<div dir="ltr">Dear all, <div><br></div><div>Hope that you are managing to follow ICANN75 with success and not too much jetlag for those back home. </div><div><br></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">I just wanted to call our SGs attention to the fact that tomorrow, Monday 19th at <span style="color:rgb(68,68,68);white-space:pre-wrap">13:15 MYT (UTC+8), we will have the NCSG <a href="https://75.schedule.icann.org/meetings/pPh4rvj7jLXibQ78g">joint session with the ICANN Board</a>. For tomorrow's meeting we have submitted the questions listed below and I hope to see everyone online !! 

Best,</span></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68);white-space:pre-wrap">Bruna </span></font></div><div><br></div><div>------</div><div><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">NCSG meeting with the ICANN Board </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-left:36pt;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"> </p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">PDPs Effectiveness and Volunteer fatigue </span></p><ol style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">NCSG would like to discuss </span><span style="font-size:11pt;background-color:transparent;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">Board Approval, </span><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">implementation by ICANN org and delays of several PDPs - something we have already discussed with you in previous occasions. If we look at processes such as the EPDP related ones I think we can find a good example due </span></p></li><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">to the fact that even despite the fact that the board didn't yet approve phase 2 recommendation, which were submitted in 2020, there is talk about the design paper of SSAD light. And in the past years, I guess we started gathering more examples of where the development process drags on for far too long and the implementation becomes the place de facto to redo policy recommendations. So NCSG would like to request the board for comments about the current speed or even how do you plan to work together with GNSO and its groups on possible improvements to the PDPs timeline and so on. </span></p></li><span class="gmail-im" style="color:rgb(80,0,80)"><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline"> What efforts are channeled to keep the people in the community from volunteer fatigue?</span></p></li></span></ol><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"> </p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:700;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">Whois Disclosure System</span></p><br><ol style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;background-color:transparent;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">The recently published Whois Disclosure System design paper mentioned a risk that the system might not provide actionable data for use to answer questions raised by the SSAD ODA and this makes us a little concerned about the EPDP recommendations. The direction this work is going seems to point towards the intention to throw away the EPDP recommendations related to SSAD. I'd like to know what the board thinks about this concern.</span></p></li></ol><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"> </p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">ICANN Leadership positions </span></p><span class="gmail-im" style="color:rgb(80,0,80)"><ol style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;background-color:transparent;font-style:italic;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline">What is the Board’s take on the phenomenon of ICANN recycling veterans for leadership positions. Does the Board think it’s beneficial for the community to have the usual suspects rotating between leadership roles of different stakeholder groups?  How do we fix this if we agree this is a problem? How does the Board imagine its role in assisting the community to recruit more new blood?</span></p></li></ol><br></span><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:700;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">NomCom</span></p><ol style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><li dir="ltr" style="margin-left:15px;list-style-type:decimal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;background-color:transparent;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap"><p dir="ltr" role="presentation" style="line-height:1.38;text-align:justify;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;vertical-align:baseline"><i>NCSG has been talking for a long time about the lack of proper representation at the NomCom, the current state of things is that this part of the community only holds one seat at the group - currently held by NCUC - and we trust this configuration is not really representative of the diversity of stakeholders within GNSO or even proportional if we consider that other SGs hold more than just one seat. Therefore we have a very simple question: is there a possibility of rebalancing the NomCom?</i></span></p></li></ol><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b><i>Bruna Martins dos Santos <br></i></b><div dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><br></div><p style="color:rgb(34,34,34);margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size:11px"></span></font></span></p><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt"><font size="2" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font color="#000000">German Chancellor Fellow 21' (</font></span></font><font color="#000000" face="arial, sans-serif">Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin</font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,sans-serif">) | <a href="https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/" target="_blank">Alexander von Humboldt Foundation</a></span></p><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt">Visiting Researcher (Gastwissenschaftlerin) | <a href="https://wzb.eu/en" target="_blank">Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)</a><br></p><p style="color:rgb(34,34,34);margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font color="#000000">Member | <a href="https://direitosnarede.org.br/" target="_blank">Coalizão Direitos na Rede</a> <br>Chair</font></span></font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,sans-serif"> | <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg" target="_blank">Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN</a><br></span><font size="2"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font color="#000000">Co-Coordinator</font></span></font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,sans-serif"> | <a href="https://igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">Internet Governance Caucus </a><br></span><font size="2"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font color="#000000"><br></font></span></font></p><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><font size="1" color="#000000"><font size="2">Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/boomartins" target="_blank"><font color="#1155cc">@</font>boomartins</a> // </font></font></span><span style="color:rgb(32,33,36)">Skype: bruna.martinsantos</span></div></div><div><font color="#0000ee" size="1"><u><a href="mailto:bruna.martinsdossantos@wzb.eu" target="_blank">bruna.martinsdossantos@wzb.eu</a></u></font><font size="1"> and <a href="mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruna.mrtns@gmail.com</a></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>