<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office">
<head>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<!--[if gte mso 9]>
<xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
<o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml>
<![endif]-->
<style type="text/css">* a:hover{cursor:pointer;}</style>
<style>body {-webkit-animation:bugfix infinite 1s;}@-webkit-keyframes bugfix {from {position:relative;}to {position:relative;}}</style>
</head>
<body style="word-wrap:normal; word-break:break-word;">
<style>a {word-wrap:normal;word-break:break-word;}.background-contain {background-size:contain;}@media only screen and (max-width:600px) {.container {-webkit-text-size-adjust:none !important;}.container,.palm-one-whole {width:100% !important;min-width:100% !important;}.palm-one-half {width:50% !important;min-width:50% !important;box-sizing:border-box;}blockquote .container,blockquote .container div,blockquote .container table {width:auto !important;min-width:0 !important;position:relative !important;}img {max-width:100%;}.border-outer,.border-middle,.border-inner,.inner,[title="separator"] {width:100% !important;}.innercell {padding:8px !important;}.palm-block {display:block !important;}td.palm-one-whole {display:inline-block !important;padding:0;}td.palm-one-whole:first-child:not(:only-child) {margin-bottom:16px;}td.hostname {padding-top:3px !important;}}@media only screen and (min-width:601px) {.preview-card {max-width:600px !important;}}@media only screen and (min-device-width :320px) and (max-device-width :568px),only screen and (min-device-width :768px) and (max-device-width :1024px),only screen and (max-device-width:640px),only screen and (max-device-width:667px),only screen and (max-width:480px){.container {width:100% !important;min-width:100% !important;}.p,.small,li,font[size="2"],font[size="3"] {font-size:17px !important;line-height:1.5 !important;}}@media only screen and (min-device-width :320px) and (max-device-width :568px),only screen and (min-device-width :768px) and (max-device-width :1024px),only screen and (min-device-width :1224px) {.message-wrapper {padding-top:6px;}.apple-only[style] {display:block !important;max-height:none !important;line-height:normal !important;overflow:visible !important;height:auto !important;width:100% !important;position:relative !important;}.no-apple {display:none !important;}form {font-size:inherit;}input[type="text"] {height:43px;padding-left:4px !important;}button:hover {cursor:pointer;}}@media only screen and (min-device-width :1224px) {.apple-mail-form {display:block !important;background-color:white !important;}}* [office365] .outlook-com-hidden {display:none !important;}* [office365] .outlook-com-button {display:block;}* [office365] .outlook-com-only {display:block !important;max-height:none !important;line-height:normal !important;overflow:visible !important;height:auto !important;width:100% !important;position:relative !important;}</style>
<!--[if (gte mso 9)|(IE)]>
<style>a,body {font-family:'Calibri',Arial,sans-serif;}img {border:none !important;-ms-interpolation-mode:bicubic;}td {mso-line-height-rule:exactly !important;}.mso-card-inner table {border-collapse:collapse !important;mso-table-lspace:0pt;mso-table-rspace:0pt;vertical-align:top;}.outlook-com-only {display:none !important;font-size:0 !important;}#mso-one-whole {width:100% !important;}.border-outer,.border-middle,.border-inner {border:none !important;}.border-middle,.border-inner {width:100% !important;}.mso-border-outer,.mso-border-middle,.mso-border-inner {padding:1px;}.mso-border-outer {background-color:rgb(245,255,255);}.mso-border-middle {background-color:rgb(223,246,255);}.mso-border-inner {background-color:rgb(153,176,225);}</style>
<![endif]-->
<table class="container" lang="container" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" valign="top" style="width:100%; margin-top:6px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top" class="message-wrapper" style="line-height: 1.31; color: #222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<!--[if mso]><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" valign="top" style="border-collapse:separate;"><tr><td valign="top"><![endif]-->
<div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">Hello, all-</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">Thank you to all who have commented in this thread. I have been trying to get up to speed on this topic today and have found your comments to be an extremely useful primer — and a special thank you to Amr for clarifying that we actually have two different topics out for public comment (though the distinction between the two still isn't entirely clear to me, nor is the distinction between the acronyms 'RDDS' and 'RDS' which seem to be used in similar contexts by different stakeholders).</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">From what I have heard about the history of WHOIS/RDS/RDDS systems, the community has invested significant resources over the past two decades only to achieve minimal change. We now have the Next-Generation Registration Directory Service PDP working group where we have the capacity to make real, meaningful recommendations. Why, then, would we respond to either of these consultations which could prejudice the working group's capacity to comprehensively reform how and when domain name registration data is collected and shared? (I feel like this question has been asked by someone else but I cannot remember who — apologies for the lack of attribution.)</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">If we were to comment — and I know that Marília has said we are not in a position to do so today because we do not quite have consensus, and I would like to echo that stance because I don't think we should be responding out of principle to either of these consultations — I'd like to add on to what Sana said by suggesting that we lay out our stance on minimisation in two respects: firstly, on data, and secondly, on the use of community resources ;-) . </font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">To the former this has been hammered home by quite a few respondents, and I particularly liked how Antoin Verschuren (a registrar) in his submission implied if the registrar registration expiration date was to be stored in the open registration directory service, what could be next - the registrant's credit card expiry date? There has to be a limit somewhere and a move to make data in the registrar-registrant contract, public, is not the path I would want us to be going down. The less data collected the better, in my view. </font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">To the second point on community resources, if we have two topics so similar out for public comment (and from reading the submitted comments, it seems quite a few respondents are treating them as one and the same), perhaps they could have been amalgamated in the first place? And why are we even discussing these issues when we have over 100 community members actively participating in the Next-Generation RDS PDP working group? I hope we are not living a <a href="https://links2.mixmaxusercontent.com/aMjjKHWxnLSD3SEwj/l/ZXc5S4hTOO54Bm3LY?rn=gIVRURuIVWT5iVSV0UUNVSMB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI&re=gI1RWZuIXez5idyV2c0NXasB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI">skit from Yes Minister</a> where a WG has been formed merely to go through the 'charade of discussions'…</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">I hope I am not contributing to any confusion here with my comments. I just wanted to put it on the record within our mailing list at least that I don't think we need to be responding to either of these consultations given the activities being explored by the Next-Generation RDS PDP working group.</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">Best wishes,</font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" style="font-size: 13px;">Ayden Férdeline</font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Sana Ali <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sana.ali2030@gmail.com" target="_blank">sana.ali2030@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Count my endorsement in for this. Perhaps we can include what our general stance is (minimization)? <div>Thanks, Marilia.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;word-wrap:break-word"><div>Sana </div></div><br><br>
