<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks everyone for the comments. Since today is the deadline to respond, I assume that we can support 3 representatives for each SO/AC while we know that won't resolve the representation issue we observed before.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 9 sept. 2026 à 21:28, James Olorundare <<a href="mailto:000021289e487eb9-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu">000021289e487eb9-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:large"><span style="border-style:none;background:none">Plu1 ,</span> I guess this will bring more inclusivity and visibility.</div><div style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">Thank you.</div><div style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">James Kunle Olorundare</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 8:18 AM Thato Mfikwe <<a href="mailto:00002377724dd2f3-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu" target="_blank">00002377724dd2f3-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Tomslin,<div><br></div><div><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">I support increasing to three representatives per SO/AC to
improve engagement, diversity, continuity and deliberation quality, furthermore
there must be possibilities of seat sharing across ACs and SOs on a rotation basis. </p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">SOs and ACs can adopt nomination practices that intentionally
rotate one slot to NCSG-affiliated participants as this will allow broader
internal constituency inclusion.</p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Thato.</p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br></p></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 12:20 AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <<a href="mailto:000021eed209b057-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu" target="_blank">000021eed209b057-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><div>Hi <span class="gmail_chip gmail_plusreply" dir="auto"><a href="mailto:benakin@gmail.com" style="color:rgb(17,85,204);text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">@Benjamin Akinmoyeje</a></span><span> </span></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I am still building my thoughts, so I don't have a preference yet but I would like to use your thoughts to help build mine, if you don't mind 😊. In theory, my best case scenario should be one which somehow improves the chances of an NCSG member being one of the representatives. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">You said 3 representatives will "<i>ensure proper consideration and representation by the SO/ACs</i>". In the case of GNSO specifically, how might it significantly increase the chances of NCSG representation in practice, compared to the current 2 reps scenario, considering that GNSO has 4 stakeholder groups (SG)? </div><div dir="auto">If it doesn't, is there a risk that we might inadvertently exacerbate our current concerns of representation (I can't remember what our concern is for this specific team) or could we come up with an operating procedure in GNSO that ensures that there is some kind of reps rotation that is fair to all SGs?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Your thoughts to these questions would be appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>Remain blessed, <br>Tomslin</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 8 Sept 2026, 23:14 Benjamin Akinmoyeje, <<a href="mailto:00001df8ed30e9c4-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu" target="_blank">00001df8ed30e9c4-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear Chair,<div>Thank you for sharing this request for input, I will recommend that we have 3 representatives for SO/ACs in Accountability and Transparency and On-Demand Reviews in the future program of reviews.</div><div><br></div><div>This ensures proper consideration and representation by the SO/ACs, as well as broader engagement.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Benjamin </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 12:51 AM Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:00001e06d4af460b-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">00001e06d4af460b-dmarc-request@listserv.syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>We have a request for input from the Review of Reviews Cross Community Group regarding the composition of the review teams. The topic of representation is something we raised concerns about previously.</div><div>Please let me know your thoughts.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">---------- Forwarded message ---------<br><br></div><div><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Hi all,</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Members of the Review of Reviews CCG have been asked to solicit input from our SO/ACs on their preferred composition of the Accountability and Transparency and On-Demand Reviews in the future program of reviews. </div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
As set out in the below email from the CCG Chairs, the CCG would like to understand if there is a clear or strong preference for either up to 3 representatives from each SO/AC or up to 2 representatives from each SO/AC, or if there are no strong feelings. </div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Please share this with your groups and provide any feedback to me and/or Osvaldo by 11 September. I will share this to SG/C lists where I can, but I would appreciate you sharing where I do not have access. </div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
As always, I am available to speak with your groups about the work of the CCG and please feel free to reach out. </div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Thanks, </div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Sophie</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div id="m_3453772855343324809m_3862856406719062729m_-1518330344604854898m_-6509940048427669432m_5916826591459005869m_-8703973309373230048Signature">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Poppins Semibold",Arial,sans-serif">Sophie Hey
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Poppins Light",Arial,sans-serif">she/her</span><span style="font-family:"Poppins Semibold",Arial,sans-serif"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Poppins Light",Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(149,7,52)">Senior Policy Advisor</span><span style="font-family:"Poppins Semibold",Arial,sans-serif"><br>
Com Laude<br></span><br></div></td></tr></tbody></table>
</div>
<div id="m_3453772855343324809m_3862856406719062729m_-1518330344604854898m_-6509940048427669432m_5916826591459005869m_-8703973309373230048appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="m_3453772855343324809m_3862856406719062729m_-1518330344604854898m_-6509940048427669432m_5916826591459005869m_-8703973309373230048divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><br><div> </div>
</div>
<div lang="en-BE">
<div>
<p><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">Sent on behalf of Reviews CCG Co-Chairs</span></u></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Dear Reviews CCG Members,</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">As discussed on call #45, w</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">e would like to ask you to liaise with your respective SO/ACs to take a sounding on their preferred
approach to the composition of review teams conducting Accountability and Transparency Reviews and On-Demand Reviews.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Specifically, </span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">we would </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">need</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> views
on whether each SO/AC should be able to appoint:</span></p>
<ul type="disc" style="margin-top:0cm">
<li style="color:black"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">Up to t</span><span style="font-size:12pt">wo representatives, consistent with the current model for</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"> the</span><span style="font-size:12pt"> </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">Review
of Reviews </span><span style="font-size:12pt">cross</span><span style="font-size:12pt">
</span><span style="font-size:12pt">community group; or</span></li><li style="color:black"><span style="font-size:12pt">Up to three representatives,</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"> as suggested in our first draft Report</span><span style="font-size:12pt">.</span></li></ul>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">The</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> large</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> size of review teams was raised as a concern</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> by
some</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> in the public comment. Before further refining this aspect of the proposal, we would therefore like to better understand the preferences of the respective SO/ACs and whether there is a clear preference
for either approach.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">We would be grateful if you could take this question back to your respective groups and report </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">back</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> to
the CCG</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">, if possible by the end of next week</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Many thanks for your help in gathering this input.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Best</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> regards</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Avri, Chris and Manal</span><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"> </span></p>
<p><br></p></div></div></div>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><div><br clear="all"></div><div><br></div><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Kunle Olorundare (MNSE, PRINCE2)</div><div><a href="tel:+234%20803%20655%201591" value="+2348036551591" target="_blank">+2348036551591</a></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>