<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">While Wolfgang's breakdown is a nice
breakdown for multistakeholder models, the bigger question lurking
in the background is:<br>
<br>
"<i>Is there Internet Governance outside the multistakeholder
model?</i>"<br>
<br>
Looking at the Internet from an economist's perspective, it is a
terrain of increasingly differentiated products and processes. One
would expect vested interests and special interest groups to split
off the parts of Internet governance of key interest to them and
address those interests in what they view as the most favorable
policy venues. The history of the past 70 years suggests that
special interests with power (a.k.a. governments and big business)
press their interests in multinational venues, and increasingly in
multilateral trade agreements that have little in common with the
trade agreements of 50 years ago. Those venues focus on policy
issues like intellectual property and such...with Internet
governance a rising item on those agendas. One might expect
ICANN's remit to be more clearly, and tightly, defined as this
process unfolds, but as it unfolds all of us will have to be
active as stakeholders in a wider array of Internet governance
activities if an open and free Internet is to be sustained. <br>
<br>
Sam L. <br>
<br>
On 9/22/2016 1:02 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2DA93620FC07494C926D60C8E3C2F1A801D3AED1@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Avri:
"..there is no multistakeholder model without governments,...."
Wolfgang:
I see four models
1. ICANN model (with governments in an advisory capacity)
2. WSIS model (with non-governmental stakeholders in a consultation process)
3. IGF model (all stakeholders on equal footing with no decision making capacity)
4. NetMundial model (all stakeholders on equal footing with limited decision making capacity)
RIRs and IETF are special cases, open to everybody but too Special.
Interesting experiences emerge in some countries at the national Level.
Lets wait and see what Fadis "many little ICANNs" will produce.
We are still in an early phase. There is no "BEST practice", but there is a growing number of "good practices".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a> Skype: slanfranco
blog: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852</pre>
</body>
</html>