<p dir="ltr"><br /></p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from <a href="http://r.bluemailapp.com">Blue Mail</a></p>
<head><head><style type="text/css"> pre.blue {white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px} div, p { -ms-word-break: break-all; word-break: break-all; word-break: break-word; -webkit-hyphens: auto; -moz-hyphens: auto; -ms-hyphens: auto;hyphens: auto;} a {color: #226EF9 ;}</style></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033" style="zoom: 100%;">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="gmail_quote" >On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:56 PM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG" target="_blank">avri@ACM.ORG</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">...<br>
<br>
I do am not saying I know where the right balance point is on this
issue, but I believe that other rights can be asserted in the
assignment of names that may press on the absolute nature of free
speech. And I believe that these rights need to be properly
balanced. In do not know the proper balance in this area though I
am pretty sure the GAC is pushing a bit too hard. But I also think
the solution may lie somewhere between the extremes.</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">+1</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Mawaki<br>
<br>
One of the issues we, ICANN &c., keep running into, is that
people are champions for a diverse set of one one right above the
others. That is why I think there is a desperate need at ICANN for
a group that is able to do the deep thinking and advising that needs
to be done on human rights issues. That is one of the reasons I have
been working with others on Roy's idea for a Human Rights Advisory
Committee (HRAC), similar to the SSAC (stability and security
advisory committee). I have attached the current writeup for the
idea. I am hoping that we can discuss this the Human rights session
to be held on Wednesday of ICANN week. I have also atttached a copy
of the flyer for that event.<br>
<br>
avri<blockquote cite="mid:417fb8aaf3e5486ebbd7a1e4530c41f9@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote></div></body></head>