<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello all,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I have gone through the system and cast my votes in the system. Some are yes, some are no. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But I’m concerned that none of the organizational applications provided any kind of statement of interest, or domain name, or any information at all. Is that because our system is broken and it isn’t being saved when applicants enter in the data? Or do applicants think it is unnecessary to fill out the application? For many of these applicants, there is nothing but the name of an organization supplied and that does not enable us to do our due diligence on them.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Remember that accepting new members requires no “no” votes under our charter. Decisions to accept members must be unanimous.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Robin</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 14, 2022, at 7:55 AM, David Morar <<a href="mailto:davidcristianmorar@gmail.com" class="">davidcristianmorar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Absolutely! I went through some of the applications and have decided to vote no on the following individual members because they do not look to be in fact representing non-commercial perspectives. I may be mistaken, and if that is the case, please let me know, but I think from last time, it was <a class="gmail_plusreply" id="plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org" tabindex="-1">@Robin Gross</a> who pointed out that we have to make sue they are actually representing such perspectives. In any case, the list of folks:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Gabriel Karsan - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Prince Andrew Livingstone Zutah - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Betty Fausta - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Arnold Alimo - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Hafiz Faooq - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Gaurav Vedi - not non-commercial oriented</div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">Separately, one person Jacklyn Appiah Sakyi does not have enough info to figure out if they are in fact non-commercial in their non-egigfa position.</div>
</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But since the vote does not have to be unanimous, I think it's safe to move forward with my no votes, unless others feel similarly. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thank you very much, <br class="">Have a great day, <br class="">David</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">David Morar, PhD<div class=""><div class=""></div></div></div><div class=""><a href="https://twitter.com/morar" target="_blank" class="">@morar</a></div><div class=""><a href="http://davidmorar.com/" target="_blank" class="">davidmorar.com</a></div></div></div></div><br class=""></div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 5:25 PM Johan Helsingius <<a href="mailto:julf@julf.com" class="">julf@julf.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">David,<br class="">
<br class="">
I think you are right, going forward we should use terminal,<br class="">
but considering the backlog and delay we have right now,<br class="">
I think waiting for everyone to go through the somewhat<br class="">
click-intensive process for every applicant in the queue<br class="">
would add a lot of additional delay.<br class="">
<br class="">
I feel we had a chance to discuss the approval during our<br class="">
meeting, we had concerns with a couple of applicants, and<br class="">
Robin asked for some time to review the applications. We<br class="">
agreed on a week. At some point we just have to make a<br class="">
decision and move on.<br class="">
<br class="">
Julf<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
On 14/11/2022 14:59, David Morar wrote:<br class="">
> Julf,<br class="">
> Thank you for your email reminding us about this. I made sure to vote in <br class="">
> the terminal, which also allows for comments. I would suggest we all use <br class="">
> the terminal to vote so that we have a track record for all of this.<br class="">
> Thank you very much,<br class="">
> Have a great day,<br class="">
> David<br class="">
> <br class="">
> David Morar, PhD<br class="">
> @morar <<a href="https://twitter.com/morar" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://twitter.com/morar</a>><br class="">
> <a href="http://davidmorar.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">davidmorar.com</a> <<a href="http://davidmorar.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://davidmorar.com/</a>><br class="">
> <br class="">
> <br class="">
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:21 PM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <br class="">
> <<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank" class="">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank" class="">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>>> wrote:<br class="">
> <br class="">
> Dear EC members,<br class="">
> <br class="">
> It is now two weeks since our meeting. I haven't seen anyone raising<br class="">
> any new issues with the new member applications, so I am assuming we<br class="">
> can go ahead and approve all except the two that we had issues with.<br class="">
> <br class="">
> Julf<br class="">
> _______________________________________________<br class="">
> NCSG-EC mailing list<br class="">
> <a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank" class="">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank" class="">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br class="">
> <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a><br class="">
> <<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a>><br class="">
> <br class="">
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>