<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body vlink="#954F72" link="#0563C1" lang="EN-US">
<p>Just forwarding the notes and action items from the EPDP Legal
committee which I attended yesterday. It was painful, as
expected. Some of the questions are being reformatted. Let me
know if you have any questions. Next EPDP meeting is tomorrow
14:00 UTC<br>
</p>
<p>Stephanie Perrin. <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
<br>
-------- Forwarded Message --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" cellspacing="0"
cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Subject:
</th>
<td>[Gnso-epdp-legal] Notes and action items - EPDP Phase 2A
Legal Committee meeting - 2 Feb 2021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Date: </th>
<td>Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:16:13 +0000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">From: </th>
<td>Caitlin Tubergen <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:caitlin.tubergen@icann.org"><caitlin.tubergen@icann.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">To: </th>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org">gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org"><gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style>@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}</style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Legal
Committee Members:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please find
below the notes and
<a
href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17qLMYb3HC7qGYPQveXbUq5ZSzvedrQ3t8AdVdrRIdrw/edit#gid=0"
moz-do-not-send="true">
action items</a> from today’s call.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thank you.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Best
regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Berry,
Marika, and Caitlin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">--<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">EPDP Phase 2A <o:p>
</o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Legal Committee –
Meeting #01</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Proposed Agenda</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Tuesday
2 February 2021 at 14.00 UTC<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:67.7pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-49.7pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Roll
Call & SOI Updates
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:67.7pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-49.7pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Welcome
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="1" start="2">
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="a" start="1">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">The
first call will be spent on the pre-homework, which
included reviewing the questions assigned to the legal
committee and categorizing them by:
<o:p></o:p></span>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:9.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level3 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Who
should address: legal committee or B&B?<o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:9.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level3 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">If
B&B, what is the priority level (low, medium, or
high)?<o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:9.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level3 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">How
would a response to this question assist the EPDP
Team in answering the questions assigned from the
GNSO Council?<o:p></o:p></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Expenses
related to external counsel<o:p></o:p></span>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:9.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level3 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">First
meeting, questions raised re: funds.
<o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:9.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level3 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Because
this is a shorter-term engagement, unlike Phase 1
and 2, there is no dedicated budget. Important to
note that while there is budget available, these
expenses will be absorbed into the core policy
budget. Ultimately this means EPDP Leadership asks
the group to be conservative with respect to
questions forwarded to B&B.<o:p></o:p></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
</ol>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:67.7pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-49.7pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">3.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Legal
vs. natural
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.75in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">a.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Review
homework provided<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l3
level1 lfo2">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">See
<a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit</a><o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l3
level1 lfo2">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Proponents
to explain provided rationales (why this needs to be
addressed by B&B, or, conversely, how this has already
been addressed)<o:p></o:p></span>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="circle">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><i><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Question 1:
Given that a registrant is already offered the
option to provide consent to publication, wouldn’t
the self-designation as an Organization (with
suitable advance notification of consequences)
result in substantially the same issue/risk for the
Contracted Party?</span></i><i><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></i></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Mechanisms
around consent are quite complex, and this is
something CPs already have to deal with. Publishing
legal information could be a less burdensome measure
as this information is not protected under the GDPR.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">If
CPs required registrants to self-identify, along with
implementing safeguards listed in B&B memo (such
as notification of consequences in plain language,
etc.) An answer to this question is to help address
more of the CPs’ concerns.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">The
issue of consent is complicated by the fact that the
biggest problem noted by B&B is that if you have
personal information in the registrant data, that
might be personal information of someone other than
the person who is registering the name, completing the
info, and receiving the notice.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">The
question of if the registration contains personal
information is what is important, not if it’s a legal
or natural person registrant.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">If
the personal information is personal info of the
person registering and consenting, that would be OK,
but the issue is we do not know if the personal info
provided is the same as the person registering the
name.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Separate
out the two issues we’re talking about. The thrust of
the question is not if a legal person can consent to
publication; the question is asking whether the risk
CPs are already facing in terms of how they deal with
consent is in any way different in magnitude with the
publishing the info of legal persons. This is a
comparison question – is the risk comparable? We want
to make sure that a legal registrant is not somehow
providing personal information that is not its own.
