can't<br>
> > make it I'll look for other options (probably means another day).<br>
> ><br>
> > February Council meeting is on the 16th, preceding Tuesday (14th) is<br>
> > in the middle of the Intersessional. That means we'd pretty much have<br>
> > to have our call on the previous week, maybe Friday the 10th (no<br>
> > opinion on time as yet). Opinions welcome.<br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Tapani Tarvainen<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>