<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
Dear Colleagues <br>
First I am Mohamed Farahat from Egypt I am Egyptian lawyer. <br>
I see that for the membership issue for individuals the membership and voting issue not constitute any problem as his/her vot will equal 1 but in context of organization I see that if anyone apply for organization. Membership we could ask for official nomination
from his /her organization to be uploaded with application. For the purpose of voting from the organization we could add question in application such as are you authorized to vote on behalf of your organization if answer is yes we ask the applicant to upload
official authorization from hus/her organization. And this the only one has a right to vote regardless the number of persons from the the ngo. By this we will ensure that each ngo has one voice and one vote and avoiding many votes from the same organization.
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
<div class="quote" style="line-height: 1.5"><br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: Procedures/Individual/organizations membership at NCSG<br>
From: Raoul Plommer <plommer@GMAIL.COM><br>
To: NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<br>
CC: <br>
<br>
<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<span style="font-family:"Lucida Grande";font-size:large">We should try to make this uncomplicated, whilst protecting against undue influence of a particular organization. As to whether privacy law prevents us from asking members who they represent, I am consulting
my legal contacts because I am sure there is a legally compliant way to do this. I do not share Raoul's view that this is "paranoid".</span> </blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Stephanie, we can't really monitor who are members of which organisation, outside the ICANN organisations and we can't store that information because of the GDPR. Being scared of an organisational takeover isn't a valid concern to store this kind of sensitive
data, that's all I meant about being paranoid. I'll be gladly admitting my assumption false if your legal contacts tell you otherwise - I'm no lawyer after all.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Raoul</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 17:43, Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_6216509996373418481WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I disagree, Stephanie.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Indeed, I think it’s completely absurd to have organizations that have 45,000 members with the same voting power as an individual. Many major noncommercial organizations
will simply refuse to join a constituency with that kind of a voting structure. We make a pretty simple and flat voting structure, with large orgs, small orgs and individuals. There are more individuals than organizations, so it works out fairly balanced.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I agree with Sam that voting is relatively unimportant except when it comes to election of officers.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">It takes a lot of trouble and time to organize a vote, so the idea that every administrative decision has to be voted on by the membership is impractical.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">For those unaware of the history, NCUC started as an organization-only constituency, and so did NPOC. Because of the problems many people have getting authorization
to “represent” entire organizations, and in order to allow for broader participation, we allowed individual membership. We adjusted voting shares accordingly.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Dr. Milton L Mueller<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Professor,
<a href="http://spp.gatech.edu/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0563c1">School of Public Policy</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Georgia Institute of Technology<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Internet Governance Project
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><a href="http://internetgovernance.org/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0563c1">http://internetgovernance.org/</span></a>
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> NCSG-Discuss [mailto:<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Stephanie Perrin<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:24 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Procedures/Individual/organizations membership at NCSG<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Lucida Grande",serif">I agree. I think it is entirely problematic to provide more votes for larger organizations. I also share a concern about differentiating between the participation of a member as a rep of
an organization, or as an individual. People should declare their status and that is an end of it. If a member who represents an organization has a strong personal view in a matter that is not supported by their organization, surely they can explain their
viewpoint with a caveat. </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Lucida Grande",serif">We should try to make this uncomplicated, whilst protecting against undue influence of a particular organization. As to whether privacy law prevents us from asking members who they represent,
I am consulting my legal contacts because I am sure there is a legally compliant way to do this. I do not share Raoul's view that this is "paranoid". I think it is essential to have sound principles in place in our policies, to protect the diversity of our
membership, and the essential human rights values of NCSG.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Lucida Grande",serif">Stephanie Perrin</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 2018-09-10 16:14, farzaneh badii wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Farzaneh </span>
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:41 PM Sam Lanfranco <<a href="mailto:lanfran@yorku.ca" target="_blank">lanfran@yorku.ca</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Dear NCSG Colleagues,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">For private reasons I have been less involved in NCSG/NPOC for 2018. I have kept abreast of issues and have long been concerned with those surrounding organizational and individual membership. I would like
to comment here from several slightly different perspectives. </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">First, while we come from the non-commercial constituencies, we address the concerns of the non-commercial constituencies. We do not represent the non-commercial constituency stakeholder group nor are we in
any formal way accountable to it. We simply do our best.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Organizational members may represent the interests and concerns of their organization, then again maybe not. Let me be personal here. When asked to join NPOC and NCSG I had recently served as Chair of the
Board for Canadian global health ngo CSIH. This was early in the ongoing discussions around the Red Cross domain name issue and concerns about health relate gTLDs.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">After a couple of years my NGO effectively untethered me, leaving me to maintain a watching brief and reporting back on issues that may concern them. The rest of the time I could simple engage in addressing
the concerns of the non-commercial constituency. My ngo views its membership as part of its “good works”. I simply do my best and only report back when a relevant issue emerges. I do not speak on behalf of my organizational member.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">It would be interesting to know how many organizational members have a formal obligation to report back to their organization, and how many pre-clear their positions on, and participation in, ICANN policy
matters. When that is not the case, being also an individual member with the associated extra votes raises troubling questions. That is why, although I could, I have not applied for individual membership.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">To cut this short, most of the serious ICANN work is done among us on a consensus basis. What is important is the dialogue, the knowledge sharing, and how hard working members produce useful outputs. Voting
is mainly for selecting among ourselves those willing to put in even more work in essentially administrative leadership positions. Those we elect do not have extraordinary powers, they have extra duties. Voting is not about resolving policy or implementation
issues.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">This leaves me to wonder why we do not simply have one membership, and one vote, per member. Even the large organization small organization distinction makes little sense.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Totally agree Sam. Why we are giving organizations more voting weight than individual members while what they do more or less is the same at NCSG is a mystry to me. Sometimes organizations
have one member or employee! Orgs are not giving bigger dues (we don't charge dues) they are not contributing more than individuals do in any other way. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">We, individually or representing the express positions of our organizations, bring evidence, logic, and context to bear when deliberating policy and implementation issues. Hard fought battles still end in
consensus. They do not end because the vote was 51:49 and “ever vote counts”. What is important is the integrity of the process and the quality of the consensual outputs. The scale and scope of membership and voting rights should reflect this. As they stand
they address things that are really a non-issue here. </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">While I don't expect this to happen in the short run, I would support simplifying participation to one membership and one vote, and returning our energies to producing ICANN deliverables.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Sam L., NPOC</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<pre>-- <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>------------------------------------------------<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>in an unjust state" -Confucius<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre> <span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">邦有道，</span><span style="font-family:"Microsoft JhengHei",sans-serif">贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也</span><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>------------------------------------------------<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Visiting Prof, Xi'an Jaiotong-Liverpool Univ, Suzhou, China<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus), Econ, York U., CANADA<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>email: <a href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca" target="_blank">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a> Skype: slanfranco<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>blog: <a href="https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com" target="_blank">https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852<u></u><u></u></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>