<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "avri@acm.org" <avri@doria.org> </div><div>Date: 2/19/17 15:04 (GMT+00:00) </div><div>To: Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj@GMAIL.COM>, NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU </div><div>Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Call for volunteers: alternate councillor </div><div><br></div></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>I very much appreciate the support I have gotten. and hope I will be chosen for more council service. </div><div><br></div><div>However, I would like to point out that there are currently 4 candidates as far as I know and the call is still open for several more days. </div><div><br></div><div>As far as process, we sort of do have one, the NCSG EC, once all candidates are in at the end of the week's call. (I think Tapani gave a week) decides what to do. They have the full range of freedom given by the GNSO operating procedures.</div><div><br></div><div>While we could define more detailed processes, I think given the variety of possible exigent circumstances, it is best to leave this open and up to the elected NCSG EC.</div><div><br></div><div>Avri</div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device</div></div></body></html>