<div dir="ltr">ICANN staff seems to be inclined towards a smaller group that could work efficiently within the limited time frame ahead (about a month). This motion will be further discussed today afternoon and will be decided upon on Thursday. <div>Marilia</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Stephanie Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca" target="_blank">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Totally agree, Marilia!</font></font></p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie</font></font><br>
</p></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<div>On 2016-06-26 7:52, Marilia Maciel
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">My concern is with the balance of SGs inputs into
the discussion. This a complex issue in which some decisions
will be made. I tend to think that an equal number of
participants would be important to achieve a fair result.
Otherwise we may confront ourselves with a army of legal people
dedicated full time to this. What do others think about a group
with limited membership and parity of members?
<div>Marilia</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:53 PM,
Matthew Shears <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>+ 1 Yes, open. The CCWG bylaws work has been a useful
training ground. <br>
</p>
<div>
<div> <br>
<div>On 6/24/2016 9:41 AM, James Gannon wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div>Yes I’d support this, plenty of us who have
been working on CWG and CCWG can move quickly
on this working with councillors in a bottom
up manner.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-J</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span>
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:12pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt"> <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>NCSG-Discuss
<<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>>
on behalf of farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span>farzaneh
badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@GMAIL.COM</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Friday
24 June 2016 at 07:24<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>"
<<a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
Council Item for Disussion<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">or perhaps call for an open
group so that anyone can join?
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 24 June 2016 at
08:01, Dorothy K. Gordon <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:director-general@aiti-kace.com.gh" target="_blank">director-general@aiti-kace.com.gh</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> In theory
your approach would be ideal but given
the deadlines would it be effectively
possible? Perhaps Council + a few
others?<br>
<span><br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "James Gannon" <<a href="mailto:james@CYBERINVASION.NET" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:james@CYBERINVASION.NET" target="_blank">james@CYBERINVASION.NET</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:30 AM<br>
Subject: Council Item for Disussion<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi All,<br>
As we know there are many changes
coming for the role of the GNSO with
our new accountability powers, I want
to call out the following item on the
council agenda for Helsinki<br>
<br>
</span> * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE -
Approval to Form a Drafting Team to
Develop an Implementation Plan for New
and Additional GNSO Powers and
Obligations under the Revised ICANN
Bylaws (15 minutes)<br>
<div>
<div><br>
I have to say that I am concerned
about this, this is a critical item
for the GNSO and will set its
strategic view and position for the
next 5-7 years most likely, I don’t
fee very comfortable with this being
done in a potentially top down
manner by council, I feel that this
should be developed in a bottom up
manner by the SGs and C’s first.<br>
<br>
<br>
I would be interested in others
thoughts so that we can guide the PC
on a position on this<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
James<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Farzaneh
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span> </blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<pre cols="72">--
Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy & Technology | <a href="http://cdt.org" target="_blank">cdt.org</a>
E: <a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a> | T: <a href="tel:%2B44.771.247.2987" value="+447712472987" target="_blank">+44.771.247.2987</a>
</pre>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>