<div dir="ltr"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Dear all, following the support on the list, I have put together the following short and sweet text and have called for consensus on it. Any suggestions?</font><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Comments from the Non-commercial Stakeholder
Group (NCSG) on the public comment period related to the "Registration Data
Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and
Registrars"</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Thank you for the opportunity to provide public
comment on the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for
gTLD Registries and Registrars.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">NCSG would like to give support to the points
that have been raised by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) in their
contribution to this consultation, which can be found at: <a href="https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html">https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html</a></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Particularly, the NCSG would like to stress the
importance of specifying the RDAP Profile in a way that leaves<span style="color:rgb(26,26,26)"> the broadest range of options to the PDP on next-generation
gTLD registration directory services from a policy perspective.</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(26,26,26)"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#1a1a1a">Best </font><font color="#1a1a1a">wishes</font><font color="#1a1a1a">,</font></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#1a1a1a"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Marília </font><font face="Calibri" style="font-size:large"></font></font></p>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Shears <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Good thought Desiree. Others?<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br><br>On Friday, 18 March 2016, Desiree Miloshevic <<a href="mailto:dmiloshevic@afilias.info" target="_blank">dmiloshevic@afilias.info</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.<br>
While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I do find that<br>
google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g. not to offer public access to the data.<br>
<br>
>>> <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf" target="_blank">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf</a><br>
<br>
The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and let registries/registrars<br>
deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the rest.<br>
<br>
So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing (differentiated) access to the data immediately?<br>
Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...<br>
<br>
Desiree<br>
--<br>
<br>
On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <<a>aelsadr@EGYPTIG.ORG</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I think it’s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
> Amr<br>
><br>
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <<a>mariliamaciel@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is today, 23:59 UTC.<br>
>> Best wishes<br>
>> M<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <<a>wendy@seltzer.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I support endorsing the IAB comment.<br>
>><br>
>> --Wendy<br>
>><br>
>> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:<br>
>>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the<br>
>>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would<br>
>>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could<br>
>>> share their views on the next hours.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks!<br>
>>> Marília<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <<a>shane@time-travellers.org</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> All,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100<br>
>>>> Shane Kerr <<a>shane@time-travellers.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the<br>
>>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that<br>
>>>>> matter to us.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Cheers,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> Shane<br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list<br>
>>> <a>PC-NCSG@ipjustice.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg" target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Wendy Seltzer -- <a>wendy@seltzer.org</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Marília Maciel<br>
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio<br>
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School<br>
>> <a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a><br>
>> DiploFoundation associate - <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a><br>
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - <a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">http://www.politics.org.br/</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Marília Maciel</font></b></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444">Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio</font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444">Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School</font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444"><a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a></font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444">DiploFoundation associate - <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a></font></div><div><font size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#444444">PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - <span style="line-height:14px"><a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">http://www.politics.org.br/</a></span><br></font></div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>