<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Colleagues,<br>
<br>
As has been discussed here before, there has been an effort by a
number of NCSG members (and others) to enhance ICANN's transparency
mechanisms, including its DIDP (cf:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A1=ind1510&L=NCSG-DISCUSS#6">https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A1=ind1510&L=NCSG-DISCUSS#6</a>).<br>
<br>
Initially, this was slated to be addressed in work stream 2.
However, a change regarding how ICANN entities will be designated
has led to a transparency gap and specifically into an enforcement
gap under California law. This has opened a window to begin
addressing some of our transparency issues in WS-1.<br>
<br>
Brett and others have put together a statement on what should go
into this enhanced transparency initiative, and I was wondering if
a) there's any more NCSG input and b) if there's a chance to make
this an NCSG statement:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/11sX-zY5uie9s7zNeGz2GIRXk7BBg2xrbN_pplpJnNvc/edit?pli=1#heading=h.gjdgxs">https://docs.google.com/document/d/11sX-zY5uie9s7zNeGz2GIRXk7BBg2xrbN_pplpJnNvc/edit?pli=1#heading=h.gjdgxs</a><br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Tamir<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div> <br>
<font color="000000" face="Calibri">Tamir Israel<br>
Staff Lawyer<br>
<br>
Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public
Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)<br>
University of Ottawa | Faculty of Law | CML Section<br>
57 Louis Pasteur Street<br>
Ottawa | ON | K1N 6N5<br>
☎: (613) 562-5800 ext. 2914<br>
Fax: (613) 562-5417<br>
PGP: <a
href="https://cippic.ca/documents/keys/tisrael@cippic.ca-pub.txt">0xF0F41649</a><br>
<br>
</font> <strong><font color="008000" face="calibri" size="2">♺
Do you really need to print this email? / Est-ce nécessaire
d’imprimer ce courriel?</font></strong>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>