</div></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Mar 18, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Marilia Maciel <<a href="mailto:mariliamaciel@GMAIL.COM" target="_blank">mariliamaciel@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Dear all, following the support on the list, I have put together the following short and sweet text and have called for consensus on it. Any suggestions?</font><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Comments from the Non-commercial Stakeholder
Group (NCSG) on the public comment period related to the “Registration Data
Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and
Registrars”</font></p><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font><br></div><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Thank you for the opportunity to provide public
comment on the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for
gTLD Registries and Registrars.</font></p><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font><br></div><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">NCSG would like to give support to the points
that have been raised by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) in their
contribution to this consultation, which can be found at: <a href="https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html" target="_blank">https://forum.icann.org/lists/<wbr>comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/<wbr>msg00001.html</a></font></p><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font><br></div><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Particularly, the NCSG would like to stress the
importance of specifying the RDAP Profile in a way that leaves<font color="#1a1a1a"> the broadest range of options to the PDP on next-generation
gTLD registration directory services from a policy perspective.</font></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#1a1a1a"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#1a1a1a">Best wishes,</font></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#1a1a1a"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Marília </font><font face="Calibri" style="font-size:large"></font></font></p>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Shears <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Good thought Desiree. Others?<div><div><br><br>On Friday, 18 March 2016, Desiree Miloshevic <<a href="mailto:dmiloshevic@afilias.info" target="_blank">dmiloshevic@afilias.info</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.<br>
While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I do find that<br>
google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g. not to offer public access to the data.<br>
<br>
>>> <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf" target="_blank">http://forum.icann.org/lists/<wbr>comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/<wbr>pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf</a><br>
<br>
The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and let registries/registrars<br>
deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the rest.<br>
<br>
So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing (differentiated) access to the data immediately?<br>
Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...<br>
<br>
Desiree<br>
--<br>
<br>
On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <<a>aelsadr@EGYPTIG.ORG</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I think it’s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
> Amr<br>
><br>
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <<a>mariliamaciel@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is today, 23:59 UTC.<br>
>> Best wishes<br>
>> M<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <<a>wendy@seltzer.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I support endorsing the IAB comment.<br>
>><br>
>> --Wendy<br>
>><br>
>> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:<br>
>>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the<br>
>>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would<br>
>>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could<br>
>>> share their views on the next hours.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks!<br>
>>> Marília<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <<a>shane@time-travellers.org</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> All,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100<br>
>>>> Shane Kerr <<a>shane@time-travellers.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the<br>
>>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that<br>
>>>>> matter to us.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Cheers,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> Shane<br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list<br>
>>> <a>PC-NCSG@ipjustice.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg" target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/<wbr>listinfo/pc-ncsg</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Wendy Seltzer -- <a>wendy@seltzer.org</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Marília Maciel<br>
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio<br>
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School<br>
>> <a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a><br>
>> DiploFoundation associate - <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a><br>
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - <a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">http://www.politics.org.br/</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="font-size: 13px;">Marília Maciel</font></b></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444" style="font-size: 13px;">Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio</font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444" style="font-size: 13px;">Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School</font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444" style="font-size: 13px;"><a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a></font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444" style="font-size: 13px;">DiploFoundation associate - <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a></font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444" style="font-size: 13px;">PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - <span style="line-height:14px"><a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">http://www.politics.org.br/</a></span><br></font></div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="mixmax_signature"><div>Ayden Férdeline</div><div><a href="https://links1.mixmaxusercontent.com/aMjjKHWxnLSD3SEwj/l/TUxALZrpRRQW6YhDs?rn=gIVRURuIVWT5iVSV0UUNVSMB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI&re=gI1RWZuIXez5idyV2c0NXasB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI" style="background-color: white;">Statement of Interest</a></div></div><img width="0" height="0" style="border:0; width:0px; height:0px;" src="https://app.mixmax.com/api/track/v2/moOrLGuxm6pDEuMGf/i02bj5SZulGblRmclZGQu5WYjlmI/gI1RWZuIXez5idyV2c0NXasB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI/gIVRURuIVWT5iVSV0UUNVSMB0UTV1QTlERtc0UD5kI?sc=false" alt="">
<!--[if mso]></td></tr></table><![endif]-->
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>