The EPDB has provided guidance and advice and has said
that as we evaluate these policies, we should clearly
instruct legal persons to avoid providing personal
information of other people. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">This
is a policy question and not something our outside
counsel can help with. We already have information on
the challenges, risks, and how to obtain consent
especially in the tricky subject of third-party
consent. This is more appropriate to be discussed in
plenary.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">The
risk scenario is now shifted given the NIS2 directive.
In particular with respect to legal v. natural, there
will be a requirement in European law that contracted
parties make this distinction. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">NIS2
does have language that would play into this quite
directly, we’re still talking about a period of 18
months until it’s agreed to. There will be a few years
before NIS2 comes into play. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Disagree
with this perspective. The ICANN community was behind
the eight ball in updating WHOIS policy b/c of GDP,
and it would be a mistake to ignore an impending
regulation again. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">It’s
not possible to make the differentiation by looking at
what type of person it is. It is hard to make policies
based on laws that might come to pass. Cannot
implement something that is still subject to change,
since this is a directive not a regulation.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">There
is nothing wrong anticipating new developments in the
legal framework. The lesson to be learned post-GDPR is
that we should anticipate developments and that is why
this question is relevant if we want to make policy on
the basis of good analysis.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Cannot
ascertain legal risks until you see how the directive
will be implemented. There is a difference b/w
watching and blowing a legal budget when things are
still in play. A good exercise to go through would be
not that we are finally addressing legal v. natural,
we need to do some risk assessment on what we’re doing
to drive criminal activity. This risk assessment is
not up to the legal committee to decide.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Chair
proposal: clear that some of us interpret the question
somewhat differently. Small group: Laureen, Hadia,
Volker and Becky to further work on this question. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Question
2:
<i>Do the measures required by the Transparency and
Fairness Principles (i.e., explaining that if the
registrant identifies as a legal person then their
data will be published) contribute to mitigating the
liability risk of an inaccurate designation? Note
advice given in Technical Contacts memo (1/22/19 at
¶ 11 “registrars will need to provide notice to the
technical contact within the earlier of one month or
first communication with the data subject.”</i></span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">There
are already principles in place that would mitigate
the liability risk. The advice from B&B talks
about explaining the risks if you are a legal person;
B&B technical contacts memo also discusses giving
notice to those who may have their info published.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Not
entirely certain how this question is different than
the technical contacts memo. That memo mentions
seeking confirmation from someone who may not be the
registrant.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">This
question is a cart before the horse issue b/c it
presumes certain policy decisions that have not been
made. If you determine that legal entity =
publication, you suddenly create an issue for small
legal entities that have the same data as their
company and might result in other legal risks. Need to
determine what this differentiation would mean in
policy before asking this question.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">There
is a policy question about automatic publication is if
someone is designated as a legal person. This question
has been clearly answered in the legal v. natural
memo. Do we already have the answer to this, which is
– yes, this is one thing that could help.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">The
first legal v. natural memo addresses this question –
this is one way to mitigate risk. This comes down to
addressing this question as a plenary. (paragraph 18
in particular)</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">This
question needs refining – agree that these are already
identified as mitigating the risk. Perhaps the better
question is: what is the magnitude of the risk if you
follow the measures proposed by B&B – is it a de
minimis risk or is it a significant risk? Would be
helpful to get more pinpointed guidance on the
magnitude of the risk.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Action:
Laureen to refine question 2 to focus on the magnitude
of the risk.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Question
3:
<i>Legal Memo 1, #25 implies that it is sufficient to
send a confirmation email explaining in clear detail
the implication of the Legal/Natural determination
that the Registrar has made. There is no mention
that this confirmation message needs to be responded
to. Phase 2 Memo #18, although on a somewhat
different topic, implies a positive response is
needed. Please provide clarity as to how lack of
response can be interpreted. Does the situation
change if paper mail is used? Note that in both
cases, the registrant has an obligation to have
provided accurate contact details.</i></span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Question
should be rephrased. The importance of this question:
in order to approve the accuracy of
self-identification, B&B suggested sending a
confirmation email to the registrant and technical
contact. </span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Given
that this is the consequence, does that suffice as
sufficient for this requirement? For the practicality,
it is not hard to implement something like that. Must
first define the consequence, and until this homework
is completed, it’s too early to ask a question.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Suggest
rephrasing the question and bring it back again and
meanwhile we can all think about the consequences.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Is
the question really – can you rely on just this notice
or do you need affirmative consent from an individual
whose contact info is disclosed in the registration of
a legal person?</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Question:
if we send out emails to individuals involved in a
domain name registration and assume a response to the
notification is consent to publication, isn’t coupling
consent with something else? This is a non-starter b/c
we would unduly combine consent with something else –
this would mean it would be coupled, and therefore not
freely given.
