<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/xhtml; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="font-family:sans-serif"><div style="white-space:pre-wrap"><div dir="auto">Milton,
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto">I need to better understand your comment in terms of the CCT-Review
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto"><question on PICs>
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto">where not PICs a voluntary offer by applicants???
</div><div dir="auto">why do you say PICs (as opposed to Safeguards) were imposed by GAC / ALAC?
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto">need some background please
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto">
</div><div dir="auto">Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
</div><div dir="auto">+506 8837 7176
</div><div dir="auto">Skype: carlos.raulg
</div><div dir="auto">Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
</div><div dir="auto">On 20 Sep 2016, at 8:29, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
</div><div dir="auto">
</div></div>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #777; color:#777; margin:0 0 5px; padding-left:5px"><div id="440DB528-4BEF-4E3F-AA24-6545A9BCE7A1">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Thanks, Vidushi.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I added a new paragraph about PICs (public interest commitments) to the HR section.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333;background:white">PICS. We oppose allowing the GAC or ALAC to hold applicants hostage in order to extract so-called “Public Interest Commitments” from new registries.
PICs actually constitute a form of policy making that bypasses the GNSO and the entire bottom up process. By imposing content regulations on registries, they also can clash with ICANN’s new mission statement, which is supposed to prevent it from regulating
content<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333;background:white"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> vidushi@cis-india.org [mailto:vidushi@cis-india.org]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:44 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu><br>
<b>Cc:</b> NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD subsequent procedure WG<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dear Milton,
<br>
<br>
Thanks for your comments. I have taken off the FCFS section and made it a comment for anyone who disagrees with this change.
<br>
<br>
Some other comments that require a rewrite I have not resolved - I would ask you to edit the document directly as that would be most accurate.
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <br>
<br>
Vidushi<br>
<br>
----- On Sep 19, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper">
<p style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">I hope this is not the final version, it contain some sections that don't make sense and need to be modified.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">I have added some comments in the Google doc. In particular, I think we need to delete altogether what is now section c), and probably also section d).
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Neither of them make coherent points and they espouse positions which do not have consensus support i n NCSG
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">
<hr size="2" width="98%" align="center">
</span></div>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> NCSG-Discuss <<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>>
on behalf of Vidushi Marda <<a href="mailto:vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG">vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, September 19, 2016 3:32:06 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD subsequent procedure WG</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black;background:white">Dear All, </span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
<br>
<span style="background:white">Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG:
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#</a>. All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee can pick this up now.
</span><br>
<br>
<span style="background:white">Best wishes, </span><br>
<br>
<span style="background:white">Vidushi </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" id="zwchr">
</span></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><a href="mailto:vidushi@cis-india.org">vidushi@cis-india.org</a><br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG">vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG</a><br>
<b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Monday, September 19, 2016 11:06:35 AM<br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD subsequent procedure WG<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dear All, <br>
<br>
Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG:
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#</a>. All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee can pick this up now.
<br>
<br>
Best wishes, <br>
<br>
Vidushi <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Vidushi Marda <<a href="mailto:vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG">vidushi@CIS-INDIA.ORG</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dear All,
<br>
<br>
I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion Farzi.
<br>
<br>
Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th? That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating them.<br>
<br>
Best, <br>
<br>
Vidushi<br>
<br>
----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <<a href="mailto:mike.oghia@GMAIL.COM">mike.oghia@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">+1 Farzi
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">-Michael</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Thank you Vidushi and Niels, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the comments first. I suggest
set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in the past and worked out well.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Best<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Farzaneh <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina <<a href="mailto:tatiana.tropina@gmail.com" target="_blank">tatiana.tropina@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Hi Niels and all,
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it is.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#888888">Tatiana <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever <<a href="mailto:lists@digitaldissidents.org" target="_blank">lists@digitaldissidents.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Dear all,<br>
<br>
This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,<br>
perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Niels<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:<br>
> Dear All,<br>
><br>
> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this link:
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
><br>
> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over arching human rights concerns.<br>
><br>
> I look forward to your feedback and comments.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> Vidushi<br>
><br>
> ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman <a href="mailto:kathy@KATHYKLEIMAN.COM" target="_blank">
kathy@KATHYKLEIMAN.COM</a> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi Niels,<br>
>><br>
>> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did<br>
>> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working<br>
>> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind<br>
>> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG<br>
>> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --<br>
>> even a little late!<br>
>><br>
>> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer<br>
>> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for<br>
>> comment would enable more people to participate.<br>
>><br>
>> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,<br>
>><br>
>> Kathy<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:<br>
>>> Dear all,<br>
>>><br>
>>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive<br>
>>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the<br>
>>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority<br>
>>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from<br>
>>> the global south, etc).<br>
>>><br>
>>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is<br>
>>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be<br>
>>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the<br>
>>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0].<br>
>>><br>
>>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on<br>
>>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to<br>
>>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so<br>
>>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)<br>
>>><br>
>>> All the best,<br>
>>><br>
>>> Niels<br>
>>><br>
>>> [0]<br>
>>> <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2" target="_blank">
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#888888">--<br>
Niels ten Oever<br>
Head of Digital<br>
<br>
Article 19<br>
<a href="http://www.article19.org" target="_blank">www.article19.org</a><br>
<br>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4<br>
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#888888"><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#888888">Farzaneh
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote>
<div style="white-space:pre-wrap"><div dir="auto">
</div></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>