<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
All,<br>
<br>
Here is the “trail” on the reference to the following
statement...which leads back to ICANN.<br>
<br>
“<i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">Domain-name overseer ICANN
has
decided that only one kind of doctor may be allowed online – and
that is a
medical doctor</i>”. <br>
<br>
It is in the article by Kieren McCarthy at <a
href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/</a>
<br>
Kieren cites a blog by Jon Nevett “<i
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">The
.DOCTOR Quarantine</i>” in <a
href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150312_the_doctor_quarantine/">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150312_the_doctor_quarantine/</a><o:p></o:p>
<br>
<br>
On March 12th Jon Nevett writes: <i>"In an utterly surprising move,
ICANN staff and the Board's New gTLD Program Committee ("NGPC")
recently informed the applicants for .DOCTOR that it has singled
out the gTLD as a test case for controlling content and limiting
speech on the Internet."<br>
<br>
</i>The following jpeg is from the March 12, 2015 pdf at:<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-request-15-3-brice-trail-llc-redacted-12mar15-en.pdf">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-request-15-3-brice-trail-llc-redacted-12mar15-en.pdf</a><br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part4.00080809.07080201@yorku.ca" alt="" height="635"
width="949"><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>