<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    We were thinking of having a webinar to talk about what has happened
    historically, just so that those who are relatively new can be aware
    of some hazards.  We will only do this if there is sufficient
    interest.  We recognize that there is a diversity of views in NCSG,
    but generally we have consensus around protecting free speech, and
    privacy for not just individuals, but groups and small business. 
    There is also rough consensus about keeping ICANN focused on
    avoiding getting into content regulation....whereas the Public
    Safety Group has expressed a view that there is no easier forum to
    get the information they need than ICANN (I am summarizing rather
    roughly there, but you get the tension). <br>
    The issue with sub groups is having enough representation on each,
    in the EWG those who wanted a particular feature volunteered to
    draft a section of the report, and I was physically incapable of
    following all the sub groups.  Obviously this pdp is quite
    different, but the risk remains the same. <br>
    Kind regards<br>
    Stephanie Perrin<br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-01-18 10:57, Sana Ali wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:EA5ED145-CB55-4256-AD6C-3D6DDBE49C05@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      Hello Stephanie and team,
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">I see that for the sake of practicality and
        thoroughness there may be need to divide it up, but I think as
        long as we establish a vetting system whereby those involved in
        different divisions still have the opportunity of appraising
        developments made elsewhere along the way, we can avert the
        danger of losing representativeness. Would that be the main
        cause of worry? Should we expect this process to look
        substantially different from other PDPs that are taking place at
        ICANN? I would also love to hear from some of the seasoned
        members of the community.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
        <div class="">
          <div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
            -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
            <div class="">Sana Ali</div>
            <div class=""><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:sana.ali2030@gmail.com" class="">sana.ali2030@gmail.com</a></div>
            <div class=""><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="https://ca.linkedin.com/in/sanaali2030" class="">https://ca.linkedin.com/in/sanaali2030</a></div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
        <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal;
          orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
          text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto;
          word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap:
          break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break:
          after-white-space;" class="">
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
        </div>
        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
      </div>
      <br class="">
      <div>
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">
          <div class="">On Jan 18, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Stephanie Perrin
            <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@MAIL.UTORONTO.CA" class="">stephanie.perrin@MAIL.UTORONTO.CA</a>>
            wrote:</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <div class="">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class=""> Great news,
              we are assembling quite a team.  Take a look at how many
              public safety folks from the GAC have signed up....we need
              a big team!<br class="">
              We will be organizing a list for just NCSG folks, and a
              skype channel to use during meetings, to keep us
              coordinated.  This is going to be a very big pdp, I expect
              to see calls to divide it up...do folks have thoughts on
              that?  I view it as dangerous.<br class="">
              Kind regards Stephanie<br class="">
              <br class="">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16-01-18 2:54 AM, Joy
                Liddicoat wrote:<br class="">
              </div>
              <blockquote
                cite="mid:010001d151c5$84488f50$8cd9adf0$@liddicoatlaw.co.nz"
                type="cite" class="">
                <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
                  charset=UTF-8" class="">
                <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14
                  (filtered medium)" class="">
                <div class="WordSection1">
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Thanks Stephanie –
                      I have also joined as an individual.</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Regards</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Joy Liddicoat</span></p>
                  <div class=""><span class=""> </span><br
                      class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><b class=""><span class=""
                        lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span class=""
                      lang="EN-US"> NCSG-Discuss [<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                        href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a></a>]
                      <b class="">On Behalf Of </b>Poomjit
                      Sirawongprasert<br class="">
                      <b class="">Sent:</b> Friday, 15 January 2016 2:04
                      a.m.<br class="">
                      <b class="">To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                        href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br
                        class="">
                      <b class="">Subject:</b> Re: Privacy and WHOIS
                      update</span></p>
                  <div class=""> <br class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                  </div>
                  <p class="">Hi Stephanie,</p>
                  <p class="">Could you please add me into the observer
                    list?</p>
                  <p class="">Thanks, </p>
                  <p class="">Moui</p>
                  <p class="">Sent via Mobile</p>
                  <div class="">
                    <p class="MsoNormal">On Jan 10, 2016 4:38 AM,
                      "Stephanie Perrin" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca"
                        class="">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>>

                      wrote:</p>
                    <div class="">
                      <p class="MsoNormal">This is just a quick note to
                        update list members on what is going on at ICANN
                        related to privacy and protection of
                        registration data.  The most important
                        development which I need to bring to your
                        attention is the call for volunteers for the new
                        pdp to develop a replacement for the WHOIS
                        directory.  I have copied the call at the bottom
                        of this email.  Please consider joining, either
                        as an observer or full participant.  If you have
                        questions, please do not hesitate to contact me,
                        Tapani Tarvainen, or Kathy Kleiman (in cc).  We
                        really need a great many people to volunteer for
                        this work, as it is extremely important, and
                        there are many commercial participants already
                        signed up.  It is important to have balanced
                        representation of interests on these working
                        groups.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        Registrars and technical experts have expressed
                        concern, notably at the GNSO level, about the
                        RDAP (registration data access protocol) work
                        that is proceeding even though the work of the
                        PDP on WHOIS replacement may make this work
                        irrelevant.  It is likely a call to put the
                        brakes on that work may develop.  For more
                        information on the RDAP implementation, look
                        here:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en"
                          target="_blank" class="">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en</a>. 

