<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I think it would be good to reinforce the idea that small teams
      must have balanced stakeholder representation, and that it is
      doubly important in small teams for SOIs to be transparent, and
      that members must reveal (even if to an escrow agent) who they are
      working for.  The reality is that full committee or council review
      of complex matters that have been distilled in small teams is
      never as good as full participation.  Further, those small teams
      should be fully transparent to outside observation of meetings. 
      Several have been closed meetings, and this is counter to the open
      and transparent principles on which ICANN is based.</p>
    <p>Thanks for your work on this!</p>
    <p>Stephanie Perrin<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2023-03-13 9:19 a.m., farzaneh badii
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN1qJvBwuAu_2eGsCuBVAyoX-OaOJ-ZBcK2+-Qb5nNB1SZx8UQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">All,</div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">We
          have an NCSG board meeting today and the Board is asking a
          peculiar question:</div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">“The ICANN
            Board would like to explore how to</span><br
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
          <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">combine
            the efficiencies of an agile approach to problem solving,
            like</span><br
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
          <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">the
            Council’s small teams, with the need for accountability and</span><br
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
          <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">transparency,
            to make progress on policy conversations. When would such</span><br
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
          <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">an
            approach be most appropriate and how can we ensure that it
            does not</span><br
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
          <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">circumvent
            required steps in a policy development process? »</span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">We discussed
            this during the NCSG meeting yesterday. In a nutshell we
            don't think an "agile approach" that is not predicted in the
            bylaws is appropriate at all. If the Board wants to make the
            processes more efficient and effective, they can refrain
            from re-opening the issues and rehashing the policy
            recommendations that we make in policy development
            processes. Also adding layers and layers of implementation
            and enforcement processes such as ODAs don't help with
            efficiency. Unfortunately the push for efficiency and the
            board desire to re-open issues or be creative in resolving
            unsolved matters has led to creating processes that are ad
            hoc and might not be in accordance with the bylaws. One such
            group that the board created and we objected to is the group
            on closed generics. (<b>we need to discuss this point)</b></span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>this is my
              opinion which we can discuss:</b></span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">The Council's
            small teams are not "agile processes". They are internal
            processes that don't violate the bylaws because the small
            teams don't make the decision, they just lay the groundwork
            for decision-making at the council level and they have to
            discuss all the issues with the council. </span><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">Please
          weigh in so that we can wrap it up by 3 PM. Also what's with
          the obsession with the word "agile". Somebody got an MBA
          recently and went to a WEF meeting?</div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
            data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>