<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br>I regard this as a precursor to the fight we are going to have on the GNSO review. “studying overlap” means getting rid of one of our constituencies. Do i spend any of my scarce political capital trying to get the cp house to support us?<div>Steph<br><div dir="ltr">Sent from spend iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br>Begin forwarded message:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><b>From:</b> Barbara Wanner <bwanner@uscib.org><br><b>Date:</b> August 13, 2020 at 09:23:30 EDT<br><b>To:</b> Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@Verisign.com>, "aheineman@godaddy.com" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "Donna.Austin@team.neustar" <Donna.Austin@team.neustar>, "Selli, Claudia" <claudia.selli@intl.att.com>, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wuknoben@gmail.com>, Dean Marks <ed4coa@gmail.com>, Stephanie E Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns@GMAIL.COM>, Joan Kerr <joankerr@fbsc.org>, "jennifer.taylor@bt.com" <jennifer.taylor@bt.com><br><b>Cc:</b> Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>, "bc-excomm@icann.org" <bc-excomm@icann.org>, Barbara Wanner <bwanner@uscib.org><br><b>Subject:</b> <b>Following Up RE NomCom RIWG Recommendation: BC Supports IPC Proposed Way Forward</b><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoNoSpacing, li.MsoNoSpacing, div.MsoNoSpacing
{mso-style-priority:1;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Dear GNSO Colleagues:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">The BC has conferred internally, and we would like to express our support for the IPC’s proposed way forward, which was offered by Heather Forrest during our 6 August call. That is,
</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt">to maintain the status quo while a holistic review of the NomCom is undertaken to examine constituency overlaps, among other issues, as called for in Recommendation 10.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">We feel the IPC proposal would serve as a very solid foundation for building a GNSO-wide consensus on the GNSO RIWG Recommendation, which it seems none of the GNSO constituencies supports. We further agree
with the point made by Heather that resolving the matter via the Empowered Community (EC) process likely would be even more problematic as well as drawn out, in addition to opening the door to
<i>non-GNSO</i> members influencing the outcome of a matter that concerns GNSO representation on the NomCom.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">BC members asked that I include my 6 August comments (below), since they provide important historical background concerning the allocation of small and large business seats to the BC on the NomCom as well
as underscore the legitimate representational needs of SMEs. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">In view of the 21 August deadline, we thought it best to try and get the ball rolling to build a GNSO-wide consensus on this very important matter. Happy to discuss further.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Barbara Wanner<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">BC Representative to the CSG<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Historical Background on BC NomCom Representation<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><o:p> </o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The BC’s NomCom representation was agreed in 2002, during a time when the GNSO was called the Names Council (NC). The BC held a seat on the NC then.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">At that time, <span style="color:black">almost all constituencies represented on the NC were dominated by big business of various sorts. For example, the Registry group was dominated by Verisign, the ISPs by major telcos, and the Registrars
by a core group of large companies. The BC, however, was the only constituency that included both large companies (e.g., IBM, other global multinationals)
<u>and </u>SME’s as direct members and via associations such as AIM and the International Chamber of Commerce.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As we know, the Nominating Committee was created in response to a recognized need to legitimize the selection of the ICANN Board after a highly problematic and ultimately failed global vote. The BC’s representative
on the NC therefore asserted that <u>an elected ICANN Board via a Nom Com would lack legitimacy</u> if it was simply decided by big business and the supply-side interests it was supposed to manage. Only the BC could make claim to the voice of 1000s of small
users. Thus, without an SME voice, the legitimization objective of a NomCom selected ICANN Board would be compromised. Hence, the BC was given two seats on the NomCom, one representing large business; the other representing small business.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Importance of SME Representation<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In 2020, the BC maintains that the digital transformation of the entire economy in the past 18 years has further increased the number and diversity of small start-ups which now participate in the market alongside
the tech giants. The SME seat therefore continues to be critical to ensuring that legitimate selection of the ICANN Board, in our view.</span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Business is not just a broad category, but an expanding one. We are seeing new and smaller businesses arise even as larger, legacy companies keep their footing. For that reason alone, separate seats on the Nominating Committee make sense.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">The maintenance of a Small Business seat for the BC is more than a historical artifact. The BC Small Business representation exists because compared to any stakeholder group involved in this process, they are the ones most different
from their peers and, as such, need to have their voices represented separately.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">It is essential for the SME community that startups and small businesses – disproportionately Global South voices serving Global South customers, the future of our industry – have active input in all processes, especially one as important
as the choices made by the NomCom. These newer voices of business simply couldn’t be captured should the small business voice be extinguished by the proposed change.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Arguing over whether a group should have two seats or one seat or five seats or no seats misses the point. Deficiencies in the ability of the Nominating Committee to deliver on its mission has far less to do with artificial balance than
it does with adequate subject matter expertise and reach. The reason having a small business member and a large business member on the Nominating Committee has worked so well is the aligned but widely different perspective each brings to the task.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:19 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com>; aheineman@godaddy.com; Donna.Austin@team.neustar; Selli, Claudia <claudia.selli@intl.att.com>; Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wuknoben@gmail.com>; Dean Marks <ed4coa@gmail.com>;
