<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>The whole of ICANN (i agree) or just the Board?<br><br>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<div>+506 8837 7176 (New Number)</div><div>Enviado desde mi iPhone</div></div><div><br>El dic 25, 2014, a las 6:41 PM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG">avri@ACM.ORG</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi,<br>
<br>
But everything that ICANN does, has a public interest (PI)
component. It is not about searching for other areas to assert PI
about. It is about finding the proper PI point for balancing the
various rights affected by what we do within our mission.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25-Dec-14 18:31, Sam Lanfranco
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:549C9E55.9080306@yorku.ca" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Avri,<br>
<br>
Agreed! part of ICANN process should be, in a particular
situation, to assess whether or not a particular search for
public interest is appropriate for within ICANN. or whether
ICANN and others can help it find its appropriate process venue
elsewhere. Just because something Internet related is important
(has a public interest?), that does not mean it should be
addressed within ICANN. Also, that does not prevent the ICANN
community from having a voice in the dialogue elsewhere.<br>
<br>
Sam <br>
<br>
<i>On 25/12/2014 6:09 PM, Avri Doria wrote:</i><i><br>
</i></div>
<blockquote cite="mid:549C992A.1020909@acm.org" type="cite"> <i>
</i><i><br>
</i>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><i>On 25-Dec-14 15:55, Dan Krimm
wrote:</i><i><br>
</i> </div>
<blockquote cite="mid:p06230900d0c21fbbbad1@%5B10.0.1.2%5D" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><i>Milton, you make a good point about competing rights: they do often
conflict and then we need to figure out how to balance them. </i></pre>
</blockquote>
<i><br>
</i><i> I have often thought that the search for public interest
was the search for that balance of the various rights and
[cultural] perceptions. Something dynamic and variable.</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i><i> But I d believe it is definable as a process and as a
goal.</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i><i> avri</i><i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i> <i><br>
</i> </blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a> Skype: slanfranco
blog: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></blockquote></body></html>