<div dir="auto"><div>+++1</div><div dir="auto">My opinion is that this issue gives the community the excellent opportunity to explore the powers of the empowered community. A thought I expressed from the outset. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The congress letter signed by 3 Democrats? Personally, I would accept their support yet not get too involved in what may have some unknown political complications, or fallout, call it what you will.</div><div dir="auto"><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">NPC-VIN</div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">Rudi Daniel</div><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 04:49 Wolfgang Kleinwächter <<a href="mailto:wolfgang@kleinwaechter.info">wolfgang@kleinwaechter.info</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div>
1++ to Milton. A slippery slope. Next step would be to ask the UN to intervene. The better way is to follow the NRO approach. We do have an "empowered community".
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
w
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
"Mueller, Milton L" <
<a href="mailto:milton@GATECH.EDU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">milton@GATECH.EDU</a>> hat am 4. Januar 2020 um 02:41 geschrieben:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Kathy,
</div>
<div>
I am not at all comfortable with asking the U.S. Congress to get involved in this.
</div>
<div>
Are you? When Access Now called for Congress to get involved it was clearly due to their lack of experience and knowledge of the IG/ICANN space. We went through the IANA transition to liberate DNS governance from a single jurisdiction. If we call them back in then what do we say when the IPR interests ask for legislation regarding Whois?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
--MM
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
-----Original Message-----
</div>
<div>
From: NCSG-Discuss <
<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>> On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
</div>
<div>
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 8:38 AM
</div>
<div>
To:
<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Subject: Letter from Senators+ on .ORG Sale
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Hi All,
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Happy New Year!! I don't think this has been posted on this list yet. On 12/23, U.S. Senators Ron Wyden, Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal, with Representative Anna Eshoo wrote a letter to PIR, Ethos Capital and ISOC questioning whether nonprofit groups, free speech and internet users would be harmed selling control of .ORG domains to a private equity firm. It's a good letter that shows their staff did some in depth research.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Overview webpage:
</div>
<div>
<a href="https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-blumenthal-warren-and-eshoo-question-sale-of-org-domains-to-private-equity-firm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-blumenthal-warren-and-eshoo-question-sale-of-org-domains-to-private-equity-firm</a>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Letter itself:
</div>
<div>
<a href="https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/122319%20RW%20Letter%20to%20PIR%20ISOC%20Ethos.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/122319%20RW%20Letter%20to%20PIR%20ISOC%20Ethos.pdf</a>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Best,
</div>
<div>
Kathy (Kleiman)
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>