<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi everyone,</div><div><br></div>The IFR2 draft report was posted for public comment , you can find more details below:<div><ul><li><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-ifr2-initial-report-20-03-2025">https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-ifr2-initial-report-20-03-2025 </a></li><li><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-requests-feedback-on-initial-report-20-03-2025-en">https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-requests-feedback-on-initial-report-20-03-2025-en</a></li></ul><div><br><div>I am the NCSG representative to the IFR and as I shared last week at the ICANN meeting, I don't believe there is any concerning point in what is proposed as recommendations. However, I would like to ask our  members who were involved in the IANA stewardship transition, PTI and CSC to chime in and review the report in order to assist with the NCSG comment.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div><div><br></div></div>