<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Anyone who is interested in New gTLD Registry Public Interest
    <div class="moz-forward-container">Commitments (PICs) and Registry
      Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) should tune<br>
      into the ICANN Board's Webinar tomorrow, Monday, 18 Dec,
      19:00–20:30<br>
      UTC, link at<br>
      <a
href="https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-framework-for-public-interest-and-registry-voluntary-commitments-11-12-2023-en">https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-framework-for-public-interest-and-registry-voluntary-commitments-11-12-2023-en<br>
      </a><br>
      This is an issue to which NCSG and NCUC have devoted A LOT of time
      in<br>
      the last decade. A dozen years ago, in the First Round of New
      gTLDs,<br>
      some horrible "voluntary commitments" were submitted by New gTLD<br>
      applicants and we have been concerned ever since. Undermining the
      public<br>
      interest, undermining fair and balanced policies, and undermining
      the<br>
      Multistakeholder Model must not be allowed in future
      "commitments."<br>
      <br>
      <u>A few of the many documents sharing our concerns:<br>
      </u><br>
      In the last two NCUC Anniversary Issues Forums, we actively shared<br>
      concerns and urged ICANN to revisit the issue of PICs and RVCs -
      and our<br>
      session at ICANN78 in Hamburg is recorded and available online. We
      are<br>
      glad to see ICANN answering these calls!<br>
      <br>
      The Big Question Facing ICANN’s Contractual Governance Regime,
      Milton<br>
      Mueller, _"Some interest groups (mainly Registries and GAC) want
      ICANN<br>
      to be empowered to enforce compliance with Registry Voluntary<br>
      Commitments (RVCs), formerly known as Public Interest Commitments<br>
      (PICs). Civil society groups and some Internet businesses see in
      the<br>
      proposed change a threat to freedom of expression on the internet
      and an<br>
      attempt to undermine ICANN’s multistakeholder policy development<br>
      process."<br>
_<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.internetgovernance.org/2023/06/15/the-big-question-facing-icanns-contractual-governance-regime/">https://www.internetgovernance.org/2023/06/15/the-big-question-facing-icanns-contractual-governance-regime/</a><br>
      <br>
      The Sad Story of Private Public Interest Commitments (PICs), Kathy<br>
      Kleiman,<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://circleid.com/posts/20200311-the-sad-story-of-private-public-interest-commitments-pics#fn6">https://circleid.com/posts/20200311-the-sad-story-of-private-public-interest-commitments-pics#fn6</a><br>
      <br>
      ---<br>
      <br>
      The Webinar will most certainly be recorded if you cannot attend
      during<br>
      this busy days.<br>
      <br>
      Happy Holidays!<br>
      <br>
      Kathy<br>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>