<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Stephanie,<br>
      <br>
      Now that staff has spoken on the selection process, my opinion is
      that we let that issue be put to rest. What we do have is the
      Westlake Report and a general feeling (from reading it) that it
      leaves a lot to be desired as a basis for any top-down ICANN board
      action. <br>
      <br>
      My personal position here is to caution the Board to treat the
      report simply as food for thought, and not act based upon it. I
      caution the rest of the ICANN constituencies treat it the same
      way. My view is that it is tactically unwise to slice and dice
      pieces of it looking for things we like, or don't like, and make
      proposals to the board. That is liable to be taken as more
      legitimation of the report that it deserves. I would urge us to
      say "<i>Okay, one more document for us to think about, as we
        explore a bottom up process of proposed revisions to the GNSO</i>".
      As well, we might want to go slow since ICANN is in the midst of
      other major disruptive (positive or negative) activities around
      the IANA transition, the accountability issue, WhoIS privacy, new
      gTLDs, etc., and those will likely take centre stage for the next
      while. <br>
      <br>
      Sam Lanfranco, Chair<br>
      NPOC Policy Committee<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 28/09/2015 6:29 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:5609BF2F.800@mail.utoronto.ca" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <br>
      <div class="moz-forward-container">For those who had questions re
        Westlake and the bidding process, it was raised at GNSO.  Here
        is the answer.<br>
        Stephanie Perrin<br>
        <br>
        -------- Forwarded Message --------
        <table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0"
          cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Subject:

              </th>
              <td>[council] Follow up items from GNSO Council Meeting on
                24 September</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Date:
              </th>
              <td>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:26:02 +0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">From:
              </th>
              <td>Larisa B. Gurnick <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org"><larisa.gurnick@icann.org></a></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">To: </th>
              <td><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                  href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org"><council@gnso.icann.org></a></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">CC: </th>
              <td>Jen Wolfe (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                  href="mailto:jwolfe@wolfedomain.com">jwolfe@wolfedomain.com</a>)
                <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:jwolfe@wolfedomain.com"><jwolfe@wolfedomain.com></a></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <br>
        <br>
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=windows-1252">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
          medium)">
        <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Calibri Light";
        panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Dear members of
              the GNSO Council,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I understand
              that there were some questions raised at your meeting on
              24 September in connection with the briefing on the GSNO
              Review, and staff would like to provide additional
              clarifying information.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D">Competitive

                Bidding Process and Selection of Independent Examiner<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In connection
              with the open competitive bidding process used to select
              the independent examiner, a total of 7 proposals were
              submitted.  All bids were reviewed and evaluated for all
              data responsive to the RFP, not just the low bid.   Price
              was one of many considerations.  Bids received ranged from
              less than $50,000 to over $1 million, with the lowest and
              highest representing significant outliers.  Westlake’s bid
              pricing was in the median range when adjusting for the
              significant outliers.  Once all bids were evaluated,
              Westlake was selected as the most qualified consultant
              relative to, but not limited to, the following high level
              selection criteria:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">1) Understanding of the assignment <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">2) Knowledge and expertise<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">a. Demonstrated experience in
              conducting broadly similar examinations <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">b. Not-for-profit experience <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">c. Basic knowledge of ICANN <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">d. Geographic and cultural diversity,
              multilingualism, gender balance <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">e. Suitability of proposed CVs <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">3) Proposed methodology<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">a. Work organization, project
              management approach, timelines <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">b. Suitability of tools and methods or
              work <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:1.0in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">c. Clarity of deliverables <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">4) Flexibility, including but not
              limited to meeting the timeline <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">5) Reference checks <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">6) Financial value <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-left:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span
              style="color:black">7) Conflict of Interest <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">=>
              Additional information about the <a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm"><span
                  style="color:#0563C1">RFP</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">=> GNSO
              Review <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="https://community.icann.org/x/zbXhAg"> <span
                  style="color:#0563C1">FAQs</span></a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Staff is
              available to provide the GNSO Council a more complete
              overview of how the competitive bidding/RFP process
              functions, including what information is required to be
              kept confidential for the benefit of the process’
              integrity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span><span
              style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D">Review
                Methodology<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">The methodology
              used for the GNSO Review followed best practices and
              professional standards for independence, proficiency and
              due professional care.  The current GNSO Review achieved
              178 completed 360 Survey responses and 40 one-on-one
              interviews, compared with an average of 71 survey
              responses and 60 interviews for prior Organizational
              Reviews.  Information was collected through a variety of
              means – online 360 Survey with quantitative and
              qualitative aspects, one-on-one interviews that resulted
              in twice as many individuals interviewed as originally
              planned, extensive desk review of documents and in-person
              observations during three ICANN meetings.  Additionally,
              Westlake participated in the majority of the 21 GNSO
              Review Working Party calls and 23 public sessions held at
              ICANN meetings and considered feedback provided by the
              GNSO Review Working Party as well as by others through
              formal  public comment process and other feedback means. 
            </span>The Independent Examiner provided their rationale in
            response to community feedback throughout the process<span
              style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black">(for
              example, see</span><span style="color:#1F497D"> <a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56136596/GNSO%20Review%20Recommendations%20-%20changes%20from%20Draft%20to%20Final%20Report.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1443222114000&api=v2"><span
                  style="color:#0563C1">Comparison Chart</span></a>)</span><span
              style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">=> Detailed
              information on Review Methodology is included in the <a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf"><span
                  style="color:#0563C1">Final Report</span></a>, Section
              3 (pages 24-30).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Thank you for
              your continued interest and support of this important
              accountability mechanism.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri
                Light",sans-serif">Larisa B. Gurnick<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Director, Strategic Initiatives<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Mobile: 1 310 383-8995<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Skype: larisa.gurnick<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a>   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852</pre>
  </body>
</html>