<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<p>I actually think that since the contracted parties carry the
liability for making a mistake in this distinction, the registrars
should be able to overrule the registrant. This is particularly
important if the jurisdiction where the data is held respects the
rights of employees to protect their personal info, whilst the
person registering the domain name on behalf of the company/org
may be unaware of that situation.</p>
<p>this is a very complex question and I do not support encouraging
small entities to attempt to answer it. It is heaping added legal
costs on the folks we purport to represent.</p>
<p>Stephanie Perrin<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2021-03-24 11:12 a.m., Mueller,
Milton L wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN7PR07MB4689DCF28888630B0A9CA6F5A1639@BN7PR07MB4689.namprd07.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style>@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I was reading through two documents setting
out in detail the proposed guidance on legal/natural.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There seems to be more than one Google doc
on this and I am not sure which one is the latest or most
official, though I suspect it is the one with various people’s
comments crawling all over it.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was pretty supportive of the Guidance
overall. I had one problem with it, though.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I liked the description of HOW the
differentiation needed to take place. But in describing WHEN
differentiation takes place and WHO would do it, it sets out 3
“high level scenarios”.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The first two are ok. The third scenario
(listed as #5 in the document) is that the Registrar does it
for the RNH, based on “inferences.”
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That option just doesn’t fly for those of
us representing RNH’s in this process. We cannot have a
registrant’s disclosure status or person type determined FOR
them by someone else. If we can strike that part of the
guidance, I think we can be on our way to a much broader
consensus. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. Milton L Mueller<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Georgia Institute of Technology<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">School of Public Policy<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="width:2.118in;height:.8472in"
id="Picture_x0020_1"
src="cid:part1.33392C9A.9C834912@digitaldiscretion.ca"
alt="IGP_logo_gold block" class="" width="203" height="81"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>