[NCSG-PC] Comments on the CCOICI survey

陳曼茹 Manju Chen manju at nii.org.tw
Mon Mar 11 16:15:03 EET 2024


Thank you, Stephanie, for drafting the response!

If no one have raised other opinions until 11 March 23:00UTC, can Julf
please submit the response on behalf of NCSG?


Thank you so much!!


Best,
Manju


On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 19:03 Stephanie E Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Profuse apologies folks, did not realize I had restricted access. SHould
> now be open to anyone with the link, also attached as a word doc just in
> case.  Copying Caleb and Juan and Ben in case they have comments.  Deadline
> is tonight I think?  If anyone has any great ideas on how we could have
> achieved consensus, I am all ears, but I could not think of anything except
> to keep trying.  I do not recommend giving small teams or task forces the
> power to deprive Council of voting something down.  And I could not see how
> we could not have separated out the work that we did reach agreement on, if
> we had had more notice of what the CPs were planning.
>
> cheers Stephanie
> On 2024-03-10 10:24 p.m., 陳曼茹 Manju Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Spephanie,
>
> I can't assess the google doc, guess it'd be the same for others too.
> Maybe if you could simply circulate the response in word document and we
> can suggest edits (if any) in this mailing thread.
>
> Best,
> Manju
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:33 AM Stephanie E Perrin <
> stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote:
>
>> I hope you are all happily home again after a safe and relaxing trip,
>> luggage in tow.  If not, my sympathies.
>>
>> Here is a google doc with my suggested comments on the survey. Frankly,
>> while we are not happy with the outcome of the CCOICI, I cannot see any
>> point in trying out a different structure.  Maybe we can fix the one we
>> have.  Maybe we should have brought in ethics and COI experts to help
>> the task force.  We cannot consider changing the voting procedure at
>> Council, we depend on the ability to object ourselves.  However, we need
>> to not repeat what happened, and we need to get back at fixing the SOIs.
>>
>> Comments welcome, sorry for the delay but I had to go over the meetings
>> and the root documents.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KYB7RxmiYymxnyTxJ74ZOwG0EJ-N0GlwRrOEeiWvSwc/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> cheers Steph Perrin
>>
>> PS I am hopeless with google documents, hate them, so I wont be offended
>> if you tell me I set it up all wrong.  Hopefully you can make suggestions
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240311/574d264f/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list