<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<br>
Dear All,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please see below. <br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<div>—</div>
<div>Many thanks,</div>
<div><b><br>
</b></div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><b><br>
</b></span></div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><b>Maryam Bakoshi</b> | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator </span></div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><b>ICANN</b> | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers </span></div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><b>S</b>: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | <b>T</b>: +44 7846 471777</span></div>
</div>
<div><br>
Begin forwarded message:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Sorry if I wasn't clear. Yes, I thought that some of NCSG comments were considered in the final report. E.g., if I recall correctly, NCSG made a point on issue of imbalances in Nomcom composition (e.g., lack of NPOC). In the final report, the
IE found that the NomCom may not accurately represent constituencies, and recommended that Nomcom composition be re-balanced immediately and then again every five years.<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for the good wishes, I'm sure I'll need them!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- B<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:30 PM Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Brenden,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>thanks for the update.</div>
<div>as you know we had that meeting with nomcom in Panama, let's say it was positive and there are some actions items :)</div>
<div>for the report, we get the NCSG comment and expressed some concerns as you know. but do you mean that were considered in the final version? the person who was vocal for those comments is our comrade Farzi.</div>
<div>being in the GNSO Review WG which is also about implementation, I can only wish you good luck with RWP :)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rafik<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">---------- Forwarded message ---------<br>
From: <strong class="gmail_sendername" dir="auto">Maryam Bakoshi via NCSG-EC</strong>
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>></span><br>
Date: mar. 10 juil. 2018 à 01:01<br>
Subject: [NCSG-EC] FW: [Ext] Auto-discard notification<br>
To: NCSG EC <<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
Dear All,<br>
<br>
Please see attached.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Many thanks,<br>
<br>
Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator <br>
ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers <br>
S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777<br>
<br>
<br>
On 09/07/2018, 16:59, "NCSG-EC on behalf of <a href="mailto:ncsg-ec-bounces@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">
ncsg-ec-bounces@lists.ncsg.is</a>" <<a href="mailto:mailman-bounces@listat.effi.org" target="_blank">mailman-bounces@listat.effi.org</a> on behalf of
<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec-bounces@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec-bounces@lists.ncsg.is</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
The attached message has been automatically discarded.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Brenden Kuerbis <<a href="mailto:bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org" target="_blank">bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org</a>><br>
To: NCUC Executive Committee <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, <<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>><br>
Cc: <br>
Bcc: <br>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 11:59:12 -0400<br>
Subject: Nomcom Review Working Party enters feasibility assessment phase<br>
<div dir="ltr">Dear NCUC EC,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I wanted to give you a brief update on the work of the Nomcom Review Working Party (RWP). Those of you who attended Panama were probably made aware again that the Independent Evaluator's Final Report was released. I thought non-commercial actors put forward
very informative comments as to the draft report, and I found the Final Report recommendations to reflect many of them. Thanks for shepherding those comments.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The RWP's next task is to complete a feasibility assessment of the recommendations made in the report. I have decided to continue on for this phase, along with some of my RWP colleagues in order to provide continuity. It requires bi-monthly meetings for
the next several months. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>An initial step, to be completed this week, is a polling of the continuing RWP members t<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14.666666984558105px">o gauge views on importance of recommendations, ease of implementation,
and budgetary implications</span>. I generally feel that the report was well done and that all the recommendations made are important and achievable. I will take guidance from the comments previously submitted by NCSG in answering this poll. If you have any
specific concerns about any recommendation(s), please feel free to reach out to me on or off list ASAP. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,<br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">---------------------------------------<br>
Brenden Kuerbis<br>
Internet Governance Project<br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__internetgovernance.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=1A9IIOkJia11FXDmJ1R4Jn7wGT4ExHiVuBF89mvNt_Q&m=D-Cx3pE9icRhzFqI8xYZzO36rxUMMCxST9B6fRXyY5Y&s=JUNn2wnOll9NExyOYbdkBVThd72bXedimofxuDXHzAw&e=" target="_blank">http://internetgovernance.org
[internetgovernance.org]</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
Internet Governance Project<br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__internetgovernance.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=1A9IIOkJia11FXDmJ1R4Jn7wGT4ExHiVuBF89mvNt_Q&m=sixeFkUACV2dMyUUQKzUzNCrRn0KOo-28kuD4cp5EhM&s=cl52kwGkvXTjiPEg2Bki_9J-8lv6mhJiz3Dx3NX8a4g&e=" target="_blank">http://internetgovernance.org
[internetgovernance.org]</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-EC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.ncsg.is_mailman_listinfo_ncsg-2Dec&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=1A9IIOkJia11FXDmJ1R4Jn7wGT4ExHiVuBF89mvNt_Q&m=D-Cx3pE9icRhzFqI8xYZzO36rxUMMCxST9B6fRXyY5Y&s=V8CS96TSx_bxkZUOA5fLsX0t6VTjKUvtZuuqq-GkXzU&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
[lists.ncsg.is]</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>