<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
hi,<br>
<br>
just added you as an editor.<br>
you can accept and reject edits if you like.<br>
<br>
at this point is it Amr, Joy and me (but i am just admining at this
point) as editors<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25-Feb-15 13:00, Joy Liddicoat
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:033401d050b7$ea7fddb0$bf7f9910$@liddicoatlaw.co.nz"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi all</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Just following up on the call for
NSCG policy committee member inputs – thanks Avri for
starting the online document. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>And thanks Milton for yours as well –
I agree with most and have some additional material – so
I’ve added yours (Milton) to the online document as well as
some substantive comments (on Qns 4, 6, 7 and 8) and made
some suggestions for dealing with the alternative views of
NSCG members in relation to Q 9 – you will see it in the
same document:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U72dVBIuwU3eq8K1e3DWstXNZLOCpcB4YFvKmqHCHQ0/edit?pli=1#">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U72dVBIuwU3eq8K1e3DWstXNZLOCpcB4YFvKmqHCHQ0/edit?pli=1#</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I’m happy to assist in making any
final changes and to ensure this is lodged on time as well –
or if someone else wishes to, that is ok with me </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Joy</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
lang="EN-US"> NCSG-Discuss
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>] <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Balleste, Roy<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 25 February 2015 6:56 a.m.<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: My answers to the CWG-IANA questions</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">+1 on Milton’s draft.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Roy Balleste</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Director, Summer in
Spain Program</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Law Library Director
&</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Professor of Law</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">St. Thomas University
Law Library</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">16401 NW 37th Avenue</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Miami Gardens, FL
33054</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">305-623-2341</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://royballeste.org/">http://royballeste.org/</a></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
lang="EN-US"> NCSG-Discuss [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Stephanie Perrin<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, February 23, 2015 11:32 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [NCSG-Discuss] My answers to the
CWG-IANA questions</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">+1 looks good to me too,
although I could quibble about the answer to #4....that is
not what it should mean, but you are in a much better
position to determine what it means in the context of these
discussions.<br>
Thanks for all the work you folks!<br>
Stephanie Perrin</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">On 2015-02-23 21:34,
Olévié Kouami wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hi !</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Great job Milton
!<br>
+1</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Cheers !</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">-Olevie-<br>
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">2015-02-15 20:01
GMT+00:00 Robin Gross <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">robin@ipjustice.org</a>>:</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hello Norbert, </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yes, I agree
with you and Milton.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Thanks,</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Robin</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">On Feb
10, 2015, at 7:27 PM, Norbert Klein wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hi
Milton and all on the NCSG-DISCUSS list,<br>
<br>
I agree with the text from Milton,
including the wording as it is. I am open
for clarifying re-wordings, but not with
softening the statements.<br>
<br>
<br>
Norbert Klein<br>
Cambodia<br>
<br>
</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">On
02/10/2015 03:15 PM, Milton L Mueller
wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Dear
members:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The
CWG on IANA transition is going to
collecting community feedback on the
IANA transition this week. This
exercise is very important because it
will influence the CWG’s development
of a proposal.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I
have gone through the 9 questions they
prepared and answered them, you all
may be interested in my answers. Most
of these answers will probably be
uncontroversial on this list, but
there may be some room for debate so
I would like to get your feedback on
my proposed answers</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">1.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">Do you believe that the
transition from the NTIA should happen
(Please provide the reasons for your
answer)? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yes.
Unilateral US government control of
the IANA functions contract is not
compatible with the multistakeholder
model</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">2.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">Are you comfortable with
ICANN as policy-maker also being the
IANA operator without the benefit of
external oversight? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">No.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">3.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">Should registries, as the
primary customers of the IANA
functions, have more of a say as to
which transition proposal is
acceptable? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The
NTIA has made it clear that all major
stakeholder groups, including
registries, need to accept the
transition proposal. Registries should
have an influential role in any
oversight mechanisms of the
naming-related IANA functions, but
need not have a privileged role in the
selection of proposals. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">4.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">What does functional
separation of IANA from ICANN mean to
you? (this is not referring to having
another operator than ICANN performing
the IANA functions but rather the
internal separation between ICANN and
IANA in the context where ICANN is the
IANA operator) </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Functional
separation means that IANA is a
department of ICANN under the same
management as the rest of ICANN and
without a clearly separated budget or
mission. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">5.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">Do you believe the IANA
function is adequately separated from
ICANN under the current arrangements
(internal separation)? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">No.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">6.</span><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="EN-US">In considering the key
factors (such as security and
stability, ease of separating the IANA
function from ICANN, quality of
services, accountability mechanisms
etc.) for evaluating the various
transition proposals what importance
would you give to the ability to
separate IANA from ICANN
(separability) vs. the other factors?
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Very
high importance, because separability
will have major beneficial effects on
all the other factors, such as
accountability, quality of service,
security and stability. Separability
increases the leverage of the
customers of IANA over performance,
security and stability.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">7.
Given the IANA functions could be
separated from ICANN do you believe it
would be important for the community
to obtain from ICANN on an annual
basis the costs for operating IANA
including overhead costs?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yes,
very important.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">o
Would it be important to separate out
the costs associated with address and
protocol functions? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Less
so than the IANA department as a whole</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">8.
Could there be unforeseen impacts
relative to selecting a new operator
for the IANA functions vs the ICANN
policy role (should ICANN determine
that there will be another round of
new gTLDs, how could it ensure that
the new operator would accept this)?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">No,
a new operator could be contractually
bound to accept changes from ICANN
that were the product of legitimate
policy making processes. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">9.
Are there other transition models
which the CWG should be exploring? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yes,
the new structural separation model
proposed by Brenden Kuerbis, Matt
Shears, and Avri Doria</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Milton
L Mueller</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Laura
J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Syracuse
University School of Information
Studies</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/"
target="_blank">http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Internet
Governance Project</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://internetgovernance.org/"
target="_blank">http://internetgovernance.org</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
<br>
<br>
-- </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Olévié
Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Responsable
du Projet CERGI Education</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Directeur-Adjoint
de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">SG de
ESTETIC - Association Togolaise des
professionnels des TIC (<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.estetic.tg" target="_blank">http://www.estetic.tg</a>)</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">ICANN-NPOC
Communications Committee Chair (<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.icann.org/" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/</a>
et <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.npoc.org/</a>)<br>
Membre du FOSSFA (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.fossfa.net" target="_blank">www.fossfa.net</a>)
et Membre de de Internet Society (<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">www.isoc.org</a>)
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">BP : 851 -
Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72 <br>
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter
: #oleviek Lomé – Togo</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>