<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><div class="gmail_default"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">+1 <br><br></span></font></div><font size="2"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Does
 it however make sense to use part of the explanation given by Alissa 
Cooper to outline why it is problematic to reference thus far unwritten 
documents? Perhaps after this sentence:<br><br></span></font><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt" id="docs-internal-guid-83b31970-c906-77ea-d8af-4d97db22ab52"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline">"These
 were not part of the accepted proposal, and by referencing 
as-yet-unwritten documents and exempting them from challenges they 
create unacceptable risks" [because/such as etc.] <br></span></span></font></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline"></span></span></font></p><p style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline"><font size="2">Or is that unnecessary?</font></span></span></p><p style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><br></p><p style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt">best,<br></p><p style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline"></span></span></p><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline"></span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Mueller, Milton L <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu" target="_blank">milton@gatech.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Niels and Tatiana have added comments about the HR Section of the bylaws. Here is what we plan to turn in by May 20:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-PHQh9yJztarUO6qF8J6Ebv6s/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-PHQh9yJztarUO6qF8J6Ebv6s/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> > Dear colleagues<br>
> ><br>
> > Here are some proposed comments on the draft bylaws.<br>
> > Most of them echo comments already made by the CCWG and the ICG, but I<br>
> > think it worthwhile for NCSG to weigh in.<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-</a><br>
> PHQh9yJztarUO6q<br>
> > F8J6Ebv6s/edit?usp=sharing<br>
> ><br>
> > Dr. Milton L. Mueller<br>
> > Professor, School of Public Policy<br>
> > Georgia Institute of Technology<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Corinne J.N. Cath </span><br></div></div>
</div></div>