<div dir="ltr">Please, Is Adobe Connect available for today meeting ?<div style>Please do provide me with the link to this room.</div><div style>I'm so late. Apologies.</div><div style>-Olevie-</div><div style><br></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014/1/22 Avri Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
On the call now, and as a preview to the section it was mentioned that the definition are preliminary and will be looked at at again the end of the process.<br>
<br>
But i will bring up the points.<br>
<br>
Thanks for the comments.<br>
<br>
avri<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 18-Jan-14 12:33, Nicolas Adam wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
Indeed, if the characterization of "the nature, scope and effect of such<br>
guidance" will be a substantive part of the WG's debated output, then<br>
it's just better at this stage not to propose any possible<br>
boundary-setting process extensions.<br>
<br>
Nicolas<br>
<br>
On 2014-01-17 7:51 PM, Olivier Kouami wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
+1 @Amr; I am following you. I like your opinion on this matter.<br>
Thank you also for the link.<br>
Cheers !<br>
-Olevie-<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div>
2014/1/17 Amr Elsadr <<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org" target="_blank">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org" target="_blank">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a>>><div class="im"><br>
<br>
BTW…, here is a link to the WG charter for reference:<br>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/PIWG/3.+WG+Charter" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<u></u>display/PIWG/3.+WG+Charter</a><br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Amr<br>
<br>
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Amr Elsadr <<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org" target="_blank">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a><br></div><div><div class="h5">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org" target="_blank">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi Avri,<br>
><br>
> I think these definitions are all fine except for the one for<br>
“GNSO Policy Guidance”. The proposal to develop these definitions<br>
was made by the work-plan sub-team of the Policy and<br>
Implementation WG as a first step in answering the charter<br>
questions. This proposal was a very reasonable one (IMHO) as the<br>
intent of the definitions was solely for use by the WG members in<br>
order to make sure that everyone on the WG understood what the<br>
terms referred to while using them to develop recommendations. The<br>
definitions, as they stand now, are working definitions and not<br>
meant to be an output of the WG.<br>
><br>
> However, the way I see it, the definition of “GNSO Policy<br>
Guidance” is a bit preemptive in some of its assumptions. The<br>
context in which policy guidance would be produced is still<br>
something to be determined by the WG, but already given what I<br>
feel is an inappropriate framing. I would have preferred something<br>
more closely in sync with the charter question like:<br>
><br>
> A process for developing gTLD policy other than “Consensus<br>
Policy” instead of a GNSO Policy Development Process. The process<br>
by which policy is developed using “GNSO Policy Guidance” as well<br>
as the criteria determining when it would be appropriate to do so<br>
will be deliberated by the Policy and Implementation Working<br>
Group, and included as part of the Working Group’s recommendations<br>
in its final report to the GNSO Council.<br>
><br>
> This will all still be discussed by the WG of course, but I see<br>
no need to include the circumstances in which policy guidance<br>
would be resorted to at this stage. WG members might very well<br>
work based on these assumptions in the future, when they should<br>
really make these determinations themselves.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
> Amr<br>
><br>
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG" target="_blank">avri@ACM.ORG</a><br></div></div><div class="im">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG" target="_blank">avri@ACM.ORG</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> Proposed definitions in the Policy and Implementation WG.<br>
>><br>
>> Viewpoints?<br>
>><br>
>> avri<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -------- Original Message --------<br>
>> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - proposed<br>
working<br>
>> definitions<br>
>> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:41:20 -0800<br>
>> From: Marika Konings <<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org" target="_blank">marika.konings@icann.org</a><br></div><div class="im">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org" target="_blank">marika.konings@icann.<u></u>org</a>>><br>
>> To: <a href="mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-policyimpl-wg@<u></u>icann.org</a>><br>
<<a href="mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-policyimpl-wg@<u></u>icann.org</a>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Dear All,<br>
>><br>
>> On behalf of the working definitions sub-team, please find<br>
attached the<br>
>> proposed P&I working definitions for your review and consideration.<br>
>> Please feel free to share any feedback you may have with the<br>
mailing<br>
>> list in advance of next week's WG meeting.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>><br>
>> Marika<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> <Draft definitions - FINAL - 16 January 2013.doc><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Olévié (Olivier) A. A. KOUAMI<br></div>
Membre de ISoc (<a href="http://www.isog.org" target="_blank">www.isog.org</a> <<a href="http://www.isog.org" target="_blank">http://www.isog.org</a>>) & du FOSSFA<br>
(<a href="http://www.fossfa.net" target="_blank">www.fossfa.net</a> <<a href="http://www.fossfa.net" target="_blank">http://www.fossfa.net</a>>)<div class="im"><br>
DG Ets GIDA-OKTETS & CEO de INTIC4DEV (<a href="http://www.intic4dev.org" target="_blank">http://www.intic4dev.org</a>)<br>
PC Vice Chair for Francophone Africa ICANN-NCSG/NPOC<br>
(<a href="http://www.npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.npoc.org/</a>)<br>
SG de ESTETIC (<a href="http://www.estetic.tg" target="_blank">http://www.estetic.tg</a>)<br>
Po Box : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 928 512 41 / (228) 224<br>
999 25<br>
Skype : olevie1 Facebook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé –<br>
Togo<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Olévié (Olivier) A. A. KOUAMI<br>Membre de ISoc (<a href="http://www.isog.org" target="_blank">www.isog.org</a>) & du FOSSFA (<a href="http://www.fossfa.net" target="_blank">www.fossfa.net</a>) <br>
<div>DG Ets GIDA-OKTETS & CEO de INTIC4DEV (<a href="http://www.intic4dev.org" target="_blank">http://www.intic4dev.org</a>)<br>PC Vice Chair for Francophone Africa ICANN-NCSG/NPOC (<a href="http://www.npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.npoc.org/</a>)<br>
SG de ESTETIC (<a href="http://www.estetic.tg" target="_blank">http://www.estetic.tg</a>)<br></div><div>Po Box : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 928 512 41 / (228) 224 999 25<br>Skype : olevie1 Facebook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo<br>
<br></div></div>
</div>