                        We will be putting in comments, due in 22 days.<br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                        The call for volunteers for the Competition and
                        Consumer Trust Review Team has resulted in the
                        selection of the team, listed here:  <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-12-23-en"
                          target="_blank" class=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-12-23-en">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-12-23-en</a></a>. 

                        This is a very important review, and members may
                        be interested in following the work of this
                        team.  Further information is available here <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/cct"
                          target="_blank" class=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/cct">http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/cct</a></a>
                        and members may be interested in looking at the
                        public opinion survey done by Nielsen in 2015,
                        as it will no doubt be important for the work of
                        the committee, and be considered in the context
                        of the the two studies of DNS abuse for which
                        ICANN is currently tendering.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        The Final report and recommendations of the
                        Privacy Proxy Working Group has been sent to the
                        GNSO for its endorsement, and will be discussed
                        at the Marrakech meeting in March.  We expect to
                        see a call for volunteers for the implementation
                        working group shortly. <br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        Finally, we are proposing to have a privacy
                        meeting in Marrakech, although we have yet to
                        hear whether this proposal has been approved. 
                        Stay tuned, and please join us for the next
                        monthly discussion on January 19th.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        Stephanie Perrin</p>
                      <div class="">  <br
                          class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcements"
                          target="_blank" class="">https://www.icann.org/news/announcements</a></p>
                      <h1 class="">Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy
                        Development Process (PDP) Working Group to
                        Establish a Policy Framework for a
                        Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory
                        Service to Replace WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS)</h1>
                      <h3 class="">How to Join</h3>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">If you are interested in
                        joining the WG as an individual participant or
                        mailing list observer, please fill in the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://goo.gl/forms/bb65iIznLv"
                          target="_blank" class="">sign up form</a> or
                        send the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gnso-pdp-next-gen-rds-wg-sign-up-04jan16-en.docx"
                          target="_blank" class="">Word document</a>
                        [DOCX, 72 KB] filled in to the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org"
                          target="_blank" class="">GNSO Secretariat</a></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">All members and observers
                        will be listed on the PDP WG's wiki page. </p>
                      <h3 class="">In Brief</h3>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">The Generic Names Supporting
                        Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers to
                        serve on a PDP Working Group to establish a
                        policy framework for a next-generation gTLD
                        Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace
                        WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS). The GNSO Council <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201511"
                          target="_blank" class="">approved the WG's
                          charter</a> on 19 November 2015, tasking this
                        PDP to address concerns with WHOIS by creating a
                        new policy framework capable of balancing
                        diverse interests to meet today's needs for gTLD
                        registration data.</p>
                      <div class=""> <br
                          class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><b class="">What This Team
                          Will Do</b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        The PDP WG will use a 3-phase process defined in
                        the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">approved charter</a>to
                        (1) establish gTLD registration data
                        requirements to determine if and why a
                        next-generation RDS is needed, (2) design
                        policies that detail functions that must be
                        provided by a next-generation RDS to support
                        those requirements, and (3) provide guidance for
                        how a next-generation RDS should implement those
                        policies, coexisting with and eventually
                        replacing WHOIS. </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">This PDP WG will provide the
                        GNSO Council with policy recommendations
                        regarding the issues identified in the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">Final Issue Report</a>
                        [PDF, 1.4 MB] and as defined in the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">charter approved by
                          the GNSO Council</a> [PDF, 628 KB].
