<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear all,</div><div><br></div><div>I've been a silent reader until now because GDPR jurisprudence is still building up, and my daily GDPR compliance work doesn't qualify me to argue with a bunch of lawyers, but this is getting off track, and I feel that it is time to chime in. There is enough knowledge about Data Protection (DP) expressed via Article 29 Working Party (A29WP) over the years to clear issues like this without even having to talk about it.</div><div><br></div><div>The only problem I see here is about culture. USA vs EU cultural gap. To any EU person, Whois has always been borderline illegal, but we didn't have any law like the GDPR yet. Therefore, we had to keep it to ourselves. Meanwhile, Americans made a lot of money by monetising the Right to Privacy offering Whois protection as a domain add-on. It's just as shameful as monetising public water.</div><div><br></div><div>Now we have the GDPR coming into force after two years grace period (I define those "2 years of denial"), and everybody tries to find a loophole in the GDPR to get away with DP violations. Well, let me break this to you guys: there aren't any loopholes, just accept this fact and move on. Google Spain ruling (<a href="http://bit.ly/GoogleSpainRuling">http://bit.ly/GoogleSpainRuling</a>) should have clarified that in the EU we have a different approach to DP. If Google got kicked before the GDPR, do you think that now is the time to look for loopholes? Please... <br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Pino<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 31 May 2018 at 08:23, valentina hvale pellizzer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:valentina@oneworldplatform.net" target="_blank">valentina@oneworldplatform.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Well <br>
    </p>
    <p>I know will sound foolish but why would be staff accountability
      off the table? than what is the sense of all these committee,
      consultations, working groups, big transitions, big policies. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Find it very depressing and exploitive</p>
    <p>hvale<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="m_2390314032224398252moz-cite-prefix">On 05/31/2018 09:13 AM, Ayden Férdeline
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div>It was a very strange legal strategy that ICANN employed. Now
        that it has failed, I wonder what action ICANN org will take
        next -- I presume staff accountability for mishandling the
        issue, and putting forward such questionable advice, is off the
        table, but what's plan D? What will finally give ICANN org the
        "clarity" it so desperately craves? <br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="m_2390314032224398252highlight" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252colour" style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252font" style="font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif"><span class="m_2390314032224398252size" style="font-size:16px">"While<span> </span></span></span></span></span><abbr style="box-sizing:border-box;font-weight:300;unicode-bidi:bidi-override;direction:ltr;border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(153,153,153);text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" title="Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers">ICANN</abbr><span class="m_2390314032224398252highlight" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252colour" style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252font" style="font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif"><span class="m_2390314032224398252size" style="font-size:16px"><span> </span>appreciates
                the prompt attention the Court paid to this matter, the
                Court's ruling today did not provide the clarity that<span> </span></span></span></span></span><abbr style="box-sizing:border-box;font-weight:300;unicode-bidi:bidi-override;direction:ltr;border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(153,153,153);text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" title="Internet
          Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers">ICANN</abbr><span class="m_2390314032224398252highlight" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252colour" style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252font" style="font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif"><span class="m_2390314032224398252size" style="font-size:16px"><span> </span>was
                seeking when it initiated the injunction proceedings,"
                said John Jeffrey,<span> </span></span></span></span></span><abbr style="box-sizing:border-box;font-weight:300;unicode-bidi:bidi-override;direction:ltr;border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(153,153,153);text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" title="Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers">ICANN</abbr><span class="m_2390314032224398252highlight" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252colour" style="color:rgb(51,51,51)"><span class="m_2390314032224398252font" style="font-family:helvetica,arial,sans-serif"><span class="m_2390314032224398252size" style="font-size:16px">'s
                General Counsel and Secretary.</span></span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div class="m_2390314032224398252protonmail_signature_block">
        <div class="m_2390314032224398252protonmail_signature_block-user">
          <div>—Ayden <br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="m_2390314032224398252protonmail_signature_block-proton m_2390314032224398252protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐<br>
      </div>
      <div> On 31 May 2018 6:14 AM, Rafik Dammak
        <a class="m_2390314032224398252moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank"><rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM></a> wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote class="m_2390314032224398252protonmail_quote" type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div>Hi all,<br>
          </div>
          <div>you can find here the update on litigation initiated by
            ICANN <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/<wbr>news/announcement-4-2018-05-<wbr>30-en</a>.
            the court rejected injunction requested by ICANN.<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Best Regards,<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Rafik<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
      </font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    </font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    <pre class="m_2390314032224398252moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
valentina pellizzer
President
One World Platform 

<a class="m_2390314032224398252moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://oneworldplatform.net/" target="_blank">https://oneworldplatform.net/</a>

mobile: +387 (0)61 484 038
twitter: @froatosebe

Fingerprint 30AA 9445 D878 A6C9 FE41 E90D 52A5 36A6 B249 EDA9


</pre>
  </font></span></div>

</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td style="line-height:0;vertical-align:bottom;padding-right:10px;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px" width="107" valign="bottom" align="left">
                <a href="https://about.me/pinodefrancesco?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb" style="text-decoration:none" target="_blank">
                    <img src="https://thumbs.about.me/thumbnail/users/p/i/n/pinodefrancesco_emailsig.jpg?_1511955753_888" alt="" style="margin:0;padding:0;display:block;border:1px solid #eeeeee" width="105" height="70">
                </a>
            </td>
            <td style="line-height:1.1;vertical-align:bottom;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px" valign="bottom" align="left">
                <img src="https://about.me/t/sig?u=pinodefrancesco" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;width:1;height:1;overflow:hidden" width="1" height="1">
                <div style="font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;color:#333333;font-family:'Proxima Nova',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif!important">Giuseppe (Pino) De Francesco</div>
                <a href="https://about.me/pinodefrancesco?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb" style="text-decoration:none;font-size:12px;color:#2b82ad;font-family:'Proxima Nova',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif!important" target="_blank">about.me/pinodefrancesco
                </a>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>