</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Not
looking for providing consent with this – it’s a
confirmation email, the response would be
acknowledgement</span><o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-list:l3
level2 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">If
there is no consequence to making this
differentiation, it is legal, but as soon as you
attach a consequence (such as publication), the risk
becomes higher, and this is a plenary discussion.</span><o:p></o:p></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.75in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">b.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Legal
Committee Discussion<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:35.45pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-17.45pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">4.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Feasibility
of unique contacts
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.75in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">a.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Review
homework provided
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:70.9pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-16.9pt;mso-list:l1
level1 lfo3">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">See
<a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UCP86uPZJBA_oh_4lfa6GwisfqnXUgbi5kdq-VOQCS0/edit"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UCP86uPZJBA_oh_4lfa6GwisfqnXUgbi5kdq-VOQCS0/edit</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:70.9pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-16.9pt;mso-list:l1
level1 lfo3">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Proponents
to explain provided rationales (why this needs to be
addressed by B&B, or, conversely, how this has already
been addressed)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:70.9pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="1" start="4">
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="a" start="2">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l0
level2 lfo1">
<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Legal
Committee Discussion<o:p></o:p></span></li>
</ol>
</ol>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:72.1pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.95in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-indent:-50.0pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo1">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><span
style="mso-list:Ignore">5.<span style="font:7.0pt
"Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Wrap
and confirm action items and homework<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="a" start="1">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.25in;mso-list:l2
level1 lfo4"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Confirm
action items and homework</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" type="i" start="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:black;margin-left:.25in;mso-list:l2 level2
lfo4">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">LC members to review the
<a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vofZIqnY-xCaKMte1q_tiAwAfGwkwsu1/edit"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Feasibility of Unique Contacts terminology table</a>
and provide edits or additional clarification, if
deemed necessary, by Friday, 5 February.
<u><o:p></o:p></u></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:black;margin-left:.25in;mso-list:l2 level2
lfo4">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Becky, Laureen, and
Volker to review <a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Question 1</a> in the Legal v. Natural Table and
provide updates based on the Legal Committee’s
discussion. The updated version is due by Monday, 8
February in time for the next Legal Committee meeting.<u><o:p></o:p></u></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:black;margin-left:.25in;mso-list:l2 level2
lfo4">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Laureen to review <a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Question 2</a> in the Legal v. Natural Table and
update the text based on the magnitude of the risk by
Monday, 8 February.
<u><o:p></o:p></u></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:black;margin-left:.25in;mso-list:l2 level2
lfo4">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">LC members to revisit the
questions for <a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Legal v. Natural</a> and <a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UCP86uPZJBA_oh_4lfa6GwisfqnXUgbi5kdq-VOQCS0/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Feasibility</a> in advance of the next meeting and,
taking into account the discussion from the meeting as
well as the limited budget, provide additional
feedback as to why outside counsel review is necessary
and would assist in moving the plenary team forward on
GNSO Council instructions. Additionally, LC members
may wish to rephrase questions if they believe edits
may provide additional clarity.<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.75in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.75in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>