<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>+1<br><br>Carlos Vera Quintana<div>0988141143</div><div>SÃgueme @cveraq</div></div><div><br>El 2/10/2014, a las 20:37, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM">rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi everyone,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks for the comments and suggestion, I tried to compile them and we got this :</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<ol class="">
<li class="">Human Rights considerations at ICANN : e.g. CoE report follow-up</li>
<li class="">Discussion on outcomes to date from the ATRT2 report : specific concerns about outcomes/non-outcomes</li>
<li class="">What does multistakeholder bottom-up process mean at ICANN : i.e. accountability and "trust"</li><li class=""><span class="">Deep Concern about the EWG Report </span>and the process by which Whois reform is translated into policy</li></ol><div>I think 4 topics is fairly enough for 1 hour session, getting each around 15 minutes ( with the appropriate moderation). </div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>