                        Specifically, this PDP WG is tasked with
                        analyzing the purpose of collecting, maintaining
                        and providing access to gTLD registration data
                        and considering safeguards for protecting that
                        data, determining if and why a next-generation
                        RDS is needed to replace WHOIS, and creating
                        policies and coexistence and implementation
                        guidance to meet those needs.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">During the first phase of
                        this PDP, the PDP WG will, at a minimum, attempt
                        to reach consensus recommendations regarding the
                        questions detailed in the PDP WG’s charter.
                        The PDP WG’s output will then be submitted to
                        the GNSO Council for approval of its
                        recommendations regarding IF and WHY a
                        next-generation RDS is needed to replace WHOIS
                        before moving to the next phase. If the WG
                        concludes a new policy framework is needed, this
                        output should include requirements to be
                        addressed by that new framework and any
                        next-generation RDS. However, if the WG
                        concludes the existing WHOIS system can
                        adequately address requirements, the WG’s
                        output should confirm this and identify any
                        necessary changes to the WHOIS policy framework.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">After Phase 1, if the GNSO
                        Council confirms that a new policy framework and
                        next-generation RDS are required, the PDP WG
                        will then proceed to Phases 2 and 3,
                        recommending a new consensus policy framework to
                        satisfy requirements for a next-generation RDS
                        established in Phase 1, along with any necessary
                        coexistence and implementation guidance. Further
                        detail regarding this 3-phase process and
                        questions to be considered can be found in the
                        PDP WG’s charter.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <b class="">How This Team Will Work</b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        ICANN WGs use transparent, open processes. The
                        meetings of this PDP WG will be recorded, and
                        the recordings will be available to the public.
                        The mailing list for the PDP WG will be archived
                        publicly. The group will collaborate using a
                        public workspace for draft materials and all
                        final work products and milestones will be
                        documented on the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois"
                          target="_blank" class="">WG's wiki</a>. The
                        PDP WG is expected to follow the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">GNSO Working Group
                          Guidelines</a> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the
                        GNSO PDP Manual.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <b class="">How to participate </b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        There are two ways to volunteer: </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Individual Members – anyone
                        interested cann volunteer to join the PDP WG as
                        a WG member, regardless of whether they are
                        members of the ICANN community. Members are
                        expected to actively contribute to mailing list
                        conversations as well as meetings – it is
                        anticipated tthat the PDP WG will at a minimum
                        meet on a weekly basis via teleconference.
                        Members are expected to provide essential input
                        to the process. Members will be required to
                        provide a Statement of Interest (<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs"
                          target="_blank" class="">SOI</a>). </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Mailing list observers – for
                        those who are merely interested in monitoring
                        thhe WG’s conversations, there is the
                        possibility to sign up as a mailing list
                        "observer" which offers read-only access to the
                        mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be
                        permitted to post, will not receive invitations
                        to the various meetings or calls of the WG and
                        will not have to complete a Statement of
                        Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list
                        observer can join the WG as a member simply by
                        informing the GNSO Secretariat. </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">In addition, there will be
                        opportunities to provide input through public
                        consultations and public comment processes that
                        the PDP WG is expected to organize.<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <b class="">How to Join</b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        If you are interested in joining the WG as an
                        individual participant or mailing list observer,
                        please fill in the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://goo.gl/forms/bb65iIznLv"
                          target="_blank" class="">sign up form</a> or
                        send the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gnso-pdp-next-gen-rds-wg-sign-up-04jan16-en.docx"
                          target="_blank" class="">Word document</a>
                        [DOCX, 72 KB] filled in to the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org"
                          target="_blank" class="">GNSO Secretariat</a></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">All members and observers
                        will be listed on the PDP WG's wiki page. <br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <b class="">Next steps</b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        In its motion, the GNSO Council directed that
                        this call for volunteers be circulated as widely
                        as possible in order to ensure broad
                        representation and participation in the WG. This
                        call will remain open until the WG convenes for
                        the first time. At this juncture, it is
                        anticipated that the PDP WG may convene online
