<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>+1@Robin, Avri, Seun and Sam.<br></div><br>@Sam.I hope the NPOC will make his voice heard on this topic.<br></div><br></div></div>HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OF US.<br>Cheers !<br><br></div>-Olevie-<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-30 14:49 GMT+00:00 Nicolas Adam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nickolas.adam@gmail.com" target="_blank">nickolas.adam@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
It'd be probably more useful to have a definition of nice things
that a domain name is (that is, nice things that a domain name ought
to be, but that we conveniently confuse with nice things that a
domain name is in our definition) than to have a definition of the
PI (although this was very constructive and I support the work on PI
framing). This would be more workable than the latter also, would
probably have more tooth and would be more difficult to oppose if
well crafted (it's hard to muster a sustained opposition to the
apple pie for example).<br>
<br>
For instance, domain names are <br>
<ul>
<li><br>
</li>
<li>an alphanumeric string with meaning<br>
</li>
<li>endlessly creative, their meaning is non-rival (you can always
come up with another string that will mean the same)</li>
<li>gateways by which Internet innovation reaches us<br>
</li>
<li>levelers of the Internet ecosystem's field and enablers of
fair competition</li>
<li>our roadmap to the open internet they are reachable and
uncensorable</li>
<li><br>
</li>
</ul>
That kind of approach would be more rights-based. I don't know if
this is an interesting idea let alone a relevant one, but ... I have
my fingers connected directly with my brain with no filter this
morning so I'm throwing this out there. The definition points above
are absolutely lacking but they convey the idea.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Nicolas</font></span><span class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 29/12/2014 5:25 PM, Timothe Litt
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
But one of these days it would be nice to change the conversation
to include how to create and protect the rights of non-corporate
domain name holders. </blockquote>
<br>
</span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI</div><div>Responsable du Projet CERGI Education<br></div><div>Directeur-Adjoint de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl</div><div>SG de ESTETIC - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (<a href="http://www.estetic.tg" target="_blank">http://www.estetic.tg</a>)<br></div><div>ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (<a href="http://www.icann.org/" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/</a> et <a href="http://www.npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.npoc.org/</a>)<br>Membre du FOSSFA (<a href="http://www.fossfa.net" target="_blank">www.fossfa.net</a>) et Membre de de Internet Society (<a href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">www.isoc.org</a>) </div><div>BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72 <br>Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo<br><br></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>