<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><small>Milton, I see your point and am
        of two minds here on your second comment. <br>
        <br>
        ICANN already imposes complex requirements on its contracted
        parties (registries) and indirectly on registrars. I would like
        ICANN, as in the issues raised by African registrars, to "take
        ownership" of the consequences of those requirements, to engage
        in real dialogue with the registrars, and hopefully come up with
        better contract language. <br>
        <br>
        As for the DotCity auction issue simply insisting that
        registries follow the same auction rules as ICANN imposes on
        itself does not seem a politicizing move to me, but there is
        another option here. That involves carrying out a proactive
        education and awareness campaign, targeted at city governments,
        so that they approach the DotCity gTLD opportunities as well
        informed as the commercial interests offering the manage their
        gTLD application and run their registry. That is something that
        ISOC and its chapters could consider doing. <br>
        <br>
        Sam L. <br>
        <br>
        On 30/09/2015 1:49 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:<br>
      </small></div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:DM2PR07MB589C10346DD2CA61788AAA5AC4D0@DM2PR07MB589.namprd07.prod.outlook.com"
      type="cite"><small>
      </small>
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin-top:0in;
        margin-right:0in;
        margin-bottom:10.0pt;
        margin-left:0in;
        line-height:115%;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";
        color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:"Consolas",serif;
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
        {mso-list-id:2144229398;
        mso-list-template-ids:443831090;}
ol
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1"><small>
        </small>
        <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in
          0in 0in 4.0pt"><small>
          </small>
          <div><small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><small>My main point was to argue that
                applicants need to get into the game (come to the table
                with commercial partners from wherever (domestic or
                foreign, developed or developing regions)) with greater
                knowledge, so that they strike a more informed and
                better deal. We should not just focus on access to
                greater financial resources where there is a risk that
                they are simply captured by clever commercial partners.<span
                  style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></small></p>
            <small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><small><span style="color:#1F497D">MM:
                  Yes, indeed. Well put.<o:p></o:p></span></small></p>
            <small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"
              style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><small>
                Had that stakeholder mobilization not happened a
                community constituency, the mental health agencies,
                would have had to spend donor funds, and probably tax
                payer dollars, to secure the domain name in competition
                with unknown parties. Here is a situation where ICANN
                could play a proactive simple role. In its  registry
                contracts it could insist, as part of its public
                interest commitment, that multiple applicants for
                dotCity domain names have the information necessary for
                them to negotiate among themselves.
                <span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></small></p>
            <small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"
              style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><small>
                <span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></small></p>
            <small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"
              style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><small>
                <span style="color:#1F497D">MM: But there again you get
                  into a highly politicized process in which ICANN
                  imposes complex requirements on its contracted party
                  (the registry). Won’t the same politics exist at the
                  local level? Why not let them sort it out?
                  <o:p></o:p></span></small></p>
            <small>
            </small>
            <p class="MsoNormal"
              style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><small>
                <br>
              </small><br>
              <span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier
                New""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a>   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852</pre>
  </body>
</html>