<div dir="ltr">I think Milton is right on this.<div>Regards<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">____<div>REMMY NWEKE, <font size="1">mNGE</font>, </div><div>Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor, <br><span style="background-color:rgb(255,0,0)">DigitalSENSE Africa Media</span> <span>[<i>Multiple-award winning medium</i>]<br></span>(<a href="http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews" target="_blank">DigitalSENSE Business News</a>; <a href="http://www.itrealms.com.ng" target="_blank">ITREALMS</a>, <a href="http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng" target="_blank">NaijaAgroNet</a>)</div><div>Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos<br>M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms" target="_blank">@ITRealms<br></a><div>Author: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E" target="_blank">A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria</a></div><div><br></div><div><b><font color="#ff0000">2020 <a href="http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng" target="_blank">Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D & Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable</a></font></b> </div><div>JOIN us!!</div><div><br></div><div>*Vice President, <a href="http://www.acsis-scasi.org/en/" target="_blank">African Civil Society on the Information Society (ACSIS</a>)</div><div>_________________________________________________________________<br><font size="1">*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.<br></font><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:21 PM james@icann.guru <lists@icann.guru> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div id="gmail-m_-4638147605263021234__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
PTI has more data exposure in its other roles than it does in its naming role, I would not discount those when looking at the strategic plan.<br><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size:8pt"><b>---</b></span><div><span style="font-size:8pt"><b>James Gannon</b></span></div></div><blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-top:20px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px">
<p style="color:rgb(170,170,170);margin-top:10px">On 5/24/2020 5:12:37 PM, Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu" target="_blank">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:</p><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">We have to be careful here.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">It sounds like the PTI statement is saying that by shielding Whois data from indiscriminate public access, privacy laws and regulations are “undermining trust”
in registries and registrars. This is nonsense. Compliance with privacy protections and setting up accountable mechanisms for disclosing protected data actually dramatically increases trust in the system.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Whoever is running PTI should NOT be trying to oppose or undermine specific policy positions developed in the ICANN EPDP. Our comments should call this out.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">If on the other hand they are warning us against jurisdictional fragmentation, it might be a more legitimate concern. In other words, jurisdictional fragmentation
could undermine the ICANN/PTI regime for global DNS governance by making different government have different rules and regulations. We would be very supportive of that but the way it is phrased I think we are talking about the first meaning (bring back the
old Whois) and not the second meaning (maintain global governance of DNS). After all, the problem with jurisdictional fragmentation is not that it undermines trust but that it de-globalizes DNS governance.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">If they are really concerned about jurisdictional fragmentation they should be criticizing efforts by the trademark and IPR interests to engage in geographic
differentiation of our rules governing registration data, and criticizing the US Congress for entertaining legislation proposals that would regulate ICANN in US jurisdiction to enable the old, open Whois.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> NCSG-Discuss <<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 22, 2020 8:15 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Tomslin, <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for jumping in! <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If I understand you correctly, your point is that the risk evoked here is that of conflicting data protection rules? I agree that this is a risk somewhere out there, but I don't quite make the link between a hypothetical "hard" conflict
of laws and the trust of the community in PTI; would you have some language to suggest, either to add or modify what is in the comment already? <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Have a nice day, <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:52 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <<a href="mailto:mesumbeslin@gmail.com" target="_blank">mesumbeslin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for the draft comment Raphael. Much appreciated!<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the comment regarding "evolving data privacy regulation landscape may have impacts on the level of transparency for the IANA registries, which may erode trust and accountability" being a risk to
<i>Maintain stakeholders’ trust that IANA is the proper home for enabling global interoperability through unique identifier coordination,</i> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">you wrote ".....to imply, for example, that data protection policies (including those seemingly developed by the community in the context of the Expedited Policy Development Process) may adversely affect “transparency,” “trust,” or “accountability,”
represents a value judgement. This is problematic because PTI is not the final arbiter when it comes to the implementation of those values into the policies; the community is."<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
In my opinion, I think it is fair for PTI to put that as risk, understanding that risk is a function of probability and impact. What they are saying there in my view is the fact that there is potential for different jurisdictional regulations to affect their
ability to maintain stakeholders' trust.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cheers,<br>
Tomslin<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon., 11 May 2020, 23:58 Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix, <<a href="mailto:rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com" target="_blank">rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have drafted a comment. Comments, suggestions, edits are welcome. The strategic plan itself is quite short so feel free to have a look too! <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let's give it a week here so that the PC also have ample time for review. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Have a nice day,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:34 PM Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">PTI just published a public consultation on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan and asking for input. We commented previously on PTI budget and operating plan and so it is important for us to review this strategic plan. You can find here all
the details here : <a href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-pti-fy21-24-strategic-plan-2020-04-20-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-pti-fy21-24-strategic-plan-2020-04-20-en</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yjqC4fh-X9ISzJQWcxxwE75fHrNmnRuF93lCaweBjck/edit" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yjqC4fh-X9ISzJQWcxxwE75fHrNmnRuF93lCaweBjck/edit</a> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting the NCSG comment, join the drafting team and collaborating with finance committee . <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020" target="_blank"><span style="background:rgb(184,234,184)">https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020</span></a> and
listing those who drafted them or volunteered. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best Regards,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rafik Dammak<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">NCSG Policy Committee Chair <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div>