<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Thanks everyone for the support, we co-signed the letter.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:52 PM AMADU YUSIF <<a href="mailto:yamadu@ug.edu.gh">yamadu@ug.edu.gh</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="m_-4576945449597653429divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">I support signing </p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
</p>
<div id="m_-4576945449597653429Signature">
<div name="divtagdefaultwrapper">
Yusif Amadu<br>
eLearning Unit<br>
University of Ghana Computing Systems<br>
University of Ghana<br>
Cell: +233244659245<br>
Skype: kooissi<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="m_-4576945449597653429divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> NCSG-Discuss <<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>> on behalf of Hubert K. Foy (AFRICSIS Dir) <<a href="mailto:hfoy@AFRICSIS.ORG" target="_blank">hfoy@AFRICSIS.ORG</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> 23 October 2018 15:09:12<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="m_-4576945449597653429BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
<div class="m_-4576945449597653429PlainText">I support signing.<br>
<br>
Hubert<br>
<br>
On 2018-10-23 08:34 AM, Razoana Moslam wrote:<br>
> As a NCUC member, I support signing...<br>
> <br>
> Best regards<br>
> Razoana Moslam<br>
> <br>
> On Tue, 23 Oct, 2018 at 10:22 AM, David Cake <<a href="mailto:dave@davecake.net" target="_blank">dave@davecake.net</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> <br>
>> Speaking as EFA rep, I support signing.<br>
>> <br>
>> David<br>
>> <br>
>>> On 22 Oct 2018, at 8:46 pm, farzaneh badii<br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> <br>
>>> We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and<br>
>>> said in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly?<br>
>>> <br>
>>> As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week<br>
>>> adopted<br>
>>> "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of<br>
>>> no<br>
>>> later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after<br>
>>> anyone is<br>
>>> affected by the action complained about).<br>
>>> <br>
>>> I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board<br>
>>> for<br>
>>> approval on Thursday.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not<br>
>>> implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to<br>
>>> challenge it before the deadline expired.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the<br>
>>> adoption<br>
>>> of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public<br>
>>> consultation,<br>
>>> and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision<br>
>>> to<br>
>>> reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has<br>
>>> now put<br>
>>> up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request:<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation!<br>
>>> <br>
>>> While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these<br>
>>> "interim<br>
>>> rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair<br>
>>> refuse to<br>
>>> join a consensus to change them.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even<br>
>>> that it's<br>
>>> scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be<br>
>>> nodded<br>
>>> through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken<br>
>>> to<br>
>>> Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive)<br>
>>> should<br>
>>> Cherine ask them if this should be deferred.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules<br>
>>> are<br>
>>> incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached).<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency?<br>
>>> <br>
>>> P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board<br>
>>> to<br>
>>> drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is<br>
>>> constituency<br>
>>> day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> --<br>
>>> <br>
>>> --<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Farzaneh <Letter to ICANN Board on IRP Interim Rules of Procedure<br>
>>> 2018-10-22 draft 1.docx><br>
> --<br>
> Best Regards,<br>
> Razoana Moslam<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>