<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Ayden,</p>
    <p>I agree that redlines are crucial. They did post it, but in
      another place.  Here's the redline:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-gtld-registration-data-temp-specs-redline-14may18-en.pdf">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-gtld-registration-data-temp-specs-redline-14may18-en.pdf</a></p>
    <p>All,</p>
    <p>Here's the blog posting:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-update-revised-proposed-temporary-specification-published-webinar-scheduled">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-update-revised-proposed-temporary-specification-published-webinar-scheduled</a></p>
    <p>The webinar is 09:15 to10:30 Pacific Daylight Time (16:15-17:30
      UTC) today to discuss the proposed Temporary Specification.
      Adoption is set for Friday. Participation information at
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-05-14-en">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-05-14-en</a><br>
    </p>
    <p>Best, Kathy<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/15/2018 3:14 AM, Ayden Férdeline
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:GUiJ3sgxIsdwSO2v59dBBGmHMvqvWEkP2GFckb4L1gWaisIYY0la0TkMIwakCha28igX57Ga7KCQjou-n4BRroo5n33v-kKXwmnx6Wji9Vk=@ferdeline.com">
      <div>It is so very disappointing that, embedded within that blog
        post, ICANN has shared a new Proposed Temporary Specification as
        a clean document. It would have been more helpful for ICANN to
        make available a redlined version that showed the differences
        between this 36-page update, and the version shared at the last
        minute last Friday and which the NCSG promptly reviewed. As far
        as I am concerned, this is more evidence of the lack of respect
        ICANN org has for the community it supposedly serves.<br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>—Ayden <br>
      </div>
      <div class="protonmail_signature_block">
        <div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton
          protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐<br>
      </div>
      <div> On 15 May 2018 1:46 AM, Rafik Dammak
        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM"><rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM></a> wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite" class="protonmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div>hi all,<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Please find here the ICANN board chair summary of the
            board workshop which was just held in Vancouver this last
            weekend <a
href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/chair-s-blog-a-wrap-up-of-the-vancouver-board-workshop"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/chair-s-blog-a-wrap-up-of-the-vancouver-board-workshop</a>.<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Best Regards,<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Rafik Dammak<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>NCSG Policy Committee Chair<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>