Barbara Wanner <bwanner@uscib.org>; Stephanie E Perrin <stephanie.perrin@MAIL.UTORONTO.CA>; Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>; Joan Kerr <joankerr@fbsc.org>; jennifer.taylor@bt.com<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Following up: NomCom RIWG call with GNSO community leaders (22 July 2020)<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear GNSO community leaders,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We write to follow up on the call that you did with Tom Barrett, Cheryl Langdon Orr and Zahid Jamil (chairs of the NomCom Review Implementation Working Group) last week. We understand that many groups are continuing to discuss the topic
and may wish to communicate individually with the NomCom RIWG. As members of the Policy Team that supports your governance work, however, we thought we should ask if you would like us to convene a call for you as GNSO community group leaders.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We ask also because the NomCom RIWG may be expecting a response from the GNSO community about their proposal to amend the Bylaws. In addition, it may be helpful to see if there are alternative options that you can suggest to the RIWG for
their consideration.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please let us know if you would like us to schedule a call for you. We will also be grateful if you can respond to Chantelle’s query (below) about posting the materials from the call with Tom, Cheryl and Zahid to the RIWG’s public mailing
list. Thank you!<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Chantelle, Carlos & Mary <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Chantelle Doerksen <<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 18:14<br>
<b>To: </b>"Drazek, Keith" <<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com">aheineman@godaddy.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com">aheineman@godaddy.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar">Donna.Austin@team.neustar</a>"
<<a href="mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar">Donna.Austin@team.neustar</a>>, "Selli, Claudia" <<a href="mailto:claudia.selli@intl.att.com">claudia.selli@intl.att.com</a>>, Heather Forrest <<a href="mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com">haforrestesq@gmail.com</a>>,
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <<a href="mailto:wuknoben@gmail.com">wuknoben@gmail.com</a>>, Dean Marks <<a href="mailto:ed4coa@gmail.com">ed4coa@gmail.com</a>>, Barbara Wanner <<a href="mailto:bwanner@uscib.org">bwanner@uscib.org</a>>, Stephanie E Perrin <<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@MAIL.UTORONTO.CA">stephanie.perrin@MAIL.UTORONTO.CA</a>>,
Bruna Martins dos Santos <<a href="mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com">bruna.mrtns@gmail.com</a>>, Joan Kerr <<a href="mailto:joankerr@fbsc.org">joankerr@fbsc.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:jennifer.taylor@bt.com">jennifer.taylor@bt.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:jennifer.taylor@bt.com">jennifer.taylor@bt.com</a>>,
Tom Barrett <<a href="mailto:tbarrett@encirca.com">tbarrett@encirca.com</a>>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <<a href="mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com">langdonorr@gmail.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:internet@jamilandjamil.com">internet@jamilandjamil.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:internet@jamilandjamil.com">internet@jamilandjamil.com</a>>,
Carlos Reyes <<a href="mailto:carlos.reyes@icann.org">carlos.reyes@icann.org</a>>, Lars Hoffmann <<a href="mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org">lars.hoffmann@icann.org</a>>, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <<a href="mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org">jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org</a>>,
"Larisa B. Gurnick" <<a href="mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org">larisa.gurnick@icann.org</a>>, Mary Wong <<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org">mary.wong@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Chantelle Doerksen <<a href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>NomComRIWG and GNSO SG/C leadership call materials: attendance, recording, chat | Wednesday, 22 July 2020<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Dear all,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Below are the call materials from the NomComRIWG and GNSO SG/C leadership call held on Wednesday, 22 July 2020.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Question:</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> There is a request to see if this group agrees to share the enclosed call materials with the entire NomComRIWG for their own discussions, via posting
the materials below to the NomComRIWG’s public mailing list. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Please let us know what your thoughts are. Thank you in advance.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Best,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Chantelle </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Attendance</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">: Ashley Heineman, Barbara Wanner, Bruna Santos, Carlos Reyes, Chantelle Doerksen, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Donna Austin, Heather Forrest, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez,
Jenn Taylor Hodges, Keith Drazek, Lars Hoffmann, Marie-Noemie Marques, Mary Wong, Tom Barrett, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, Zahid Jamil</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Zoom Recording:</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<a href="https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/w9REDrH81VJLQKfgxB2ceJUcENvEaaa81yRNqfUFmhnVsyK_O90mtDdkHaSucEMi">https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/w9REDrH81VJLQKfgxB2ceJUcENvEaaa81yRNqfUFmhnVsyK_O90mtDdkHaSucEMi</a>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> <br>
<b>Chat:</b></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:02:37 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Good to go then</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:14:25 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : and the Independent Examiner was noting the lack of NPOC representation specifically</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:15:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : GNSO of course still has the largest influence as such with its 7 seats</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:15:34 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : next is 5 with ALAC Regional interests</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:15:54 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : then the rest is no more than 2</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:15:59 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : mostly 1</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:17:45 From Wolf-Ulrich Knoben : What is the rationale for keeping the NCA number limited by 19?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:18:45 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : it is an approved recommendation of the Independent Examiner @Wolf-Urlich
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:01 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : we mearly Implement those Board approved recommendations</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:07 From Wolf-Ulrich Knoben : Thanks Cheryl</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:12 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : NP</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:29 From Heather Forrest : Further to Donna's point we do not have a mechanism for doing this selection, and this is not within scope of the GNSO Council (which is tasked with managing the
