<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Hi,</div><br><div><div>On Mar 18, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@GMAIL.COM">seun.ojedeji@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Sam Lanfranco<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lanfran@yorku.ca" target="_blank">lanfran@yorku.ca</a>></span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><small>On 18/03/2015 7:56 AM, Timothe Litt wrote:<br></small></div><blockquote type="cite"><pre><small>Doctor, doctor give me the news:
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/</a>
Sigh.</small>
</pre></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal">What I do not understand is why ICANN could not see these problems coming from the start.</p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Before i add a strong +1 to this, i quote the intro of the article below:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto;">Domain-name overseer ICANN has decided that only one kind of doctor may be allowed online – and that is a medical doctor. In a<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b>decision</b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>made late last month.<br></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>Could someone kindly refer me to where i can find that decision statement?</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I did a quick search on recent board resolutions, and actually couldn’t find anything. In fact, according to the published activity of the ICANN board, this was discussed during a meeting on February 12th, but no resolution seems to have been taken.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2015-02-12-en">https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2015-02-12-en</a></div><div><br></div><div>I would also like to see a resolution and rationale on this.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>Amr</div></body></html>