<div dir="ltr">Okay he's definitely over the fence. I will reach out to him with the language I mentioned above (adding to the list of issues whatever else he's been spouting since this morning) at 5pm EST today if I do not receive objections by then.<div><br></div><div>I am also thinking that "soft-closing" the thread might be a good idea at this point. It is not going anywhere, anyway, and I feel like by feeding him we'll just keep rolling...</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:19 PM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <<a href="mailto:rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com">rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>This was not my initial interpretation of his message either, but I can see how and why you can interpret it that way Steph. </div><div><br></div><div>But I'm not sure that the point you are raising should be addressed in the context of the EC. It has ramifications into both your history as a NCSG chair, and the "issues" with our rigid gender rules that now put you in a situation where you are (almost) elected by default. The interpretation you put forward is legitimate in your circumstances, but it has to be inferred, from a rather complex situation and long-standing situation. Whats going on with Vaibhav though is rather straightforward and can be addressed right away.</div><div><br></div><div>This is what I plan to send him later today, with your agreement:</div><div><br></div><div>"Vaibhav,</div><div><br></div><div>We are writing to you regarding the post you made on the NCSG mailing list at 11:50 EST in the "NCSG Election Clarifications" thread.</div><div><br></div><div>After reviewing the content of your post, we find it to be in violation of both the NCSG Charter and the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior.</div><div><br></div><div>Article 1.2 d) of the NCSG Charter reads as follows:</div><div>"Behavioral expectations of all NCSG members, include without limitation: adhering to ICANN Bylaws/Policies; supporting the bottom-up consensus model; treating others with dignity, respect, and courtesy; listening attentively and seeking to understand others; acting with honesty, sincerity, and integrity."</div><div><br></div><div>Your recent interventions on the mailing list were generally borderline regarding these Charter committments, and the one we referred to above constitutes a direct violation. </div><div><br></div><div>We would kindly ask you to reconsider how you understand your involvement with NCSG and withdraw the personal attacks, accusations and threats you made in that post. </div><div><br></div><div>Any further post on the NCSG mailing list which would be found in violation of the NCSG Charter could lead to your suspension from the mailing list and a further review of your membership status by the NCSG Executive Committee.</div><div><br></div><div>We thank you in advance for your cooperation on this matter.</div><div><br></div><div>Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix, on behalf of the NCSG Executive Committee</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:53 PM Robin Gross via NCSG-EC <<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>I didn’t interpret Milton’s message as being hurtful but more of what we face every election - people imaging ways of using the existing ballot and rules to achieve various results. It isn’t the first time we’ve had abstain / NOTA conversations and probably won’t be the last.<div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Robin<br><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jun 2, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Stephanie E Perrin via NCSG-EC <<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>> wrote:</div><br><div>
<div><p>I just responded to James' comment, in hopes that this would
douse the flames. I also resent the thread of reminders about the
election process....I trust it made it to the list.</p><p>I agree that whoever this Agarwal guy is, an offlist note is
required. I would really appreciate it if you did it, because
frankly it looks like I am retaliating and might serve to escalate
matters.</p><p>I also think Milton is out of line. I am well aware of how much
he would like me not to run, but to suggest to the list that they
send me a message about how unwelcome I am, by voting
abstain....well, besides being hurtful, I think it is a kind of
electioneering that ought to be discouraged. Encourage people to
vote for your candidate of choice, sure.</p><p>I also think that encouraging me to step down so the EC can
appoint the person they really want raises all kinds of questions
about how fair the election process is.</p><p>Just my two cents.</p><p>SP<br>
</p>
<div>On 2020-06-02 12:57 p.m., Raphael
Beauregard-Lacroix via NCSG-EC wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What he said to Milton is disrespectful, and contains
specific accusations as well as threats. I think he needs to
be reminded off-list of the expected standards of behavior at
ICANN and encouraged to withdraw what he said and eventually
apologize. If he keeps lashing on, then to me thats a case of
temporary suspension from the mailing list with further review
on our side. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Milton is harsh, and I also think he should exercise
restraint in such circumstances, and it would be fair game to
remind him. His point could be made without certain words,
irrespective of their being "true" or not. But Vaibhav's
surely went way over the line as far as standards of behavior
are concerned, much more than Milton ever did. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I know you don't like to play the cop Steph, but I do think
it's required, unfortunately. If you don't feel like it, I can
volunteer, or someone else can go ahead too.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But let's quickly discuss first; let me know what you all
think.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Have a nice day, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
NCSG-EC mailing list
<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>NCSG-EC mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br><a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-EC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>