<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Hi,
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I think, it is the right move. Do not forget the political rational behind the idea about ten years ago, when the proposal, to create another NC group was introduced. One objective of some people, who did not like NCUC, was to split the NC community, to promote internal battles, burocratic hurdles and internal workload to reduce the influence of NC into real policy development. Unfortunately, this "bad strategy" was partly successful. To leave this behind is a right step. United NCSG is stronger. But as said in a previous mail, this will become just one element in a needed restructuring of GNSO and ICANN as a whole. Workstream 3 is waiting and ICANN 4.0 just around the corner.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Wolfgang
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Johan Helsingius <
<a href="mailto:julf@JULF.COM">julf@JULF.COM</a>> hat am 29. Juli 2020 um 08:33 geschrieben:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
On 28-07-2020 20:55, Amr Elsadr wrote:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
That’s right. I see no practical purpose or sense in joining a constituency. I don’t believe the NCUC or NPOC (or any other potential future Constituency) serve any practical purpose to begin with. I say this having been a member of the NCUC in the past.
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
Indeed. As another former NCUC member (and now purely NCSG member) I don't see any point (besides creating more "officer" positions and overhead) in the sub-divisions, and they do split our focus.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Julf
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>