                        in late January 2015. Following that, regular
                        online meetings will be scheduled in accordance
                        with the PDP WG’s work plan, which it is
                        expected to develop as one of its first tasks.<br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <b class="">Further information and preparation</b></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">For those interested in
                        volunteering for this effort, you are strongly
                        encouraged to review the following materials
                        prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">The <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">Final Issue Report</a>
                      </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">The <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">approved charter</a>
                      </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Materials available at the
                        PDP <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois"
                          target="_blank" class="">WG's wiki</a> such as
                        the EWG Final Report and other relevant
                        information. </p>
                      <h3 class="">Background</h3>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
                        Created in the 1980s, WHOIS began as a service
                        to identify and contact entities responsible for
                        the operation of a network resource on the
                        Internet. Over the years, ICANN's requirements
                        for gTLD domain name registration data
                        collection, access and accuracy have undergone
                        some important changes. Yet, after nearly 15
                        years of task forces, review teams, and studies,
                        comprehensive WHOIS policy reform remains the
                        source of long-running discussion and debate.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">In 2012, the ICANN Board
                        launched the Expert Working Group on gTLD
                        Registration Directory Services (EWG) to help
                        redefine the purpose of gTLD registration data
                        and consider how to safeguard the data, and to
                        propose a model for gTLD registration directory
                        services (RDS) to address accuracy, privacy, and
                        access issues.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Upon publication of the EWG's
                        Final Report in June, 2014, an informal group of
                        GNSO Councilors and ICANN Board Members
                        collaborated to propose a Process Framework for
                        structuring a GNSO PDP to successfully address
                        these challenging issues. This Process Framework
                        was adopted by the Board in 2015, along with a
                        reaffirmation of its 2012 request for a PDP to
                        be convened to define the purpose of collecting,
                        maintaining and providing access to gTLD
                        registration data. The Board also asked that the
                        PDP consider safeguards for protecting data,
                        using the recommendations in the EWG's Final
                        Report as an input to, and, if appropriate, as
                        the foundation for a new gTLD policy.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">In preparation for this PDP,
                        a new <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/rds-prelim-issue-13jul15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">Preliminary Issue
                          Report</a> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-prelim-issue-2015-07-13-en"
                          target="_blank" class="">public comment</a> on
                        13 July 2015. A <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf"
                          target="_blank" class="">Final Issue Report</a>
                        [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7
                        October 2015, including links to all public
                        comments received, along with a draft charter
                        for the PDP WG. This draft charter was approved
                        by the GNSO Council on <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+November+2015"
                          target="_blank" class="">19 November 2015</a>,
                        enabling the formation of a GNSO working group
                        of community volunteers to progress this PDP.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">More information can be found
                        on the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rds"
                          target="_blank" class="">GNSO PDP on
                          Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory
                          Service (RDS) page</a> and the <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois"
                          target="_blank" class="">WG's wiki</a>,
                        including the WG's charter, inputs already
                        provided by all SG/Cs during the public comment
                        period, and an extensive library of foundational
                        materials to inform the WG's deliberations. In
                        addition, the WG will reach out to all SG/Cs for
                        feedback on any items that they believe should
                        be considered that may not have been
                        specifically called out in the approved charter.</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">As this will be a complex
                        multi-phase PDP, all those interested in helping
                        to shape the policy framework for a
                        next-generation gTLD RDS are encouraged to
                        volunteer for this WG. Only with the help of the
                        entire community can this WG achieve its goal of
                        formally defining an appropriate purpose of gTLD
                        registration data and establishing a new policy
                        framework to enable permissible access to that
                        data with improved privacy and accuracy.<br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                      </p>
                      <h5 class=""> </h5>
                      <div class=""> <br
                          class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                      </div>
                      <div class=""> <br
                          class="webkit-block-placeholder">
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <br class="">
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br class="">
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>