policy development process)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:32 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : That was the Ind Examiners observation</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:19:50 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : perfect solution @Donna</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:20:11 From Wolf-Ulrich Knoben : @Donna +1
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:20:27 From Mary Wong : @Heather, the distinction with the Council’s remit is why the request was addressed to the SG & C chairs, with Keith (as GNSO Chair) cc’d for information.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:20:45 From Heather Forrest : Very much appreciated, Mary</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:28:19 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : This was not a negotiation we want your feedback however specifically on the proposed bylaw language</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:28:45 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I was assuring you we have explored as many possabilities as we can</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:28:55 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : this leaves the GNSO seat # as is</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:29:03 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : the most palatable we felt</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:29:20 From Heather Forrest : Is there a documented concern from GNSO (not from an outside consultant) that the GNSO wants control? Or that the GNSO SG/Cs themselves feel the need for change?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:30:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I believe the Ind Examiners report was acting based specifically on concerns or complaints from part(s) of the GNSO</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:31:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : that documentation can perhaps be sorced from MSSI</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:31:25 From Heather Forrest : @Cheryl - sorry to push, but bylaws amendment means we need to be more than just "I believe" - such a major decision requires evidence-based decision making</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:31:41 From Heather Forrest : I think we need to chase the documentation down</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:32:19 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : ALSO note there will be other bylaw changes required as a result of our required Implementation of these 27 Recs, so *IF* the Rec 10 results in a Bylaws change
it can go woth that set</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:32:23 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : with</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:33:12 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Correct @Kieth</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:34:27 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : It could rotate all its seats or any combination therein year by year if you so wish</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:34:52 From Mary Wong : @Heather, Policy staff will consult with our MSSI colleagues regarding the documentation you requested.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:35:05 From Barbara Wanner : Thanks Keith -- great point about political sensitivities in light of all that we must address now from a policy standpoint.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:35:10 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : weunderstand the friction point issue but US implementing a change from the outside may have an effect as well (I strongly suspect)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:35:31 From Jean-Baptiste Deroulez : As a follow-up to Cheryl’s comment above, here is the link to the independent examiner final report on rec. 10:
<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-review-final-05jun18-en.pdf">
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-review-final-05jun18-en.pdf</a> , see p25-26.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:35:45 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Thanks @JPD</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:36:20 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : JBD</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:37:11 From Heather Forrest : Thanks very much, Jean-Baptiste. Is there "a comprehensive</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">assessment of representation within the ICANN community, including a full understanding of the</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">history and possible future of representation within the SOs/ACs" as per that recommendation 10 p 25?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:37:22 From Heather Forrest : Great question, Donna, thank you</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:40:49 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : That COuld occur at a future holistic ICANN wide review point I suspect @Heather</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:41:07 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : we are trapped between hstory and change</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:42:19 From Heather Forrest : My fault, Tom, for not being more specific - sorry</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:43:13 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : and some of their earlier presentations might also give background as well, again MSSI have the links to hand I suspect</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:43:54 From Heather Forrest : +1 Donna - likewise - very much appreciate the additional information</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:43:59 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Thanks everyone we really appreciate al your time as well.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:44:24 From Barbara Wanner : Appreciate the time you gave us to think this through further!</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:44:29 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : We understand @Donna</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:44:55 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : We thought not @Donna</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:07 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Bye for now</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:07 From Barbara Wanner : @ Heather agree and thank you!</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:09 From Donna Austin, Neustar : Thanks all</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:09 From Ashley Heineman : thanks.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:10 From Heather Forrest : bye all, thank you</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:14 From Wolf-Ulrich Knoben : thanks and bye</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:19 From Jean-Baptiste Deroulez : Work of the NomComRIWG can be followed here:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/aBpIBg">https://community.icann.org/x/aBpIBg</a>. thank you.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">14:46:21 From Bruna Santos : thanks and byw</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>