<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>+1</div><div>Well said</div><div><br></div><div>Happy new year<br><br>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<div>+506 8837 7176 (New Number)</div><div>Enviado desde mi iPhone</div></div><div><br>El dic 25, 2014, a las 9:22 PM, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">Good question, which we tend to forget; the subject applies to both sides; the organisation(staff/board) and the non-staff(community) both need some consciousness of PI. While putting PI in definitive terms on paper may not be effective in a practical sense, creating processes that encourages implementation of PI morally may be more effective.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Merry Xmas and happy new year to all.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!</p>
<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 26 Dec 2014 03:11, "Carlos Raúl G." <<a href="mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org">crg@isoc-cr.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>The whole of ICANN (i agree) or just the Board?<br><br>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<div><a href="tel:%2B506%208837%207176" value="+50688377176" target="_blank">+506 8837 7176</a> (New Number)</div><div>Enviado desde mi iPhone</div></div><div><br>El dic 25, 2014, a las 6:41 PM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG" target="_blank">avri@ACM.ORG</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
Hi,<br>
<br>
But everything that ICANN does, has a public interest (PI)
component. It is not about searching for other areas to assert PI
about. It is about finding the proper PI point for balancing the
various rights affected by what we do within our mission.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div>On 25-Dec-14 18:31, Sam Lanfranco
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Avri,<br>
<br>
Agreed! part of ICANN process should be, in a particular
situation, to assess whether or not a particular search for
public interest is appropriate for within ICANN. or whether
ICANN and others can help it find its appropriate process venue
elsewhere. Just because something Internet related is important
(has a public interest?), that does not mean it should be
addressed within ICANN. Also, that does not prevent the ICANN
community from having a voice in the dialogue elsewhere.<br>
<br>
Sam <br>
<br>
<i>On 25/12/2014 6:09 PM, Avri Doria wrote:</i><i><br>
</i></div>
<blockquote type="cite"> <i>
</i><i><br>
</i>
<div><i>On 25-Dec-14 15:55, Dan Krimm
wrote:</i><i><br>
</i> </div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre><i>Milton, you make a good point about competing rights: they do often
conflict and then we need to figure out how to balance them. </i></pre>
</blockquote>
<i><br>
</i><i> I have often thought that the search for public interest
was the search for that balance of the various rights and
[cultural] perceptions. Something dynamic and variable.</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i><i> But I d believe it is definable as a process and as a
goal.</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i><i> avri</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i> </blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca" target="_blank">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a> Skype: slanfranco
blog: <a href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: <a href="tel:%2B1%20613-476-0429" value="+16134760429" target="_blank">+1 613-476-0429</a> cell: <a href="tel:%2B1%20416-816-2852" value="+14168162852" target="_blank">+1 416-816-2852</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>