<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">What is hard to understand here is how
GAC itself could go down this road knowing that it is a bad idea
fraught with endless complications. <br>
<br>
Are we to next hear that the governments of the globe want control
over the force of gravity, or over the oxygen/nitrogen mix in the
atmosphere? <br>
Of course, I wouldn't mind if they paid a bit more attention to
the carbon content of the atmosphere. They could do something
about that. <br>
<br>
Sam <br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD_dc6i_phFYX_hte8tMtvQVpEo_ukSGbMe3PzPMvpJS+xjxPg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<i><br>
</i><i>
The GAC sub-group's proposal on "geographic names" and other
comments submitted on this proposal are available here:</i><i><br>
</i><i>
</i><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee"
target="_blank">https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee</a></i><i><br>
</i><i>
</i><i><br>
</i><i>
The GAC's deadline for comments is 31 December, so please
let me know by 30 December if your civil society
organization would like to sign-on to this joint civil
society statement; it is currently open for sign-on by other
civil society organizations until 30 December. Or send in
your own comment on the proposal if you are so inclined (at
the link above) by 31 December. Holiday deadlines are
tough, I know!</i><i><br>
</i><i>
</i></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>